9.30.2007

Police Crackdown Not Restricted To Nashville

I have been watching the news for reports of increased police activity when it comes to the Homeless and there's certainly no shortage of incidents across the nation. I chose this article out of Lodi, California primarily because I wanted to share the comments posted by readers. Sadly, the same kinds of responses can be found in many of the local stories printed here in Nashville about the Homeless....
Lodi police crack down on homeless
Complaints lead to more patrols at east side park

LODI - The afternoon scenes at a cherished neighborhood park on Lodi's east side have undergone a noticeable change as of late.

More common than seeing children laughing on the swing sets, more common than couples picnicking in the grass is the sight of Lodi police officers strolling through Lawrence Park. They routinely write tickets for open bottles of liquor, break up fights and make sure people store their bicycles on racks and not on the ground.

For months, concerned parents and neighbors have complained to city officials about homeless people seeking respite at the Lockeford Street park's picnic tables or under its shady trees.

So Lodi police have stepped up their presence in the park, stopping by daily, writing citations and making arrests.

They hope their effort will discourage the unlawful activity - drinking, drug abuse, public urination - commonly associated with homelessness and to make the park an inviting locale again.

"City ordinances, they're tools for us," said Officer Misty Smith. "If we show no tolerance, that will give them incentive to move along."

But police admit moving the homeless along is why many have ended up in the park to begin with: Officers in the past have stepped up enforcement at other city locales - in front of east side businesses and along the river, for instance.

Lt. Chris Piombo, who is overseeing enforcement in Lawrence Park, acknowledged the renewed police presence might have short-term impacts.

As for the future, he said there are few answers. "It's one of those solutions that seems to be eluding everyone right now," he said.

It is not a problem unique to Lodi. Communities regularly grapple with such dilemmas.

Increased police enforcement can be part of the answer, said John Reynolds, executive director at the Stockton Shelter for the Homeless.

"But it also just moves (the problem)," he said. "If someone has a drug habit, and someone tells them to move it, they find the next place."

About 10 years ago, the shelter tried a different tactic: The organization opened a separate "drop-in" center for people to stay during the day, where they can relax, look for work or be directed to aid. When the center closes in the evening, the main shelter opens for the night.

Manteca officials have dealt with similar issues in its central downtown park and on a small business strip on the north end of town.

Police there, too, have ramped up their presence in recent years, but with a different approach, said Manteca police spokesman Rex Osborn.

As officers are citing homeless people for various city violations, police also provide information about area services, such as counseling programs or local churches that provide meals and clothes, Osborn said.

"We don't just move them, we move them with some alternatives," he said. "The ones who want help, ... they've taken our advice and moved on."

Trouble with the law can sometimes motivate a person to turn their lives around, said Suzanne Mangum, executive director of the Lodi House, a shelter for homeless women and children, and one of two shelters in town.

"Often times they will be at our doors," she said. "When they're at that point, we can help them change."

At Lawrence Park on Thursday, a half-dozen or so people, most without permanent homes, had gathered by late morning at the picnic tables near Calaveras Street.

Shawn Blair, 32, who has been homeless for a few years, said he has mixed feelings about the increased police presence in the park. Sometimes, he said, "they just come out here to do their job." Other times, "they just come to harass us."

Blair said he and other people who gather each day do not want troublemakers around either. So he tries to do his part, by picking up trash or keeping rowdy friends from scaring children.

"Because we have to come out here and live," he said. "This is our apartment."

Later, police Officers Virginia Elder and Scott Bratton pulled up to the park.

The next 45 minutes were busy. A man who quickly dumped his beer into a garbage can was cited and then arrested for an outstanding misdemeanor warrant. They later found an abandoned bookbag full of liquor under a tree.

But the officers did not just swoop in and out. They knew many folks by name and chatted them up with light-hearted banter.

At moments they expressed sympathy. "Are you OK?" Elder asked a woman, who was distraught and crying after she was caught stealing $40 from another man in the park.

Elder said she thinks the officers' recent surge has been effective. There were fewer people congregating in the park Friday, at least.

"I think the word got out, because a lot of the usuals aren't here," she said.

Contact reporter Daniel Thigpen at (209) 367-7427 or dthigpen@recordnet.com.

Reader Reaction
Zelph
You are free to pay for more "social services". I can understand your sympathy, most homeless are probably Raiders fans.
1stocktonian
"Raider(imagi)Nation".
raidermon07
people need more social services not bs from the public !!!GO RAIDERS WE WON AGAIN!!!
Lodinat
The interesting statement was that people have complained about this for months and months. Now that the city wants to put senior housing close to that mess they get get all excited and say look what we're doing. This is a short term show as it has been in the past.
Raymond
Each Homeless person MAKES THEIR CHOICE to be homeless, to support their addiction desire to drink, drug or "Hook". They choose a life without rent or bills so the maximum $$$ goes toward their drug of choice! I have no sympathy for any of them at Lawrence Park, or in Lodi! You and only YOU are responsible for the choices you make and the diseases you pass on to others!
1stocktonian
is that lodi's famous "bum park"? or is hale park the one that is known as bum park? i got no sympathy for a person who can work and get their life together, but instead sits on their duff at the park all day drinking and drugging.

Stone Soup Housecleaning News

The one or two frequent visitors that put up with my daily attempts of humor and delivering the news related to Homelessness will notice a new look to the site - I had been using the Harbor template from Blogger's pre-Google days and continued with it because it had such a wide sidebar area. It was butt ugly but I was forced into using it because when certain things were posted in the sidebar, they often forced the sidebar to load after all the posts. Oddly, this only occurred in Internet Explorer and not Firefox, and since I use Firefox damned near exclusively anymore (who needs the security risks and the pathetically inadequate bells and whistles of IE when one has access to Firefox? It's like choosing between a Chevy Chevette and a S65 Benz!) I couldn't tell right away whether something was jamming up the page load. Did I mention that the darn template background was butt ugly? Not sure this is much better but I 've got more control over some things and less control than before with others. I guess the tradeoffs are worth it, since I can more easily tweak the template. Good grief, that last template was just butt ugly. That's about it for now - and by the way, I'm sure the site here will continue undergoing some modifications as I tinker with the colors and fonts and crap so please bear with me, eventually I'll find something better to do.

""This was not always an easy project to be in. I nearly quit several times..."

Those Canadians are always up to something cool, no pun intended! Heroic Moves By The Homeless By THERESA TAYLER, SUN MEDIA

From the streets of Calgary, to the soccer pitch in South Africa, three Calgary homeless men made a journey they will never forget.

When Calgary brothers and moviemakers Mike and Kevin Scullion first decided to head to Calgary's downtown Drop-In Centre to start a soccer team, they never expected to form a league of men who would eventually represent Canada at the Homeless World Cup in South Africa.

Mike Scullion, producer and screenwriter of Downtown Dawgs: Road to the Homeless World Cup, thought at most they would gather research to make a fictional movie about a group of homeless men who join a soccer team.

"We began this as research for a movie we wanted to make. We thought maybe we would end up with a 20-minute show. But we ended up with the documentary," says Mike.

The Scullions follow five homeless men who join a soccer team facilitated by Drop-In Centre counsellor Esau Tamura and Kevin, who eventually ends up as coach and becomes involved in the men's lives as they make the effort to rejoin mainstream society.

"This was not always an easy project to be in. I nearly quit several times - my brother (Kevin) kept me involved," says Mike.

As the Scullions progressed in filming, they forged relationships with the five men who would become the "Downtown Dawgs."

They watched as each homeless man battled with addictions and problems that sometimes seemed completely insurmountable.

In the end, three men were selected to join the Canadian team who went to Cape Town, South Africa, for the 2006 World Homeless Cup.

Of those three, one man, Adam Vernon, has made his way back into normal society.

Vernon took on the role as team captain in South Africa and he now works as an adult support worker at the Calgary Drop-In Centre and is resuming studies to complete a degree at the University of Calgary.

The other four team members are unaccounted for, presumably having returned to street life.

Downtown Dawgs: Road to the Homeless World Cup is showing at the Edmonton International Film Festival today at 9:15 p.m. at the Empire City Centre 9 theatre with the film's producer and director Mike Scullion in attendance.

9.29.2007

Why Must They Say The Guy Is "Likely" Homeless....

I'm really unhappy about the way that police are "labeling" this rapist. There's not much to be gained by stating that the guy "might" be homeless, other than to inflame already tense relations between some of the Homeless and everyone else in the downtown community. It seems to me that they ought to be more concerned with catching a violent rapist than with speculation about the guy's homelife, or lack thereof..... Sketch Developed of Rape Suspect

Sep 28, 2007 12:47 PM

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Detectives investigating last week's rape of a 22-year-old woman in Bicentennial Mall, drew a composite sketch of the suspect.

The victim assisted in the development of the sketch, which depicts a black man in his 40s to early 50s who is likely homeless. The suspect is approximately six-feet tall, has a thin build, short hair and a goatee. He also has a scar under his right eye.

The victim was attacked at 2:30 a.m. on Sept. 18 as she walked home from a downtown club. She was approached from behind while in the amphitheatre area of Bicentennial Mall, thrown to the ground and raped a knifepoint.

The victim resisted, but the suspect repeatedly punched and kicked her in the head and body. The victim was able to walk to a nearby building, from where police were called.

Anyone knowing or recognizing the suspect from the composite sketch is urged to contact the Emergency Communications Center at 862-8600 or Crime Stoppers at 74-CRIME. Callers to Crime Stoppers can remain anonymous and qualify for a cash reward.

Ramblins, New & BIG News, And General Commentary

Well, another weekend is upon us. I'm gonna need to start gathering blankets and jackets; I walked the dogs around 5 this morning and it was cold enough to need a flannel, so I know some folks spent a miserable night shivering last night - sigh. I've got some blurbs and shorties to report here so bear with me as we jump hither and yon bringing you "the downlow" on the happs here in Nashville. First and foremost, I'm proud to provide the following info:
My friend Kevin - and new colleague - dat's rite, colleague - over at TheHomelessGuy had been hinting in his blog at "something big" coming to Nashville soon and those of us who formed the core startup group and currently make up the steering committee were all so excited about it we could hardly stand it, but until we collectively arrived at a decision to formally announce it, we've been holding our tongues (or fingertips, as it were.) Yesterday we finally decided to let the proverbial cat outta the bag. I'm sending you to Kevin's writeup on it, since he's said everything I would have, plus a whole lot more. The only thing I would add is that I'm extremely honored and proud to be an integral part of such an awesome project with such a great group of concerned and professional citizens. It is refreshing, challenging and exciting, indeed. Oh yes - one other thing - we're hoping to have copies of "THE CONTRIBUTOR" on sale very very soon. Stay tuned for updates and additional info.
I saw my first two peeps from Chattanooga friday afternoon, so my prediction was correct. The guys I spoke with stated that "the Noog" was downright unfriendly to the Homeless and they'd heard that Nashville was the opposite. What a rude awakening they are in for.... Still no sighting of the young lady who's being pimped - they've disappeared from all known haunts and no one has seen them anywhere. Not sure whether they left for "better opportunities" or something happened to Big Daddy Pimpzilla and "young-thing" went back home to play with her dollies, but I can dream, can't I? I've some all-day "training" coming up in October, plus a trip to Nawlins for a conference, so I'll be off the street for about a week and I'm unhappy about that but we've got to keep the outreach specialist running in the realm of "special" and the only way to do that is to stay up to speed on the cutting edge criteria for caring for the Homeless. And what the hell, work's paying for it, so I'll take the camera along and mebbe get some shots of folks down there who are still struggling with the idiocy of our government's efforts at "assistance" to the Katrina survivors. Ought to make for some compelling video, eh? The Jefferson St 8 story may have some additional ramifications. I've received word that after seeing my video, there are some very unhappy officials who want to know why in the hell it is that some of our men in blue think it is appropriate to trash the shore of the Cumberland in Downtown. Now before everyone starts running around bashing Metro's finest for what occurred at the bridge, I want to be very clear here - this behavior arose from a tiny percentage of folks involved in that camp "dismantlement;" not all of Metro's police are like this. We don't want others to judge every Homeless person on the basis of the behavior of one who acts the fool after drinking a half gallon of mouthwash, do we? So we don't do the same thing because of the obnoxious behavior of one or two of the cops over at Metro. Most of those guys are conscientious, caring and doing what we pay them to do - maintain order and enforce the laws. That a couple of them let the badge go to their heads is a shame and a disgrace - for them - but we shouldn't be quick to view all the members of the force in this light. I've been hanging downtown and around the park and the library lately, as I ran into a problem getting my mileage turned in on time this month - and last month! :-( - so I've put the car away and have been riding the scooter. It makes transporting clients almost impossible but it has freed up a huge amount of time to do nothing but real and genuine outreach. It makes for a very enjoyable day, that's for sure, but I'm not so sure my clients who have depended upon me to get them to places would agree that this was a good thing. Unfortunately however, payroll/finance in any organization is one of those areas that simply must have rules in place to keep things running smoothly. While it is sometimes a pain in the ass to have to deal with those rules, if they didn't have them we scatterbrainers and procrastinators and ultra-busy folks would be swamping their offices with requests for exceptions to the rules on a daily basis. Tis a beeyaatch, but I'll make do and will get my clients what the need with or without my mileage reimbursement for July and August, come hell or high water. Let's see, anything else to mention while I've got everyone gathered around here? Oh yeah, watch for some additional video to come out over at Stone Soup Video Station of one of our major Homeless encampments in Nashville; I actually shot some of it already and although it's great, I don't want to use it as the way it was shot provides too much information on the whereabouts of the camp, not to mention that there is audio on it that I'm sure would be considered inappropriate if we were trying to keep this blog rated at about the PG level. I do not want the video to come out and then have a bunch of morons head over there to instill a little vigilante assholiness on these fine folks homes - and let's get something understood here - those are their homes. You wouldn't want nosepickers to come to your neighborhood and get all up in your business simply because your unique lifestyle has been publicized, would you? No, I didn't think so. Okay - that's about all I'm gonna bore ya with for now.

9.27.2007

Update On The Jena 6

I've been a follower and supporter of the Southern Poverty Law Center since around 1990, when I first heard about the group's efforts in monitoring hate groups around the country. They've worked tirelessly and fearlessly - often under threats of death to them, their families and their co-workers - to report and dismantle radical hate groups that spew their vitriol and filth into the minds of impressionable and ignorant people everywhere. They are champions of tolerance, inclusion and diversity and they deserve every bit of support that intelligent, free human beings can muster for them. I mention them because I receive email updates from them on a regular basis and one of them came today that made me cheer their existence again. They have been active in the Jena Six situation and provided an update to their efforts today. If you don't know what I'm talking about, the piece below will fill you in. If you're wondering why something like this is posted in a blog about Homelessness, let me tell you. The Homeless must often endure a form of racism that is just as repugnant, just as offensive and just as ignorant as racism directed towards a person of color and/or ethnic background. It's degrading and humiliating and disgusting and moronic. therefore, when I see groups that fight against this stupidity and often criminal degradation of humanity, I like to ensure that others see them as well. I may not have a lot of readers here, but if even one person learns about the Southern Poverty Law Center as a result of this piece, I've done what I've set out to do in posting this email from them here.
Southern Poverty Law Center
Dear Friend,

We've heard from many of you who are shocked by the blatantly unequal application of justice in Jena, Louisiana.

We're as outraged as you are, and wanted to let you know what actions we're taking, not only to seek justice for the Jena 6, but also to address the roots of this tragic legacy of Jim Crow.

The issue is not whether there should be some punishment for those who beat a white student in school. The issue is that black defendants in our country are consistently treated much more harshly than white defendants.

If you don't know the story yet, six black high school students face years in prison for beating up a white student during a period of racial tensions that began after white kids hung nooses from a schoolyard tree. No one was prosecuted for hanging the nooses, a clear hate crime.

We don't condone violence of any kind. But we believe the prosecutor's decision to charge these teens with attempted murder was an appalling example of racial inequality that continues to plague this country. Incredibly, when white kids earlier attacked one of the Jena 6, only one of them was arrested, and he served no jail time.

This double standard in our justice system is not confined to Jena — or even to the Deep South. Similar injustices are taking place every day across America. Black youths are being hustled out of schools and into prisons at an alarming rate, often for behavior that doesn't seem so serious when committed by white kids.

With your help, we're taking action to stop these abuses:

  • We've brought some of the best defense attorneys in Louisiana to the Jena case, and we're making progress.
  • We exposed threats by white supremacists who posted the Jena 6 families' addresses online. Louisiana's governor has now ordered state police protection for them. We're continuing to monitor these violent hate-mongers.
  • Our Teaching Tolerance program issued a special bulletin advising educators on ways to recognize and dissipate racial tensions in their schools so that future Jena-type situations can be defused before they erupt into violence.
  • And, we've recently launched a broad new initiative to help marginalized children, many of them black and poor, overcome the difficulties that can mean the difference between graduation and incarceration.

We're working hard to get justice for the Jena 6 and the thousands of other children whose lives are being ruined by a system that is anything but color blind.

We thank each of you for lending your voice to this important fight for racial justice.

Sincerely yours,

Morris Dees photo Morris Dees Morris Dees Founder
Richard Cohen photo
Richard Cohen Richard Cohen
Richard Cohen J. Richard Cohen CEO and President

An Ominous Sign Just When We Need It Least

I use a customized Google page to deliver the latest news on the poverty, homelessness, crime, drug abuse, alcoholism, culture, shelters, and law enforcement every morning. I then browse the results and report on things that fit into my scope of services to the Homeless. I'm never without material, that's for sure, and today was no exception. In fact, today was one of those days when, as an Outreach Specialist, one holds one's breath as headlines go from bad to worse. First I came across the piece posted below and was thinking about our own fundraising effort here in Nashville. While we've been moderately successful so far, it always stings a fundraiser to read that the target of your fundraising is experiencing decreases in giving elsewhere; it just doesn't bode well for future efforts. This is exactly what's happened to EHC LifeBuilders out in California and while this may be an anomaly within the fundraising sphere or a reflection of EHC's management capability, it's scary to hear for a couple of reasons here in Nashville. Let me explain. First, this summer here in Nashville we endured a mayoral campaign and at one point, our local mainstream paper ran a poll that asked residents to suggest what the most important issues facing the downtown sector were. Just 6.2 percent of folks ranked homelessness as an important issue, scoring it just above streets/sidewalk garbage collection (3.0%). Conversely, two different surveys performed by the Downtown Partnership a year or so ago indicated that 70+ percent of residents and businesses in the downtown area listed problems associated with Homelessness as something needing rapid action and "correction" (I just tried to find their pdf report on this but it may have since been removed from their website). It's quite possible that this particular survey had some inherent bias - almost every survey does - but even so there is little doubt that a significant number of downtown inhabitants are unhappy with the current situation regarding the Homeless in the area. And by the way, this is not to say that the Homeless don't have their supporters and advocates too; they do, but we are by nature a poorly funded conglomerate of advocates, bloggers and homeless activists who play the "squeaky wheel" role in much of the interaction between local government/business/resident associations and the Homeless. We're woefully underfunded for just about everything we seek to accomplish and we don't have much access to mainstream media. It makes defending the Homeless difficult and things don't get easier when a small number of them act inappropriately - in plain view of the general public, unfortunately - at every opportunity. Second, the numbers of homeless are growing:
Report; Hunger and homelessness rising, government aid declining
New Pittsburgh Courier. (City Edition). Pittsburgh, Pa.: Feb 16-Feb 20, 2005. Vol. 96, Iss. 9; pg. A4
Abstract (Summary)

"Each year, hundreds of shelters, pantries and soup kitchens are forced to turn away people in need because resources are tight," said Kelly Benkert of the National Student Campaign Against Hunger and Homelessness. "Yet the Bush Administration has refused to accept the reality that hunger and homelessness is increasing, and instead has proposed cutting even more funding from programs that help low-income people. It doesn't add up."

Communities in Crisis is based on surveys of 900 emergency food and shelter providers in 426 small towns, suburbs, large cities and rural areas in 32 states. Agencies in each state reported an increase in requests for emergency food or shelter; in Pittsburgh, 78 percent of agencies reported an increase in food requests and 78 percent saw an increase in emergency shelter requests. Across Pennsylvania, 72 percent of agencies reported an increase in food requests, and 60 percent saw an increase in emergency shelter requests. The increases in Pittsburgh are higher than those nationally.

This of course means we continually need to return to the well to handle the increasing burden; a well that has seen increasing competition from other groups with just as important - and in some cases, more important - issues as homelessness. That well has also seen a decrease in available funds for giving, too, by the way. And don't look to our glorious leaders for cash anytime soon; government funding is pathetically small for such a huge social problem, but until we decide not to play "world policeman," I suspect we'll continue to receive crumbs from Uncle Sam - if we're lucky. So basically we have what can be considered a fundraiser's worst nightmare - increasing demand for scarce resources, diminishing access to available funds and a shift in perception of the validity of the need for the funds in the first place ("those damned homeless - make them get a job and go to work!"). Couple this with a sudden hyper-vigilance by local authorities to "address" the homeless "problem" in our city and you can see why sleep doesn't come easy to we Homeless advocates in Nashville this fall......
Agency for homeless slashes its budget
Move a response to a big drop in contributions

EHC LifeBuilders, the valley's largest provider of emergency services for the homeless, said Wednesday that it is slashing its budget nearly in half - sparing its heavily used cold-weather shelters but closing or transferring several other programs while laying off 44 percent of its staff.

EHC, a non-profit that administers about half of all housing assistance for the homeless in Santa Clara County, is $6.5 million in debt, CEO Jennifer Loving said. That sum accumulated over the past five years, she said, as donations decreased.

"We had the expectation that we could fundraise our way out of the problem," she said, "but it became increasingly clear that wasn't going to happen. Our donations dropped dramatically, and our budget had anticipated that they would increase."

EHC helps about 14,000 people each year through its various emergency, transitional and permanent housing programs. Loving estimated the cutbacks would mean about 1,000 fewer people would be able to get help.

"We're trying to make sure we preserve as much as possible," Loving said. "The needs haven't decreased; the shelters are full every night. We have to take these significant steps to ensure that our core programs continue."

The three cold-weather shelters in Santa Clara County run by EHC - Emergency Housing Consortium - will not be affected, Loving said. Construction of a new building to house homeless youth, scheduled to open in December, also will proceed.

Financial troubles like those at EHC are increasingly common among valley non-profits. A San Jose social services organization called Economic and Social Opportunities closed its doors earlier this year because it couldn't operate in the black. And several arts groups have experienced wild fluctuations in donor support, resulting in layoffs, schedule cutbacks and restructurings.

Non-profit officials blame a tighter economy, as well as appeals from other charities, such as those that respond to natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina.

EHC's annual budget of about $13 million will be cut to $7 million, a reduction that includes laying off 60 people. Loving said the cuts will take place during the next several months, and that it has not yet been decided which programs will be killed. She said she is talking with other non-profits about taking over some of the programs and services EHC has been providing.

News of the deep cuts alarmed some in the social services community.

Vivian Frelix-Hart, who coordinates homeless services for the city of San Jose, said a smaller EHC will have a "huge impact" on how much help will be available to homeless people.

"I understand the shelters will be open, but if they're cutting staff, what about all the services that go with the shelters, (like) counseling, employment help, classes? That's the part that worries me," Frelix-Hart said.

EHC board Chairman Phil Gregory said the organization's deficit grew over the past few years because donations have not kept pace with increasing expenses. The group was reluctant to cut services, thinking that a more rigorous fundraising effort would help balance the books. But donations have decreased, he said.

"We realized we had to do something. There are increasingly limited resources. By paring back to our core services, we can become sustainable," Gregory said.

Loving, who has been with EHC for 10 years, was named CEO in August, taking over from founder Barry Del Buono, who started the nationally recognized organization in 1980. Under Del Buono's watch, the group grew from something tiny, with a yearly budget of $17,000, into a massive operation with scores of employees and thousands of volunteers.

Del Buono, who is still working on fundraising projects for EHC, said he supports the cutback plan, despite its severity.

"It was difficult to hear," he said after being told about the cuts, "but I really believe EHC will be stronger for it. It's a wake-up call to all of us that the topography of helping the homeless has changed. In the early days, it was all about shelters, getting people off the streets. Now, the focus is on getting people into permanent housing. Our organizations have to reflect that change."

EHC receives the bulk of its funding - about 42 percent - from the state and federal governments, according to its 2006 annual report. An additional 18.5 percent comes from private firms, organizations and individuals. Administrative costs make up 14 percent of the EHC budget.

As part of the cutbacks, the executive staff, including Loving, will take a 25 percent pay cut.

Loving expressed hope that a refocused EHC could eventually begin to grow again.

"We have gone through layoffs and reorganizations in the past, but nothing of this magnitude. It will be at least 12 to 18 months before we take on more projects," she said. "We need to prove we can operate sustainably.

9.26.2007

Jefferson Street Bridge A Hotspot Of Controversial Actions

Earlier on the day that Candi Christmas's Homeless supper was brought to a screeching halt by Metro public health agents and the city police, I had been out at the bridge investigating something else that occurred there, presumably at the hands of local government officials. There had been a small encampment of Homeless folks living under the bridge for quite some time and they had actually made a nice little camp for themselves which overlooked the Cumberland river. Approximately 8 individuals called the area home for about the past 7 months and these folks all had accumulated quite an assortment of belongings that they used to subsist, work and sleep in. Tents, sleeping bags, blankets, radios, coolers, dishes, pitchers, toiletries; the most basic of items that made their lives a little more tolerable each day. And it wasn't like they were down there trashing the place either. In fact, the picture on the right shows their cleanup effort on 9-20-07 around the bridge, the food stamp office and the surrounding land owned by the cement company. They kept a clean camp and stayed to themselves. They weren't loud, obnoxious or offensive, didn't panhandle in the area and stayed out of sight and hidden as much as possible whenever they were in the camp. On September 20th, local authorities rolled up with dump truck and some heavy equipment, gave the people still at the camp site 20 seconds to grab what they could, then proceeded to scoop up what was left and load it into the dump trucks, which then hauled off every possession these folks had in the world and "disposed" of it. There were two tent sites down on a concrete platform overlooking the river and these were inaccessable to the dozers. So, according to reports, the police went down on the platform and simply tossed everything over the side of the platform onto the shoreline of the Cumberland river. What's particularly offensive about this action is that the police themselves often cite the Homeless for littering when they enter Homeless camps, yet here they were, allegedly causing not only litter but possible water pollution (not to mention creating an unsightly eyesore) by throwing entire campsites onto the shoreline. It made for an ugly and quite possibly contaminated section of shoreline that, had any one of the general public done such an act, would surely have warranted a citation, at the very least. I work closely with Metro Social Services and the Homelessness Commission. I know that we typically have a system in place when we must "move" a camp. The standard operating procedure is to send in someone ahead of the police to warn camp inhabitants that the police are coming to dismantle the camp within 24 hours. This allows the residents to get their belongings together and relocate elsewhere before losing everything they've struggled desperately to obtain. None of this was followed in this particular incident. A 20 second warning is to gather one's belongings is not only ridiculous, it smacks of harassment and mistreatment. Many of us have worked long and hard to change attitudes within the Homeless population about the police and their need to respond to public demand about problems associated with some of their members. Heavy-handed operations like this one reek of jack-booted thuggery and destroy our credibility while creating hatred among the vast majority of the Homeless towards Metro's police officers. And I shouldn't even have to say this, but for God's sakes, this is no way to treat a human being, regardless of whether they are "trespassing" or not. Surely this could have been handled better. I only hope that actions like this, coupled with the outcry of concerned citizens over the Candi Christmas harassment, get the attention of the new Mayor. This is a terrible way to enter into a new job and I do hope he works to change the increasingly ugly behavior of city officials toward those least able to stand up against it.

Candi Christmas' Jefferson St Hot Dinner Shut Down For Code Violations

I've spoken to folks throughout the day who are aware of what transpired and essentially, what took place was that Metro's public health unit came out and had Candi stop serving hot food, as she did not have the proper permit to do so. They did allow "cold food" to be passed out, but from what I understand, it was a poor substitute for a hot meal. Word from a high level source is that Candi's in the process of taking care of the permit issue and will be back at the bridge by next week with hot food, providing things go well for her. Meanwhile, many feathers have been ruffled and numerous complaints are in the process of being prepared by those sympathetic to the issue here. Regardless, I stand by my original comment on the behavior of those who worked to shut the food service down last night: It is morally and ethically repugnant for the city to come into a well established food service delivery - WITHOUT WARNING OR ADVANCE NOTICE - and not only shut it down but force hundreds of people to leave without dinner. I've got a feeling this won't be the last you'll be hearing about this, either...

9.25.2007

"There has to be open communication and the understanding that the group feedings are not the problem. Homelessness is the problem."

I'm not sure how many people here in Nashville know that we've done essentially the same thing downtown that West Palm has now decided to do. Serving food to the Homeless in public areas has been banned and some members of the community have been quite vigilant in ensuring that the ban is enforced. I've not yet determined whether this ban is directly related to feeding the Homeless in public or whether they are using some other ordinance - unlawful assembly or improper food handling or something similar - as their rationale for the action, but nonetheless, it is occurring. In fact, an incident occurred yesterday involving two caring and compassionate women who were forced to stop providing apple pies to the Homeless. Interestingly, the most common perpetrators of this type of "interdiction" - the police and the Safety Ambassadors associated with the Downtown Partnership, often referred to by members of the Homeless community as "the yellow-shirts," were not involved. Please keep in mind here that I'm not coming down on these two groups, even though I don't agree with some of their more restrictive policies and actions, but I do recognize that they are simply responding to a demand from the community at large - and in the DTP's case, their own constituency - for action to be taken against a percieved problem. But I reiterate, the information I have been provided with indicates that it was actually "concerned citizens" who initiated the action against the women doing the feeding of the Homeless. I shouldn't even have to say this, but regardless of how you feel about the Homeless one thing is clear, when you start telling little old ladies that they cannot give slices of the wholesome, all-American dessert - apple pie - to the needy, you're stirring a pot of negative publicity into a froth of gargantuan proportions and there is bound to be repercussions. There's something brutish and unAmerican about denying a couple of old (probably) grandmothers the right to pass apple pies out on main street, USA, dont you think? Sorry, but I've got to say it - c'mon now, leave those poor old women and the destitute folks they are trying desperately to cheer up alone. They aren't hurting a damned thing and they're certainly not going to make the area a "gathering place" for the Homeless because they served pieces of pie there on one afternoon. Good grief. That wasn't right at all.... West Palm votes to ban feeding of homeless at downtown parks

WPB bans feeding of homeless amid protests Video

West Palm Beach - Bearing signs with messages like "Jesus was homeless," dozens of residents marched to City Hall on Monday, launching an hours-long parade of people who urged city commissioners not to ban homeless feeding programs from two downtown parks. "We can hide the problem and sweep it under the rug," said Melissa Smith, whose parents Olga and Marvin Smith are pastors who started Art and Compassion, a group that feeds the homeless at Centennial Square on Wednesday nights. "There will still be homeless, there will still be hunger." But despite emotional debate, commissioners passed an ordinance 3-2 barring programs to feed the homeless at the fountain outside the public library on Clematis Street and also at the Meyer Amphitheatre just behind it. "We are not hard-hearted West Palm Beach," Mayor Lois Frankel said at the start of the meeting. But the homeless disrupt downtown businesses and residents, she said. "We are looking for a solution where we could serve the people who are hungry and still conduct business." The ordinance is meant to bring peace to a struggling downtown along Clematis Street. The city has been working to revive it after a long, difficult redevelopment. Fledgling businesses, many teetering in the uncertainties of a new downtown and an economic downturn, voiced concern that they could not survive harassment of their customers after the Wednesday feedings. "We have a homeless problem. We have a hunger problem. We also have another problem," said John Ries, owner of Fire Rock Pizza just north of the square, which he said was broken into twice. "We have a city that could die if we don't get people back here." But others argued that a new law was not needed to prevent criminal activity. "There are certainly adequate state penal laws on the books," said Alan Clapsaddle, pastor of the Westgage Tabernacle, which shelters the homeless. "Let them use these laws rather than taking good behavior and making that against the law." Jordan Hunt, who runs Food Not Bombs, an organization that feeds the homeless at Centennial Square on Saturdays, said the homeless should not be segregated. "The homeless are part of the general public and just as entitled to use the park as anyone else," he said. "There has to be open communication and the understanding that the group feedings are not the problem. Homelessness is the problem." One by one, residents, business owners, homeless advocates and several of the homeless themselves stood before the City Commission. Dawn Alba, a resident of the Lofts near Centennial Square, said she is regularly harassed by panhandlers. The park bathrooms are used by substance abusers, she added. The Rev. Anthony Fazzarano said he lives in the Slade, a condominium tower on the Intracoastal downtown. He's had his car broken into and often finds used condoms. "To blame it on the homeless I think is ridiculous," he said. The city should not have a shop selling drug paraphernalia downtown and needs a homeless shelter, he added. "Shame on you, West Palm Beach," he added. Frankel said the city offered other locations to the groups, but Art and Compassion was unwilling to move from Centennial Square, saying the locations being offered were in the "ghetto" or too dangerous and the people they serve did not feel comfortable. Asked whether he'd be willing to move his operation into a church just two blocks from Centennial Square, Marvin Smith agreed, saying that was the first such offer. Hunt said his strictly secular group needed a secular venue. Dianna Cahn can be reached at dcahn@sun-sentinel.com or 561-228-5501.

"For some cities, crime is back as a significant issue."

And trust me, it isn't simply the fact that "the experts" indicate there have been "cuts in federal assistance to local law enforcement agencies over the past six years," although it seems apparent that the police are trying to compensate for the cuts through an increased effort towards the appearance of control. Many newer cops are nastier than ever today, treating damned near everyone with the surliness, brutality and arrogance once reserved for assholes and thugs. The police seem to recognize that if they let things slip further, they will never regain control, as short-staffed as they are today. No sir - at least part of the reason cities have seen "a spike in street-level violent crime" is because the gutting of social services and programs that assist the poor have made we natives restless, and very pissed off. I read somewhere in grad school that a study was done on the cycles of national prosperity levels and crime rates. That particular study discovered that low violent and theft crimes accompanied high prosperity rates, and vice versa. Now, it doesn't take a genius to figure this out; when people are able to make a living, feed themselves and their family and buy the occasional toy or diversion from the drudgeries of all work no play (think Maslow here), those people tend to stay out of trouble and have little reason to beat up, rob or kill others. However, when times are tough, jobs are nonexistent or pay so little that one cannot survive without two or three of them, people tend to get a little grumpy. When the situation turns dire for them and they can't even afford basic necessities, they begin to push their own boundaries of "acceptable" behavior. Don't believe me? Ask anyone around you right now whether or not, if they were starving, they would be willing to steal a loaf of bread and a package of lunchmeat to feed themselves and/or their family and see what their answer is. It isn't much of a step to go further, once you decide to step over the line of "acceptable societal behavior." By the way, when one's life is in the shitter, one doesn't care too much about spending it alert and oriented, if you catch my drift. Drug use is for many an acceptable diversion from the reality of poverty and for others, it's a quick way to earn some extra money. And not chump change McDonald's frycook money, either, but "professional-level" loot, to boot. Yessiree, place a person in abject poverty, cut the funding to every resource available to that person to escape poverty, make finding employment an exercise in futility, treat that person with contempt, scorn and derision whenever he/she seeks help, act indifferent and aloof when they complain about how difficult life has become and I think you've created the perfect recipe for rising violence and theft right here in the "richest nation" in the world. Funny how that seems to be exactly what's happening.... We as a society must take some of the blame however. We've allowed our priorities to become skewed. We've allowed a cadre of "leaders" to gut and dismantle a network of support systems that, while not perfect, did in fact achieve real results. We've drained the coffers, slashed the most essential services, made life a living hell for a very large number of people because of it, and now we're going to pay the price, and that price is higher violence and more theft. People are pissed. They are frustrated. They are broke. They are hopeless. And they are becoming .... DESPERATE.

Violent Crime, a Sticky Issue for White House, Shows Steeper Rise

Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, September 25, 2007; Page A07

Violent crime in the United States rose more than previously believed in 2006, continuing the most significant increase in more than a decade, according to an FBI report released yesterday.

The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program found that robberies surged by 7.2 percent and homicides rose 1.8 percent from 2005 to 2006. Violent crime overall rose 1.9 percent, substantially more than an increase of 1.3 percent estimated in a preliminary FBI report in June.

The jump was the second in two years, following a 2.3 percent rise in 2005. Taken together, the two years represent the first steady increase in violent crime since 1993, FBI records show.

The uptick presents a significant political challenge for the Bush administration, which has faced growing criticism from congressional Democrats, big-city mayors and police chiefs for presiding over cuts in federal assistance to local law enforcement agencies over the past six years.

The findings also come as the administration seeks confirmation of former federal judge Michael B. Mukasey to replace Alberto R. Gonzales, who resigned as attorney general earlier this month.

Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum in Washington, which studies crime trends, said the FBI report shows "a significant departure from the previous 10 years of fairly flat or declining crime numbers."

"What it underscores is what a number of communities have been seeing firsthand, and that is a spike in street-level violent crime," Wexler said. "For some cities, crime is back as a significant issue."

In addition to the overall number of violent-crime reports, the violent crime rate rose by about 1 percent, the FBI said. The rate measures the number of reported crimes based on population.

Not all types of violent crime showed an increase. The number of forcible rapes, which has been declining for years, dropped again by 2 percent in 2006, and the number of aggravated assaults edged down slightly.

Car theft and other property crimes dropped 1.9 percent, continuing a four-year decline. Burglary was the only property offense that increased; it was up by 1.3 percent.

The FBI report includes data broken down by locality, but it does not compare those results with previous years. In the District of Columbia, the city's police department reported in June that violent crime had jumped 9 percent in 2006.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said in a statement that while "violent crime remains a challenge for some communities," there is also "encouraging news" in the report. He said the overall crime rate -- a combination of violent and property crimes -- "was the lowest crime rate measured by the UCR in more than 30 years."

Roehrkasse said the Justice Department has introduced or strengthened several anti-crime initiatives this year and is seeking $200 million to help support violent-crime task forces for fiscal 2008.

Gonzales unveiled an anti-crime package in June that would set new minimum sentences, establish stronger penalties for firearms violations and broaden conspiracy laws to allow easier prosecution of violent gang members. The proposal has stalled in Congress.

9.23.2007

File This In The "No Shit" Drawer

" Nationally and in San Antonio, medical, criminal, judicial and social service records for homeless populations are leading to the same two conclusions: that tens of millions of dollars are being spent each year on temporarily housing, adjudicating, jailing, hospitalizing and otherwise accommodating this troubled group; and that the people they are trying to help — especially the hard cases like Johnson — often find themselves in the same circumstances or worse." Couldn't have said it better myself. I've mentioned previously here that an effort that will only add to the bottom line of costs associated with the homeless is underway by Courte Voorhees, a member of the Vanderbilt Community Research and Action Program at the Center for Community Studies. Mr. Voorhees is attempting to determine the "hidden" costs of homelessness and has been conducting interviews with area Homeless folks to figure out just what these costs might be, as well as how much they might add up to. I suspect that when we get a genuine and realistic number to play with, we're going to find that by subsidizing the cost of housing these folks ourselves will save us hundreds of thousands of tac dollars annually; money that could then be spent on programs that assist them in overcoming the obstacles in their lives that keep them from rising above their current status. Heck, I'll bet there'll even be enough left over to patch a pothole or two, or maybe buy a bridge to nowhere in some congressperson's home district....

Chronically homeless cost taxpayers millions

Web Posted: 09/22/2007 11:56 PM CDT
Laura E. Jesse Nearly a decade ago, Craig Johnson worked a construction job off and on that paid him nearly $1,200 a month.

But in the 18 years he's lived in San Antonio — making one bad alcohol-fueled decision after another — the various government agencies that have supported him could have bought the 48-year-old homeless man a house with the money he has drained from their coffers.

A really nice house.

Johnson's addiction to alcohol, like that of many of the nation's homeless, took him from making money to costing society hundreds of thousands of dollars.

His troubles accelerated in 2002 when he emerged from prison with $100, a bus ticket and no place to go. From there, he quickly became part of a group known to experts as the chronically homeless — a group that, often beset by mental illness, substance abuse or both, has become one of the biggest burdens on the public purse.

Nationally and in San Antonio, medical, criminal, judicial and social service records for homeless populations are leading to the same two conclusions: that tens of millions of dollars are being spent each year on temporarily housing, adjudicating, jailing, hospitalizing and otherwise accommodating this troubled group; and that the people they are trying to help — especially the hard cases like Johnson — often find themselves in the same circumstances or worse.

Cities that have made an about-face in how they help the homeless have found that not only can a holistic approach produce better results than the fragmented, piecemeal tactics of the past, it can save taxpayer money.

San Diego, New York and Miami all have seen a decrease not only in the number of people living on the street but in the amount of money spent on things like emergency medical services and public hospitals because of programs that offer one-stop shopping for services and provide some kind of help with long-term housing.

By helping the chronically homeless confront multiple demons all at once through the Haven for Hope homeless services campus, San Antonio leaders want to put this city among those that can claim a decrease in the number of Craig Johnsons out there.

The campus planned for just west of downtown will boast an array of services: emergency and transitional shelter; dining services; job training and other employment opportunities; education for children and adults; medical and dental care; even housing for clients' pets.

Based on a loose accounting of costs through emergency medical services, emergency room encounters at University Health System and the Bexar County Jail, Haven for Hope officials estimate the center could save taxpayers a significant portion of the $40,676,475 they say is spent each year to help them in piecemeal fashion.

Stuck in jail, court

Since arriving in San Antonio in 1989 to work drywall jobs with a friend, Craig Johnson, a native Californian, has bounced in and out of the court system, detoxification facilities, emergency rooms, shelters and a handful of more stable places to live. In that time, he has spent 1.8 years, cumulatively, in Bexar County Jail, one year and seven months in state prison facilities and at least three weeks in University Hospital.

And that's only what he can accurately recall.

His experiences demonstrate how the jails and courts have become turnstiles for many people living on the street.

For example, in fall 1999, after serving 21 days for criminal trespass, Johnson was released from Bexar County Jail on Nov. 6. By the end of that month, he had received 19 municipal tickets, almost all of them alcohol-related. He was back in jail Dec. 17 on more warrants, most stemming from his municipal violations.

Since coming into contact with municipal Judge Kimberly Kreider, who started the city's community court more than a year ago, Johnson will admit he has a little more hope about his sobriety and his future — and his Municipal Court record shows it.

Kreider has tried to change the way justice is administered to the down and out. A homeless person picked up for public intoxication no longer is held the requisite eight hours, released and possibly picked up again within hours. Kreider instead tries to develop a plan to help him or her get sober and functioning again.

That's not how it used to work, Johnson said. And he should know.

Municipal Court records for Johnson dating to 1999 show he had somewhere between 460 and 485 municipal violations, most of them alcohol-related.

A lot of his violations brought him misdemeanor tickets, which then led to warrants and eventually his arrest. Two of Johnson's crimes were violent — an assault and a robbery with bodily injury in two separate incidents more than 10 years ago.

City, county and state records also show Johnson:

Was arrested and booked into Bexar jail 78 times resulting in 657 days behind bars, usually for criminal trespass or obstructing a passageway. He said he often was drunk and passed out on private property. His total cost at the jail, minus any medical treatment he may have received, was $48,450.

Was held in the city's detention facility on Frio Street at least 185 times for public intoxication since late 1999, the earliest year computer records were kept for the city. Based on the $100 the city charges other municipalities to hold an individual, this cost the city at least $18,500.

Spent 558 days in state prison for burglary, costing the state nearly $90,000.

The total cost of incarcerating all nonviolent homeless offenders can't be calculated because Bexar County Jail does not track the homeless as a separate population. But Gilbert Gonzales, director of the Center for Health Care Services jail diversion program, estimated that if the jail population is about 4,000, between 450 and 550 of the inmates are homeless. At a base cost of $50 per day, that population has an annual cost of $8.2 million, based on 450 inmates per night.

Because this population is the least likely to have friends or family at the ready with bail, the homeless typically spend more time in jail on minor offenses. On one occasion in 1999, Johnson was arrested and booked for an outstanding warrant and obstructing a passageway. He cleared the warrant with one day in jail but served 28 days for the latter charge.

'A bad reaction'

The downtown hospitals naturally find themselves on the receiving end of the revolving door of homeless people. The poor and especially the homeless have to use emergency rooms to treat problems that otherwise might have been thwarted or quickly treated by a primary care physician.

The hospitals treat various ailments, from the less serious hunger to the more acute problems that arise when people live on the street. Those include pneumonia, infected bug bites, communicable diseases or complications from chronic but manageable ailments like diabetes.

"I know there is a fellow they see frequently that basically just needs something to eat," Karen May, a spokeswoman for Baptist Health System, said about the downtown facility. "He knows if he complains about something and can get in, they will give him a voucher so he can go to the cafeteria to get some food. At least periodically, that happens."

Johnson only recalls a couple of instances where he required hospitalization. There was one time, he said, when he was drinking with a buddy who gave him some pills and Johnson "had a bad reaction."

"I fell down and scratched my face," he said. "The cops came and called EMS. So EMS came and I went to the hospital for about three days because I was shaking."

On another occasion, in 2006, Johnson said he was chasing a VIA bus while intoxicated and he slipped off the curb as the bus went by and it rolled over his foot. He fractured three toes and was bedridden for a little more than a month. Part of the time he spent in the hospital and the rest at SAMMinistries Shelter.

Johnson doesn't recall being treated at Downtown Baptist, but many people like him are. The Baptist Health System recorded $610,680 in care provided to homeless patients from July 2006 to June.

"I think that's kind of a minimum, because these are the patients who came in from the beginning and said, 'I don't have a way to pay for this, can I get charity care?'" said May. "We have millions of dollars in uncompensated care and some of those cases, of course, could be homeless."

Christus Santa Rosa and University Health systems have not put a dollar figure on caring for the homeless. Methodist Hospital System didn't respond to requests for information.

The Fire Department's Emergency Medical Services logged 916 transports of homeless people last fiscal year at a cost of $436,195.

'Not Pollyannas'

Johnson is a kind of worst-case scenario, though. And while he rang in 2007 sitting in a residential alcohol treatment program at the Patrician Movement, he hasn't stopped drinking entirely.

At the same time, his municipal offenses have become fewer and further between.

For people like him, it's the state-funded detox facility, planned for the same area as the Haven for Hope, where local officials hope they can lengthen the time between sobriety and arrest and eventually end the cycle of tickets and arrests.

Haven for Hope Executive Director Robert Marbut Jr. describes the homeless population as a bell curve.

On one end of the curve are those experiencing a single incidence of homelessness, caused by an illness, job loss, domestic violence or some other unexpected calamity. Those people are the easiest to help because they need just a single boost, Marbut said.

It's the 45 percent in the middle, though, that other shelters have done their best work with. Those are the people who have experienced more than one episode of homelessness but are not yet considered chronically homeless.

Then there are those like Johnson, the chronically homeless, who will take the most work to get off the streets — and that's if they ever can.

"It doesn't work in all cases," Marbut said. "We're not Pollyannas. Even if they recycle, instead of it being on a daily basis, they're now maybe on a nine-month process."

Nationally, there are between 150,000 and 200,000 people considered chronically homeless, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness. In San Antonio, where local officials conducted a "point in time" count of the homeless population in January, they estimate that roughly 10 percent of the 2,247 people counted fell into that category. The number may be low, however, because not everyone counted was interviewed.

Through the detox facility at Haven for Hope, chronic drunks will have the option of an intensive rehab program or jail. After the rehab program, the person can go into more programs and treatment at the same place.

The goal is less ambitious with this group, Marbut said, because the job is so much harder.

"If you can get someone who is getting arrested 100 times a year to where they are arrested only five times a year, that cuts cost significantly."

Looks Like It's Time To Prepare For A New Influx Of Homeless Coming From Chattanooga

Chattanooga homeless encampment to be razed by railroad

CHATTANOOGA — A railroad company plans to bulldoze a homeless encampment on its property in downtown Chattanooga.

Norfolk Southern will raze the “tent city” in about two weeks because it is worried about public safety and liability, spokesman Robin Chapman said.

Chapman said some of the homeless have bothered railroad workers and the railroad police are unable to deal with the problem.

“They weren’t having any effect, so it was determined that we need to just clear the area,” Chapman said.

Norfolk Southern representatives will visit tent city next week to notify people living there that the site will be cleared.

“The intent was to give them sufficient time to gather their belongings and move out,” he said.

Ron Fender, a monk who ministers to the homeless, said the tent city has been around for about three years and about 30 people live there at any one time.

Bo Cook, 53, said he has camped on the property since mid-February. The Oklahoma native said he may head out West after the encampment is cleared.

“You got to do something,” he said.

Jed Robbins, 41, said he moved to the tent city only about two weeks ago.

“This is a place that people who had drastic things happen in their lives can come and stay,” he said.

More details as they develop online and in Monday’s News Sentinel.

9.21.2007

"They'll come and steal it from you. They'll steal anything from you..."

Another intriguing idea comes this morning out of Calgary with the possible introduction of what many would probably consider to be "extreme" security measures at the Calgary homeless shelter. Security is probably the biggest issue of concern for Nashville's Homeless when it comes to our local shelter, and although the Nashville Rescue Mission does one hell of a job in assisting people, most of the Homeless I know and work with won't go near it because of the danger and potential for theft that accompanies a visit to either the men's or women's shelters. I'm uncertain as to how an effort like this would be received here, but I can certainly think of pros and cons associated with it. For example, if a shelter resident needed to provide their own ID in order to obtain services and get into the security system at the shelter, that would eliminate a great many folks right away from having access to the facility, since many are missing any form of legal ID. Even if one didn't need legal ID to use the facility and instead were allowed to provide just fingerprints and a name, those who are worried about possible criminal prosecution for some previous crime they may have committed won't come around, since that fingerprint database could be easily subpoenaed and ran against a law enforcement database. Now I'm not defending anyone who has engaged in criminal activity, but I doubt that anyone who is worried about being picked up on an outstanding criminal warrant for something like "trespassing" or "loitering" or "unlawful assembly" (all crimes that are routinely prosecuted by often over-zealous police officers around the downtown area) would go anywhere near the facility if they had to provide fingerprints for admission to the shelter. That shelter life can be dangerous is an understatement, but forcing the patrons to provide such an invasive form of ID in order to gain access may just hurt a good number of those it is intended to help.

Shelter eyes fingerprint scans, ID cards for homeless

Sarah Chapman, CanWest News Service

Published: Thursday, September 20, 2007

CALGARY -- A Calgary homeless shelter is considering a high-tech security system that would require fingerprint scans and photo ID cards from people looking for a warm, safe place to spend the night.

A spokeswoman for the city's Drop-In Centre said Thursday the shelter is pricing new security measures that could include biometric technology, such as fingerprints.

The effort to ramp up security comes after a survey at the shelter showed more than half of 284 users were concerned about their safety while there."There would be a desk where people [would] have to swipe their cards," said Louise Gallagher, manager of resource development and public relations.

"The cost of implementing it is probably much less than not implementing it."

News of stricter security procedures came as a relief to some homeless patrons of the Drop-In Centre.

"When you're sleeping upstairs and you have a blanket and it's cold, that blanket means a lot," said Oscar Laboucan, who has been staying at the Drop-In Centre for about five months.

"They'll come and steal it from you. They'll steal anything from you," he said of others who stay at the shelter.

The centre wants to maintain a database of client identities. The cards could help identify individuals who previously have been barred from the centre.

"Our clients are much more likely to experience an act of violence than everyday Calgarians," said Gallagher.

Gallagher did not know what the costs could be for implementing the new system, but said an outside consulting firm is preparing a report that is expected to be completed soon.

The centre is also considering adding more security guards, Gallagher said.

She said she did not know if other shelters have used ID cards or similar security measures.

A biometrics consultant based in New York City said he hasn't heard of any similar agencies currently using the technology.

"The reason why some have shied away from it in the past is the perception by those who are tenants -- particularly some are averse to the perceived privacy invasiveness of some of the technology, whether it's true or not," said Victor Lee, a senior consultant with International Biometric Group.

Lee said equipment costs are minimal and fingerprint scanners can be purchased for as little as a few hundred dollars.

He estimated the cost of a fingerprint ID system for 1,000 clients could run between a couple of thousand dollars to tens of thousands of dollars.

"It's really a way for them to eliminate some of the stigma that has to go with being homeless..."

My clients run into this problem here in Nashville all the time. There are only three places that I know of that allow Homeless individuals a phone number and address they are able to use to receive mail, and as soon as a prospective employer sees those numbers or addresses, it most certainly does "open up a whole can of worms" for them. Actually what it really does is provide a quick trip to the old roundfile for their employment application. We've toyed with the idea of providing cheap tracphones to those clients who are actively seeking employment - as opposed to those who simply state they are in order to snag a couple of bus passes - but the cost can rather quickly become prohibitive. Plus, once their time cards run out, the phones are useless until additional money is expended on new cards. The idea of providing my clients with a voicemail is intriguing, to say the least. A main access number that takes one immediately into a menu for extensions could be easily configured and a three-digit extension would be relatively simple for all but the most inebriated clients to remember. The client could check his/her messages from any phone so they wouldn't need to come to the office, and the number itself would be an innocuous one to prospective employers.

Voice mail to be used to assist homeless

For about 500 homeless people each year, Arundel House of Hope in Glen Burnie has provided temporary housing, case management and, until now, one shared phone number.

Without telephone numbers to include on job applications, gaining employment can prove difficult. And without a job, finding a permanent home seems impossible.

"If they get a call from an employer, the phone is answered, 'Arundel House of Hope,'" said director of development Mary Alexander. "That opens up a whole bag of worms."

A recent charitable contribution of 40 voice mailboxes from Mavenspire Inc., a Hanover technology company, should help ease the strain.

Melissa Cavanaugh, head of marketing with Mavenspire, said that starting today, each House of Hope client will be given a telephone number with an extension.

Callers will dial the number and hear a ring, then will be prompted to leave a voice-mail message. The clients can check their voice mailboxes from any number using a password.

"It's not just a voice-mail system; it's real phone numbers that employers can call to contact potential employees," Cavanaugh said. "It's something that we can do very inexpensively but still provide a very valuable service, and we're hoping to expand it to as many as 4,000 users."

Donte Wesley, 31, a homeless man from Baltimore who is residing at the Fouse Center, a transitional housing center for homeless men in Anne Arundel, said he will be looking for a job in the next month and that the private phone number will be a big help.

"Like right now, we have our house phone. If nobody's there, it might not be answered," said Wesley, who is working at a Halloween costume store that will close after the holiday. "And some people can forget to give your messages. The voice box will definitely have our voice. So it will definitely be a big help."

The homeless clients can use the phones at the Arundel House or the Fouse Center, but they say it can be a deterrent to prospective employers.

"A lot of times unfortunately, there's a huge stigma attached to homeless, and individuals don't want to give people a chance," Alexander said. "It's really a way for them to eliminate some of the stigma that has to go with being homeless and give them a fair shot at getting some permanent employment."

In addition to using the voice mail to communicate with prospective employers, said James Harris, 32, a homeless man from Prince George's County who also resides at the Fouse Center, he will be able to talk to his family.

Harris has been homeless for about six months, because, he said, "I had a lot of deaths in my family."

"Not only for work, but if a family member calls for an emergency," Harris said. "We're mostly out in the daytime going to meetings and looking for jobs, so the little bit of family I do have, I'll be able to keep in touch with them."

Smiling does a body good

Democracy Now Livestream