11.29.2011

"I mean, it's only life. You do what you have to do, right?"

In a country filled with riches that boggle the mind, that children must live in a work-truck while their father struggles to find steady employment devastates the notion of the U.S. being "morally and ethically superior" to anyone, anywhere, at any time.

We listen continually to the barrage of messages, often bought and paid for by those with agendas driven primarily by greed and profit, about how to "fix" the economic situation we find ourselves in, and most of those messages seem to perpetuate the policies that have brought us to the brink of catastrophe while placing children in conditions we wouldn't allow our pets to exist in.

The super-rich and supposed "job creators" have clearly proven that when their taxes are lowered, they create jobs - in third world countries - and then claim that services needed from the gutting of employment opportunities in America should be slashed because we can't afford them.

The 99.9 meanwhile struggle to hold their heads above water while relying on a complicit media to present them with facts in order to make informed decisions about who to choose to lead them. Unfortunately, they are all so busy holding down two or three low-paying jobs in order to pay the rent and purchase groceries each month they can't fact-check the factcheckers

Meanwhile, the "Supremes" who sit at the top of our legal food chain hand over the keys to our kingdom to corporations by deciding that "government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections." If ever there was a contest to set a single example to represent "the straw that broke the camel's back," I think this decision would win that contest hands down.

Then, when - surprise - people become frustrated enough to complain about being treated unfairly, they are attacked, brutalized, harassed, and intimidated by a police force that is paid for with many of the tax dollars of the people being victimized. To make matters worse, that police force is also trained and supplied by our military (see also http://www.uhuh.com/laws/DODD3025_12.html), effectively rendering moot any policy or right Americans may thought they had in the "Posse Comitatus Act" designed to keep our own armed forces from being used against us.

I suspect that we'll see a lot more stories like the one below before life in our Country gets any better.  I'm by nature an eternal optimist and work daily to try and make a difference in the lives of people just like this family, but quite frankly  I'm becoming increasingly skeptical that we'll be able to correct our course enough to change the conditions enough to matter, at least for those who find themselves alive and struggling today.....





November 27, 2011 8:01 PM

Hard Times Generation: Families living in cars

More than 16 million children are now living in poverty and, for many of them, a proper home is elusive. Some cash-strapped families stay with relatives; others move into motels or homeless shelters. But, as Scott Pelley reports, sometimes those options run out, leaving an even more desperate choice: living in their cars. 60 Minutes returns to Florida, home to one third of America's homeless families, to find out what life is like for the epidemic's youngest survivors.

To learn more about the organization "Families In Transition" - the social services organization featured in this piece - click here. The organization works with homeless students in the Seminole County schools.

The following is a script of "Hard Times Generation" which aired on Nov. 27, 2011. Scott Pelley is correspondent, Bob Anderson and Nicole Young, producers.
Never has unemployment been so high for so long. And as a result, more than 16 million kids are living in poverty - the most since 1962. It's worst where the construction industry collapsed. And one of those places is central Florida.
We went there eight months ago to meet families who'd become homeless for the first time in their lives. So many were living day-to-day that school buses changed their routes to pick up all the kids living in cheap motels. We called the story "Hard Times Generation."
A reporter's story: Finding homeless families
Unemployment in central Florida is so acute that some families are now living in their cars. So how did Scott Pelley's team track down people without addresses?
Now, we've gone back to see how things have changed. It turns out some families are losing their grip on the motels and discovering the homeless shelters are full. Where do they go then? They keep up appearances by day and try to stay out of sight at night - holding on to one another in a hidden America - a place you wouldn't notice unless you ran into the people that we met in the moments before dawn.
Time, has carried us into uncharted territory. The great recession began December 2007. Almost 1,500 mornings ago.
If you were rushing to work this morning, in Seminole County, Florida, it's not likely you'd notice the truck or hear the children getting ready for school.
Arielle Metzger: In the clear bin, we have dirty laundry. In that one, there's tools that we might need.
Scott Pelley: All these bank bags are storage of this and that.
Arielle Metzger: Like shampoo....
Austin Metzger: And over here is food.
Arielle Metzger: Food.
Pelley: So, you're really not heating up food so much. You're eating out of cans?
Arielle Metzger: Yup.
This is the home of the Metzger family. Arielle,15. Her brother Austin, 13. Their mother died when they were very young. Their dad, Tom, is a carpenter. And, he's been looking for work ever since Florida's construction industry collapsed. When foreclosure took their house, he bought the truck on Craigslist with his last thousand dollars. Tom's a little camera shy - thought we ought to talk to the kids - and it didn't take long to see why.
Pelley: How long have you been living in this truck?
Arielle Metzger: About five months.
Pelley: What's that like?
Arielle Metzger: It's an adventure.
Austin Metzger: That's how we see it.
Pelley: When kids at school ask you where you live, what do you tell 'em?
Austin Metzger: When they see the truck they ask me if I live in it, and when I hesitate they kinda realize. And they say they won't tell anybody.
Arielle Metzger: Yeah it's not really that much an embarrassment. I mean, it's only life. You do what you need to do, right?
It's life for a lot of folks. The number of kids in poverty in America is pushing toward 25 percent. One out of four. Austin and Ariel usually get cleaned up for school at gas stations. They find its best to go to different ones every day so the managers don't get sore.

[Arielle: Goodbye daddy.
Tom: Have a good day.]
Before the bell, they blend in with more than 1,100 other homeless students in the Seminole County schools. At Casselberry School we met 15 kids who'd been living in cars. With their parent's permission, they told us you don't get much sleep - with your brothers and sisters in the backseat - but that wasn't the worst part.
Marquis Gines: We were really scared. So, so we would stay up all night sometimes and watch over my mom and keep her safe.

Pelley: How many of you, show me your hands, were worried about your safety while you were living in the car?
Tiffany Lincoln: To me it was scary 'cause I thought something was either gonna happen to my mom or my grandfather or my dad or me.
Ashley Paige: We weren't staying in a very good neighborhood like where the car was parked. And someone came up and robbed my aunt for the little bit of money that we had.
Jade Wiley: Well, I worried that someone would just break in and steal my mom's purse.
Jade Wiley is eight years old. She spent three weeks living in her car with her mom, her dad, two dogs and a cat.
Pelley: Did you think you were ever gonna get out of the car?
Jade Wiley: I thought I was going to be stuck in the car.
Pelley: How did you keep your spirits up?
Jade Wiley: By still praying to God that somebody'd let us stay in a hotel.
Pelley: And how did you get out of the car?
Jade Wiley: Well there's this nice lady named Beth. And then she gave us a lot of money so we could stay at the hotel. And now I'm staying at the hotel.
Pelley: She said that a nice lady named Beth came and gave the family money.
Beth Davalos: Well, a nice community came. I just delivered it.
Beth Davalos runs programs for homeless kids in the Seminole County schools. This is the video that she shot when she found Jade's family.
[Jade Wiley, inside car: Well, we deal with it. Every day we deal with it when we live in the car.
Beth Davalos: We're going to get you a hotel room now? How do you feel about that?
Jade Wiley: Happy.]
When Davalos hears of a student on the street she uses county money and donations to get temporary shelter in a motel.
The money she had for Jade's family lasted only a month - so the Wileys, and Jade, are painting the rest of the motel in exchange for a room. But this is rare. Of all the homeless families in Florida, two-thirds are living on the street.
Beth Davalos: I hear about it every week, every couple of days. If they're not living in their car right now, they are avoiding it. Some of them don't even have cars to live in. Or they recently got out of it.
Pelley: Why is it happening right now?

Beth Davalos: The longevity of homelessness continues to rise, so people are running out of resources. The unemployment runs out. Their savings run out. The family that lent them money does not have it anymore 'cause they're looking at economic hardship. And before you know it they find themselves living in their car because they ran out of all options.
Earlier this year, when folks heard about the homeless students in central Florida, four million dollars in donations poured in. Beth Davalos set up food banks in 41 Seminole County schools; they gathered up clothing for the kids and shelled out cash for motel rooms.
Four million is a lot of money, but think of this: of all the families without shelter in America, one third are in Florida. At Casselberry School, we sat down with the Coates family.
Victoria Coates: Instead of three meals a day we ended up doin' two meals a day. And then there was this one day where we didn't have any more money and that's how we ended up in the car.
Last year, the Coates left Washington, D.C., for a new life in Florida but the jobs dried up. When the savings went, Victoria and D'Angelo learned how to be homeless. They found out there's a checklist for living in a car. You want security, lighting, a place where you might be welcome or at least a place busy enough to hide in. Walmart lots can be good - it depends on the manager, YMCAs mostly look the other way. D'Angelo settled outside a hospital emergency room.
D'Angelo Coates: And we knew that through bein' there we could at least brush our teeth in the morning, go to the bathroom if we need to in the middle of the night. And I'm sitting on the cooler in between our vehicle and another vehicle just to make sure they're okay.
Pelley: Standing guard all night.
D'Angelo Coates: Yup.
Pelley: D'Angelo, what does a man think about, sitting on a cooler all night with his family in the car next to him?
D'Angelo Coates: At that moment, I guess I feel less than a dad. I guess, I guess I can say or as a husband. Because I'm not able to provide for my family.
Victoria Coates: Going into that car really did something to me. I felt helpless. I felt like I couldn't help my children.
Pelley: I am willing to bet that the whole time you were in the car you didn't cry once, did you?
Victoria Coates: Unh-unh.
Pelley: Not in front of these guys.
Pelley: When it came time to put the girls in school, the school must have asked you for an address.
Victoria Coates: Well you have these boxes to choose and you had one that said shelter.
Pelley: You checked the shelter box?
Victoria Coates: Yeah.
Pelley: There was no box for car?
Victoria Coates: No.
Pelley: So you lied to them?
Victoria Coates: Basically.
Pelley: You do what you have to do.
Victoria Coates: There was not an option to take my girls away.
Pelley: I wonder if some of these families are hiding from the system, hiding from you because as one woman put it to us today, she said, 'I was afraid that if they found out we were living in the car, the state would take my children away from me.'
Beth Davalos: Yeah, they're scared. They're very scared. And the reality is if the state found them in a car, they could-- their children could be taken away and put someplace safe for now. But when we find them we can put them someplace safe.
The Coates tried to go someplace safe - they called every shelter in the area - but they were all full. After ten days in the car, the only thing in the bottom of the cooler was an orange. So, Victoria started calling again.
Victoria Coates: And we called each and every one of them. And then I got to the last one, which was Orlando Rescue Mission. And I called and the lady said, 'We have a program for your entire family.'
Pelley: You must have thought you weren't hearing right.
Victoria Coates: Yeah.
Pelley: How close did you come to running outta gas on the way to the rescue mission?
Victoria Coates: We had, like maybe a quarter tank before the "E."
Pelley: So really all you had to your names at that point was a quarter of a tank and an orange?
Victoria Coates: That's right.
It wasn't long after, the family made it into the shelter that D'Angelo found a job.
He's manhandling garbage cans and proud to have the work.
D'Angelo Coates: Hard work, but hard work's good for you. I'm thankful to have a job.
With help from his employer, they hope to get Jamie, Jamia and J'la in a home of their own by Christmas.
Pelley: What do you know now that you didn't know before you lived in the car?
J'la Coates: I know to be grateful that you have your family and that my mom is really, really, really protective.
Protective because there's a ferocity that comes with being a parent on the street. Hiding the kids from cops and criminals, watching options grow shorter, the days longer and the nights...the nights are just stubborn, sitting on a cooler, waiting for the sun.
One threat to a family out here is idleness, so the folks that we met fill the days with every free and normal thing. After school, the Metzgers drive their truck to the library.

Arielle Metzger: 'Cause they've got the computers that we can use. And light and all that.
Pelley: I wonder what education means to you two?
Austin Metzger: It's everything.
Arielle Metzger: It is everything to us. I plan to be a child defense lawyer. If I focus on my studies, I have that opportunity.
The American dream is durable. And there is something about growing up in a truck that makes you believe in it all the more. As we tagged along with the Metzgers they told us they like the truck better than a motel and they wanted to show us something they've been doing in the evenings: they're acting in a community theater, a free and normal thing.
On stage they had a chance to be somebody else, but what struck us most was that they were just as happy in their roles as the Metzgers.

Arielle Metzger: Before the truck I always saw all these homeless people and I would feel so bad for them. And then as soon as we started living in the truck ourselves I've seen even more. And I just feel so bad. And even though I'm homeless myself I wanna do as much as I can to help them get up, back on their feet.
Pelley: You sound very adult to me.
Austin Metzger: She is. She likes to take over.
Pelley: And you too a little bit, Austin. You had to grow up pretty fast?
Arielle Metzger: Yeah.
Austin Metzger: Yeah.
Arielle Metzger: Every time I see like a teenager or any other kid fighting with their parents or arguing with them and like not doing what they're told it really hurts me. Because they could be in my shoes. And of course I don't want them to be in my shoes. But they need to learn to appreciate what they have and who they have in their life. Because it may be the last day they might have it.
At the end of this day - when the play was over and the kids were ready for bed - Tom Metzger judged the lighting behind the theater and decided this was as good a spot as any in Seminole County to make a home for the night.

11.20.2011

"There was no one left to object."

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention to what's happening to our civil rights and the rapid descent into a police state. This is exactly what we reap when we fight "wars" against our own people....I can't help but recall Martin Neimoller here:
They came for the Communists, and I
didn't object - For I wasn't a Communist;
They came for the Socialists, and I
didn't object - For I wasn't a Socialist;
They came for the labor leaders, and I
didn't object - For I wasn't a labor leader;
They came for the Jews, and I didn't
object - For I wasn't a Jew;
Then they came for me -
And there was no one left to object.

To everyone who has, is and/or will participate in the "Occupy" protests anywhere in the United States, I salute your bravery, and thank you for taking a stand in the face of such adversity.  This is what a true Patriot looks like.


(Photo courtesy Raw Story: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/11/19/uc-davis-to-probe-use-of-pepper-spray-on-students/)

11.12.2011

Charles Blow: "Government is not the enemy. Not always. Don’t believe that right-wing malarkey. "

Blow nails it, hits a grand slam outta the park, puts the meat on the table, drives it home, and does it with class, panache and grace.

He's my new hero....

Friend With Benefits

Government is not the enemy. Not always. Don’t believe that right-wing malarkey.
Damon Winter/The New York Times
Charles M. Blow
Multimedia

Related News

Readers’ Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
In fact, for millions of Americans down on their luck and at the end of their rope, they can quickly find that government is their last friend left. Governmental assistance can prevent the certainty of a hungry night and a homeless tomorrow. It can mean the difference between the comfort of stability and the ravages of poverty.
This function is now more important than ever, even as it is under more pressure than ever.
We learned this week that not only are there more poor people in America than had been previously reported, but that the only thing keeping millions more out of poverty are the very same social safety net programs that many Republicans despise.
For decades, experts on both sides of the poverty debate have complained that the official government measure is flawed because it doesn’t account for measures like benefits from government programs, health care costs or taxes.
So, to address those concerns, the Census Bureau this week released a Supplemental Poverty Measure, or S.P.M. The new measure changed the composition of the poor but found that it was a larger group — the official 2010 poverty rate was 15.2 percent, but the S.P.M. rate was 16 percent.
Even more important, the report highlighted the role government programs play in mitigating it. Many of these programs were expanded under the Obama administration with the much-maligned stimulus package. Now many of those expansions are scheduled to expire, and a new crop of callous Republicans threatens to not just trim the fat but to cut the meat.
For instance, the report shows that if the earned income tax credit, a refundable tax credit for low-to-moderate-income workers designed to offset Social Security taxes and encourage work, was not included in the S.P.M., the poverty rate would jump from 16 percent to 18 percent. For children, it would jump from 18.2 percent to 22.4 percent.
The stimulus bill increased the credit for people with three or more children and for married people so they would not have to face a “marriage penalty.” Those increases will expire next year. Furthermore, as The Christian Science Monitor’s Tax VOX blog points out, almost all of the Republican presidential candidates’ economic plans would “cut back or eliminate refundable tax credits.”
As for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program for food stamps, the report says that without it, the overall poverty rate would move from 16 percent to 17 percent and for children it would move from 18.2 percent to 21.2 percent.
The stimulus bill increased financing for food stamps, but those increases are being phased out. And, as the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has pointed out, the Paul Ryan Republican budget presented earlier this year proposed slashing nutrition assistance by $127 billion over 10 years.
Obama’s stimulus package may not have provided the jolt to the economy that the country wanted and needed, but it no doubt kept a jobs and poverty crisis from becoming a catastrophe. The administration’s inability to effectively convey that point is its own catastrophe.
A vast majority of people now believe that Obama’s economic policies have failed. After Republicans hammered that point for so long, most people can only see what didn’t get better, not what didn’t get worse. A Gallup poll released on Wednesday found that 67 percent of Americans disapprove of the president’s handling of the economy.
This level of dissatisfaction makes people open to his cartoonish competitors’ Grinch-ish alternatives to economic policy, which invariably means the rich would get more and pay less and the poor would pay more get less. At Wednesday’s debate, Michele Bachmann said that everyone should pay at least “the price of two Happy Meals a year” in taxes. And this is a candidate for president. Of The United States.
The Tax Policy Center has found that Herman Cain’s now-famous 9-9-9 would cause 84 percent of families to pay higher taxes. Even After Cain changed his tune and said “if you’re at or below the poverty level, your plan isn’t “9-9-9, it’s 9-0-9,” an expert with the Tax Policy Center told NPR that “we’d still expect to see close to 84 percent of families being made worse off by the Cain plan.”
In Wednesday’s debate, Mitt Romney reiterated, with a straight face, that he prefers to let the foreclosure process happen instead of hold off “the normal market process,” or in plain English: help people to stay in their homes (as the Obama administration is attempting to do).
The lack of empathy for the poor and suffering on the part of the right is nothing short of breathtaking.
And it comes as Gallup reported on Thursday that, “Americans’ access to basic needs is now at the lowest level recorded since Gallup and Healthways began tracking it in January 2008.” It explained that, “the Basic Access Index — which comprises 13 measures, including Americans’ ability to afford food, housing, and health care — declined to a record-low score of 81.2 in October. This means Americans’ access to basic needs, though still high in an absolute sense, is now worse than it was throughout the economic crisis and recession.”
And a Brookings Institution report released last Thursday said that “after declining in the 1990s, the population in extreme-poverty neighborhoods — where at least 40 percent of individuals live below the poverty line — rose by one-third from 2000 to 2005-9.”
The Obama administration is far from perfect, and government is not beyond becoming bloated and being abused, but right is right and truth is truth: government can play a very positive role in protecting the less-well-off from the interests of the more-well-off, and this administration’s view of government is much more benevolent than those of the people who are seeking to unseat it.
That’s worth remembering.
I invite you to join me on Facebook and follow me on Twitter, or e-mail me at chblow@nytimes.com.

11.08.2011

"What created mess was your government, which has demanded for years that everybody be in a home. And we’ve made it easy as possible for people to be in homes"

Okay, so let me get this straight, Joe; somehow "Government" is wrong for promoting the need for people to be "in homes?"

Am I hearing you right, Joe?  Surely you can't be such a misinformed cretin as to think that government should have no role in helping people attain the most basic and essential need of their existence on the planet.  You must have meant something else Joe, or clearly you shame the rest of the human race with your very presence in a man's body....

I rarely wish this on anyone Joe, but I hope one day you find yourself and all of your loved ones begging for shelter, eating from dumpsters and hoping, praying that tonight you'll be able to get out of a freezing rain. No one should ever experience homelessness, but you come about as close to deserving it as is humanly possible....


GOP Rep. Joe Walsh Melts Down, Screams At Constituents: ‘Dont Blame Banks!…I Am Tired Of Hearing That Crap!’


Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) erupts at a constituent who asked about the bank lobby
Freshman Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) is known for his anti-Obama rhetoric on cable television and his inability to pay his child support payments. But during a recent meeting with constituents in his Chicago-area suburban district, Walsh lost his cool when several attendees asked about why banks have so much power in government. At one point, Walsh even threatened to a eject a man who calmly asked Walsh about the revolving door of bank lobbyists infiltrating Congress and financial regulatory agencies.
Walsh at one point screamed, “don’t blame the banks … this pisses me off!” After several constituents accurately pointed out that bank lobbyists occupy key positions within Congress, the SEC, and other oversight bodies that are supposed to supervise bank practices, Walsh began sticking his finger close to his constituent’s faces, yelling, “quiet for a minute or I’ll have to ask you to leave.” The constituent, who had calmly asked his question before being cut-off midway through his sentence, obliged:
WALSH: Thats not the problem! The problem is you’ve got to be consistent. And I dont want government meddling in the marketplace. Yeah, they move from Goldman Sachs to the White House, I understand all of that. But you gotta’ be consistent. And it’s not the private marketplace that created this mess. What created mess was your government, which has demanded for years that everybody be in a home. And we’ve made it easy as possible for people to be in homes. [...] Don’t blame banks, and don’t blame the marketplace for the mess we’re in right now! I am tired of hearing that crap! This pisses me off! Too many people don’t listen. [...]
WALSH: Quiet for a minute! Quiet for a minute!
CONSTITUENT: Joe, what did I say–
WALSH: Quiet for a minute or I’m going to ask you to leave. You need to listen, or I’m going to ask you to leave.
Watch it:






The conversation moved from talking about influence of the bank lobby to larger structural problems in government. Walsh absurdly claimed that worker unions have more power and money than corporations in America. But he was quickly rebutted by his constituent, who said that in any case, unions serve worker interests while corporate lobbies push for private, selfish interests. The video of the exchange, which occurred during Walsh’s “Cup of Joe with Joe Walsh” event on Sunday in the town of Gurnee, Illinois, was posted on YouTube last night.

11.06.2011

When this lived experience compliments the work of other professionals within the recovery community, the results, rewards, and benefits are life changing—for all of us.

In the grand scheme of my life, I've often been given incredible opportunities to do something wonderful, helpful and positive for both myself and my community. Unfortunately, as an old psychiatrist once told me while I was a wee lad of 14 and living in a Transactional Analysis-based (I'm, ok, you're ok) group home in Ann Arbor, Michigan, I played a lot of "kick me" and that has held true over at least 40 of the past 51.9 years.

A couple of decades ago, you could get away with some pretty epic failures because obtaining "new starts" wasn't nearly the challenge for us as it is for folks trying it today.  Hell, in many cases all you had to do was to move across state lines and viola, your new start began!

But if you didn't learn from your past, you were bound to repeat it in your future, no matter where you put down new roots at, and such was my case, time after time.

I don't know why it is that men seem to learn that lesson a helluva lot slower than women do and maybe that is why men are the stronger sex; they sure as hell aren't the smarter. It's also why behind most good and decent and honorable men is an even better and decent and honorable and ethical and moral and righteous woman who leads the way.  Such too is my own case.

Today's existence is a far cry from the "good ol days" of yesteryear, and I can thank the Gods, the lucky stars, fate, fortune, and the Ancients for what I have obtained, both personally and professionally.  Clearly however, the biggest and most heartfelt "Thank You" goes to my Significant Other, Ms. Dorothy Jean.  There is not a single doubt in my mind that I absolutely would not be here writing this today without my better half's faith in - and support of - me while I crammed 40 years of professional development and emotional maturity into twelve. 


Warts Shouldn't Matter When Communities Embrace

Our company was recently awarded an important 5-year contract from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) to launch the Bringing Recovery Supports to Scale Technical Assistance Center Strategy. I was invited to attend the kickoff meeting as a key staff member. On the flight to Washington DC, I had time to reflect on the significance of this opportunity for myself and C4.

Fifteen years ago I was living homeless and suffering from a severe drug addiction, fueled in large part by my uncontrolled bipolar disorder, ADHD, and situational depression resulting from my life on the street. My primary focus at the time was ensuring I had enough heroin to stave off the physical illness that accompanies abrupt withdrawal from the drug. Homelessness, unemployment, and the destruction and loss of relationships with family and friends were all consequences of my need to remain “well.” I spent the majority of my time engaging with members of the drug community. I lived the heroin lifestyle. It was where I could find what I needed and it was a community that accepted me, “warts and all.”

It wasn’t until years later, when I was able to abstain from the use of drugs, treat my mental health symptoms, and change my community that I realized what it actually meant to be in “recovery” and how important it is to be part of a community that embraces you.

The idea of community support as a component of recovery isn’t new, but I suspect that the critical importance of “community” in general may be lost on those who have not functioned outside of mainstream society. This facet of recovery goes hand in hand with peer support, both of which SAMHSA has been keenly aware of over the past several years as they have worked to transform behavioral health service delivery from illness-focused to recovery-centered.

The essential need for community inclusion and strong peer involvement for those of us who have become isolated, ostracized, and/or rejected from our parent communities has evolved to become a strong focus for SAMHSA. SAMHSA has been committed to the idea of recovery as a holistic endeavor for years now and has been aggressively pursuing avenues to make this a reality for those of us who continue to battle with addiction, homelessness, and severe and persistent mental illness.

The reality that I – a formerly homeless individual, in recovery from mental illness and a co-occurring substance use condition—was a key member at the table with SAMHSA’s highest leadership is a solid testament to the desire and commitment of SAMHSA to “walk the walk” when it comes to peer involvement and inclusion. Our shared ambitions to transform behavioral health service delivery as we currently know it is not just short of miraculous: it is visionary in scope, breadth, and depth.

This opportunity wouldn’t be possible for me without the influence and support of another community: my colleagues at C4. The C4 community is important because it nurtures, mentors, guides, and encourages us to take the risks of participation in community. For those of us who’ve struggled for so long with seeing ourselves as outsiders whose contributions meant so little that we stopped trying to provide them – this is nothing short of miraculous.

We face a challenging task ahead, but I believe we will succeed beyond the wildest dreams any one of us could individually imagine. While each one of us is committed to the idea that people can, nay, they are expected to recover, as a community we are more than the sum of our parts. It is the strength and support generated through community that provides the courage and fortitude to those in recovery to trust, speak, and do again. With this support in place, all of us are able to take our rightful places as a valuable member of our society with something important to contribute.

When this lived experience compliments the work of other professionals within the recovery community, the results, rewards, and benefits are life changing—for all of us.

11.05.2011

The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that a veteran takes his or her own life every 80 minutes.

Okay, for all you direct service providers - especially those of you who work with veterans, what in your mind can we do to assist with lowering or ending the rates of suicides by veterans?

Now, for all you folks out there who don't typically deal with providing services to people who are suffering from mental illness and/or physical disabilities, who are homeless, who are impoverished, what's your idea?

I suspect the service provider's answers revolved around the improvement or introduction of new and exciting treatment protocols, improving outreach to vets, blah blah blah, all the traditional stuff we service providers think of when we are trying to "help" someone who is in trouble.

And I'll bet that more so than not, those who have never been in the role of "service provider" came up with a single answer:
Stop sending people to war.

Photo courtesy of The New Forty
It's funny, but often we providers get so wrapped up in finding solutions for the short-term and immediate problems we encounter that we fail to see the bigger picture.  Often when I'm training and I ask a large group to give me some ideas about what they could do to help end homelessness, they talk about increasing outreach & service availability, the need for more resources to help people find work, clothing, food, and transportation, and the need to expand their own capacity through new staff, but often fail to even mention "providing homes" to those who need them the most. 

And so it is with veteran assistance as well. No experience of war for our men and women means less overall trauma, which frankly underlies just about every other form of miserable experience one can have in our society. Trauma brings with it a lifetime of additional challenges and barriers to the person who experiences it and the more we as a community can do to minimize or end it, the better.  While studies show that many people who enter military service come with traumatic backgrounds already deeply entrenched and affecting their mental health, going to war brings with it its own trauma and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out; just read the story below.

Sadly however, I recognize the folly of thinking that we can somehow put an end to war. Too much money to be made on the products of war by industrious capitalists who value dollars over life, institutionalized thinking about war (see example one above), religious views that tell believers all non-believers must die, the "bring em on" mentality permeating so many cowboy armchair-warriors who have no clue what war does to everyone involved, the reasons are practically endless and new rationales for war and conflict are created every day.  A complicit media continually promotes the warmongering agenda, indigence and the inability to procure suitable employment for millions makes "serving" an attractive alternative to a lifetime of abject poverty.

Photo courtesy of Newser/Let the Coffins Be Seen
A glossing over of the horrors of war, again by a complicit media, politicians, and business with vested interests in keeping the war machine alive and churning do little to dissuade the notion that military service is not only a good way to earn a living, it's damned near your overarching duty to provide patriotic service to one's community. 

So the idea of "abstinence," which I'd wager is ironically championed by many warmongers as the preferred method of birth control, is conspicuously absent from any dialogue revolving around military service and war in general.

Before ending, it needs to be pointed out again that the effort to end wars really has no foundation in the troops that are ordered in to combat zones to actually carry out the dirty work of war. For most of those folks on the front lines, they follow orders they have no hand in creating and no say in whether the actions are even appropriate.  They are merely pawns being used as pieces on a chess board by those so far above them - and so far removed from the actually bloody conflict - that it might as well be God doing the planning.  I suspect there are even some at this level who actually believe it is God doing the planning, but in any case my point is this: the actual troops engaging the "enemy" play about as much of a role in stopping the activity as you or I do. And you or I don't have the threat of military court martial, dishonorable discharge, ridicule and ostracism from our community, and the possibility of being considered a traitor to our country that every single veteran must face when contemplating whether to speak out against the horror and stupidity of war in general.....  



By Kristina Wong
Nov 2, 2011 6:00am

New Report: Military Losing the Battle Against Suicide


gty weary soldiers ll 111101 vblog New Report: Military Losing the Battle Against SuicideBetween 2005 to 2010, a U.S. service member took his or her own life every 36 hours, according to a new report by the Center for a New American Security (CNAS).
“Although only 1 percent of Americans have served in the military, former service members represent 20 percent of suicides in the United States,” the report stated.
Military suicide has risen over the past 10 years. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that a veteran takes his or her own life every 80 minutes. However, the report’s authors say the true number is unknown.
“As more American troops return home from war, this issue will require increasingly urgent attention,” the report summary warned.
The report, entitled “Losing the Battle: The Challenge of Military Suicide” is CNAS’s first as part of the White House’s Joining Forces initiative.
The report focused on areas that contributed to the problem, and provided recommendations.
    • First, the report said military personnel transfers complicated efforts to seek mental health care, since moving could cause a disruption in health care, and patients are often reluctant to begin treatment anew.
    • Second, personnel transfers occur too soon after deployment, resulting in a lack of unit stability with “unfortunate implications for individuals struggling with reintegration,” the report stated.
    • Third, the report said that even though unit commanders were “best able” to help their troops when they knew that individuals were struggling, they had limited visibility into service members’ medical problems, since health information laws precluded medical professionals from sharing information with them.
    • Also, the report said, commanders are not always aware when subordinates are dealing with difficult problems, such as legal or criminal issues, since it is not required that commanders be notified.
    • And due to legal restrictions, commanders are not able to discuss privately owned weapons with their subordinates, even though studies indicate that preventing easy access to firearms is an effective form of suicide prevention.
    • In addition, infrequent interaction between unit leaders and guardsmen and reservists limited their ability to help subordinates struggling with mental health issues. Even postcards or text messages from unit leaders between drill weekends can help prevent suicides, the report said.
    • The report also stated that the cultural stigma attached to mental health care prevents many service members from seeking help, and that military hazing also caused a small percentage of military suicides.
    • The mental health screening process following deployments was problematic, the report said, since service members’ answers did not always reflect reality and were sometimes based on how quickly they wanted to get home.
    • The report also stated that the lack of mental health care and behavioral health care professionals was a factor linked to higher rates of suicide.
    • Excess prescription medication in the military community was a problem. 45 percent of accidental or undetermined Army deaths from 2006 to 2009 were caused by drug or alcohol toxicity, and 29 percent of Army suicides between 2005 and 2010 included drug or alcohol use, the report said.
    • The report also stated the National Guard has too many suicide prevention programs, complicating the ability to assess which suicide prevention strategies are effective.
    • Lastly, the report said there was incomplete accounting of veteran suicide, complicating the ability to quantify veteran suicide and contribute an understanding of suicides.
At an event on Wednesday afternoon launching the report, Vice Chief of Staff of the Army Gen. Peter Chiarelli said reducing suicides in the Army has been the most difficult challenge in his 40 years in the military.
He added that if there was one thing the Army could do, it would be to better understand the brain, and how brain injury affects the symptoms of suicide.
“Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), for instance, are 1.5 times more likely than healthy individuals to die from suicide,” said the report.
Chiarelli said he disagreed with the title of the report and with any implication that little has been done to combat suicide. He said that every incidence of suicide in the Army was reviewed by a board.
“I do not believe we are losing the battle,” Chiarelli said, adding that he believes the Army has made “tremendous progress” in understanding military suicide.
“The circumstances surrounding each suicide are as unique as the individuals themselves. That’s what makes this so incredibly tough,” he said.
According to the report, additional factors that heighten risk of suicide include chronic pain, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms such as depression, anxiety, sleep deprivation, substance abuse and difficulties with anger management. These factors are also widely associated with deployment experience in Afghanistan and Iraq, the report said.
Co-author of the report and director of the Joining Forces initiative at CNAS Dr. Margaret Harrell said the rising incidence of suicide among service members threatened the health of the all-volunteer force.
“Military suicide is a national security issue,” Harrell said, since future military recruitment depended on how vets of earlier wars are perceived. She also disagreed with Chiarelli, saying that she believed the battle against suicide was being lost “multiple times a day.”
Dr. Janet Kemp, National Mental Health Program Director for Suicide Prevention, took  a middle stance.
“As long as any vet or service member dies by suicide, we are in fact losing the battle,” Kemp said at the event. “But, we’ve made huge strides toward winning the war.”

11.02.2011

Allowing "The Vent" Might Just Be The Greatest Service Providers Can Offer Those With Lived Experience

I recently reached out to a gentleman I worked with heavily while a Veteran Services Coordinator at Operation Stand Down Nashville, Inc. in order to try and solicit the man's top three ideas/suggestions for how we (service providers in general) could have made his experience better as he navigated the system.

A little background: "George" suffered from several physical and mental health challenges, including a Bipolar disorder and some anger management issues. He was also a larger man who occasionally sported a large and "natural" (untrimmed and scraggly) beard that added to the overall impression of  disorganized "wildness," for lack of a better phrase. When he spoke about his situations - and there were a number of situations that were causing him severe distress - he was clearly re-traumatizing himself  in the process, and as this occurred, it ramped up his level of intensity in his speech and actions. 

His gaze would become very penetrating and intense.  His face would flush and he would tremble as he expressed himself.  He often paced, and vigorously used his arms and hands to add emphasis to his points.  In short, he appeared on the brink of losing control and lashing out physically, and because he was big, sort of wild looking with that gnarly ol beard, and his face would get bright red while his eyes burned into you with the intensity of lasers, the guy invoked a visceral fear in people, especially people who may have viewed themselves as totally unable to defend themselves if this guy ever cut loose.  I suspect too that because he was a veteran who had been trained in the art of combat and warfare, it added to the fear factor for providers as well.

So poor George would believe he was getting the opportunity to finally tell his story to someone who was supposed to help him and he would get passionate and animated in the process. Because so much had happened to him, it was hard for him to put it into a coherent and chronological order, as most long-term situations are, and he wanted to make sure that he was able to get it all out to the person because in order to understand his predicament you needed to understand the big picture.

This caused him to "race" through his conversation, which caused him to appear "agitated." As he recalled some of the more serious injustices he believed were perpetrated against him, he became retraumatized, which made him angry, which then amplified his gestures and caused him to fidget and begin turning red in the face.

At about this point, most providers would become alarmed and begin fearing for their personal safety. It may not have been an overt action, but trust me, they would be making some pretty quick assumptions and drawing conclusions based on what they were seeing physically, and as this was happening, it became harder for them to listen to what he was saying, since the mind of the provider had entered the "fight or flight" autonomic response pattern and was gearing up itself for the possibility of a coming conflict.

Now George wasn't really being listened to, he was being assessed/judged on his physical actions, and the provider was all but shut down on the "providing" part while figuring out how to get this man out of their office with as minimal threat to themselves and others as possible.

In this fashion, I suspect George had been handed off to a good many folks, and every time this happened, George had to repeat the whole process of explaining himself, which led to retaumatization and an increasing anger over the fact that those who were supposed to help him didn't seem to give two turds about actually doing so.  In George's mind, this had to be because he wasn't presenting his story clearly enough, which then caused him to try and get even more of it out in that introductory conversation, which set the whole cycle in motion again but with more intensity than the time before, and time before that, and time before that, etc. etc. etc.

George's situation with providers may be one of the more extreme versions of this phenomenon, but I can tell you that it isn't a rare one.  I often wonder if, had we given people more time to first vent and just listen to them as they shared whatever it was they wanted to share, we would have found a much more amicable and "compliant" (God I just HATE that word) person on the other side of the desk.

  Part of our problem as a person with lived experience out there is that no one listens when WE speak.  There are many reasons for this, but one thing I think providers should understand is that by the time that provider actually has a face to face with someone experiencing homelessness, mental health challenges and/or substance use conditions (and the way I've "labeled" these things is done with deliberate attention to the impact labels have on us all) that person has had so many barriers, challenges, abuses and "disses" chalked up in their past that it's almost impossible for them to lay out their story in a comprehensive and calm manner that can be easily understood. 

Hence, the provider see's a "wild-eyed, ticked off, 'non-compliant and anxious' individual who appears to ramble and be unfocused."

Additionally, As we tell our story and in the process retraumatize ourselves from the discourse, we tend to get...a bit passionate about the injustices we've suffered.  This of course adds to the impression we're leaving on the provider, who often just sees as "angry."

Well, I got news for ya: Hell YES we're angry, and rightfully so, given the sometimes unconscionably terrible treatment we've received at the hands of providers, police, businesses, community members and family members.

The key I think for providers here is to understand that the anger isn't typically JUST about them.  It's the culmination of years, sometimes decades, of anger fulminating out of us and onto their shoulders because we finally have someone to listen to us and we want to be damned sure we try to tell them everything so they can really understand.

I believe that if providers could just realize - especially during those first couple of meetings - that the trauma experienced over our lifetime is flowing out through that initial venting session and allow us to get beyond it to the point where we are able to calm down enough to be impressionable to solutions and help, they'd do us all a great service and may just find a wonderful, "committed to recovery" person sitting across from them. 

It's a shame that so many of us don't get that chance.  Trust me when I tell you that when this happens to you and then happens repeatedly to you, many simply stop trying to explain it to providers who "just don't get it."

Smiling does a body good

Democracy Now Livestream