8.31.2012

Military Spending: $600+ Billion / Homeless Assistance spending: $1.79 Billion

I don't think there is anything in the public sphere that outrages me more than the obscene and morally reprehensible difference between what we spend on the military and what we spend on affordable housing in this country.

My good friends over at the National Coalition for the Homeless drive home this point succinctly with a great fact sheet:

Military Spending vs. Affordable Housing and Veteran’s Affairs Spending

Published by the National Coalition for the Homeless, July 2009

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex.”
-Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address, Jan. 17, 1961
The President’s Budget request for FY10 suggests giving the Department of Defense a budget of $533.7 billion.  The Budget includes funding to increase the size of both the Army and the Marine Corps by sustaining permanent forces. Additionally, there is a request for $130.0 billion in supplemental appropriations in order to draw troops away from Iraq and into Afghanistan (Department of Defense).
The amount that the government spends on the war compared to what it spends on affordable housing and taking care of its war veterans alarmingly show where the values of our nation lie. As we have seen from our history with the Vietnam War and the War on Poverty, armed conflict distracts our nation from the dire domestic problems.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has a remarkably smaller budget compared to the Defense budget at request at $46.3 billion for FY 2010. Only $1.79 billion from the entire budget is devoted to “homeless assistance grants”. This amount might be able to alleviate homelessness in one state.
For the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, the President has a budget of $112.8 billion for FY 2010, increasing 15% from 2009.  The Department of Veterans Affairs also boasts that its homeless assistance programs constitute the largest integrated network of services in the United States.  Veterans’ Affairs budget allocates $3.222 billion to combating homelessness (Department of Veterans Affairs). The National Coalition for Homeless Veterans says that of the 400,000 homeless veterans on the street any given night, the Department of Veterans Affairs reaches only about 25% of them.
Obviously, the federal government has the resources to provide significant aid to homeless people but still lacks the will to end homelessness in America.


RESOURCES:
Veterans’ Affairs. “VA 2010 Budget Fast Facts,” 2009. 1722 I Street N.W. Washington D.C., 20421.
National Coalition for Homeless Veterans. “Background & Statistics,” 2005. 333 ½ Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20003-1148.

That we spend something like 5 times what the next nearest country spends on their military - some $600 billion plus annually - while even one person in our country goes homeless, hungry and mired in ever-increasing poverty- should not only give pause to everyone who cares about their community, it should also rise to the level of a national discussion. Yet we rarely hear from those we "choose" to represent us in our government about this lopsided and frankly conscience-shocking comparison.

And when the issue is raised, rational voices expressing shock and dismay about this ratio are immediately drowned out by hawks and warmongers who claim those voices make America "weak" or that reducing the Defense budget will mean job losses.  Military spending props up a lot of cities and pours billions into local coffers, so it doesn't take a lot of brainpower to realize that politicians have a vested interest in not just maintaining the status quo. but increasing military spending whenever and wherever it is possible.

My answer is simple, really, but of course will be screamed down by those who think gunbarrel dipomacy is effective and that "everyone wants to live like an American": cut the military budget in half and use that money in one of two ways - either pay down the National Debt, or use the money to raise the minimum wage, provide subsidies to small businesses that hire people with "living"-wage rates based on the cities they're in rather than a "minimum" wage, and invest in improvements in education and workforce development across the board for the American people.   

We won't end homelessness simply by providing additional housing.  We've got to assist people in learning how to be successful contributors within our communities.  We do that by paying a person a livable wage, ensuring they have the education and skills to function in a technologically sophisticated environment, and we need to ensure they have at their disposal all the tools they will need to become successful in that process.

Until we begin addressing the systemic issues facing our country, reassess our priorities, and make some fundamental shifts about the way we support our own people, I'm afraid all of our efforts at ending homelessness, reducing poverty, and providing people with a real opportunity to live an "American Dream" will simply be like arranging deck chairs on the Titanic for the best views of the iceberg.

8.30.2012

"new face of homelessness in a deepening foreclosure and economic crisis: the American family"...And the Elderly

My friend and colleague Diane Nilan and I recently shared a brief discussion on the issue of family homelessness and that discussion reminded me of my own experience with the "new faces of homelessness," especially during time time I was the Veteran Services Coordinator at Operation Stand Down Nasvhille, Inc(OSDN).

Prior to working for OSDN, I was providing street outreach for a co-occuring service provider and in that capacity, was working primarily with the folks most people immediately think of when they think of the stereotypical image of someone experiencing homelessness.  Since I would certainly have been considered one of those "stereotypical" individuals prior to entering my own recovery back in 1999, I know first-hand that they are far from the stigmatized view so many have, since each one of those individuals comes to the table with a life, loved ones who care or at least once cared, and none ever saw their lives travel the course that left them destitute, homeless, and broken on a city street.

To be sure, plenty of the veterans experiencing homelessness I worked with at OSDN would have- and have been - inappropriately "stereotyped" and as a result stigmatized because of their appearance.  But something else was happening at OSDN as we moved into 2010 that provoked emotions of fear and trepidation among many who had for a long time been working with those experiencing homelessness and had seen a lot of misery and heard a lot of sad stories.

That "something else" was a frighteningly large wave of couples and families who, to the very last one, would always start their client intake with, "I've worked all my life and never thought this would happen to me." This "wave" continues crashing down upon direct service providers across all areas of our community, but what made it particularly powerful to those of us at OSDN was that we were dealing with veterans, and veterans who'd been actively engaged in work, community and family for their entire lives.

That these veterans, who were well connected, had well established networks of support and employment resources, and even qualified to receive preferential hiring status in some jobs were suddenly out of work and desperately seeking jobs that were non-existent, was a very scary wake-up call for all of us, indeed.

In 2012, the entire nation has awakened to the new face of homelessness, although ignorance and stigma still abound within many communities and continues to hamper even the most herculean efforts put forth by those currently homeless and struggling to get back on their feet and regain some sense of normalcy in their lives again.

To make matters worse, the federal government has been unable to change policy fast enough to be able to provide critical early assistance to people, exacerbating further the plight of those stuck on the streets as a direct result of a slowed economy and a housing foreclosure crisis.

What this means to them - and to those who provide direct services - is that when families, couples or individuals finally set aside their pride and their longstanding, inculcated sense of self reliance to humble themselves enough to ask for help, they discover that there is very little help available to them beyond some time at a typically filled to capacity shelter. That shelter often splits up the men and women, and can even split up children - especially male children - who reach a particular age and are then regulated out of the shelter with their mom and into the men's shelter.
For most families, this is simply unacceptable, since they've been clinging to each other for strength and comfort since they began experiencing problems.

For single parent women faced with more time on the streets together or sending their oldest son into a men's shelter, just about any mother out there will tell you what the decision is going to be, since mom needs the kids close at hand as they cope and overcome the challenges together. 

All of these new faces realize early on that something is horribly wrong with a system that can't step in with a small level of assistance before they end up homeless on the streets, and then force some of them to wait for months while homeless before they even qualify as 'homeless."  To its credit, HUD has worked to change the definition of "homelessness" and has tried to be more inclusive and proactive by making it slightly easier to intervene earlier. 

But the truth is, by the time most of these families reach the point of qualifying for help, they've left a trail of debt, eviction and default in their wake, which makes extricating themselves from the systemic issues that bring about homelessness that much more challenging to overcome.

Think for a moment about your own response to a job loss; most likely, you'd first go through your savings trying to stay on top of the basic bills (rent, utilities, car payment) as you desperately hunt for a job, and the "non-essential" things would start to fall behind (cable bills, insurance premiums for health and vehicle, healthier foodstuffs, etc).  As the month ends with no job offer in sight and your savings starts showing severe signs of depletion, you begin trying to work deals with your creditors, only to find that because you haven't yet received eviction or turnoff notices, you don't yet qualify. At about the three month mark, the eviction and turnoff notices arrive, and if you're unaware of the timing of application for local community assistance sources, chances are that by the time you learn they are available to assist you, they're out of funds for the month.

Now, with credit ruined, turnoff notices for essential utilities stacked on the table, and forced removal from your residence imminent, you begin to consider government social services.  But even if you're lucky enough to actually qualify, the application period can take up to 90 days to begin receiving food stamps, and the days of big welfare checks are long gone, so this is not going to help you catch up on your utility bills and your rent.

Finally the day comes, the Sheriff arrives and sets you, your family and the possessions you have left after you've pawned and yard-saled everything you had of value,  onto the curb, destitute, terrified, and trying to keep some dignity and hope alive for the rest of your family. With all pride long since stripped away, you humbly try to find someone - anyone - that might be able to help you, because surely that lavish safety net we hear the politicians saying needs to be reduced further has some help available to you.

Unfortunately, there's not a lot we as providers can offer you yet.  Your efforts to sustain yourself, you discover, have worked against you, and you discover that the safety net you thought protected those who'd hit bottom has been so gutted that the only assistance available is typically for the most vulnerable, the "chronically" homeless, the addicted, the severely mental ill.  To reach this eligibility, you realize that things are going to have to get worse, much worse, before you have a chance at making them better, and for many, this is the last straw.

If there is any bright spot to any of this, it is that many of these people will succeed in spite of the challenges they face, because they are inculcated and determined and motivated to do so.  And what they will remember about this experience is that we as a nation have failed to ensure that our safety net works for everyone, and not just the very worst of the worst.  These people traditionally vote, and they also speak out, both of which they will be doing as they recover their dignity and their lives over the next several years.  And they will remember how hard it was for them, and I'm counting on the fact that these people will be the ones who help drive our public policy in the proper direction, so that anyone who finds themselves facing homelessness has options long before they ever have to begin the slide into it.

New Face Of Homelessness: The American Family

A new study reveals a new face of homelessness in a deepening foreclosure and economic crisis: the American family. Host Guy Raz tells the story of three families who have faced homelessness in the past year. Raz also speaks to Maria Foscarinis of the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.


GUY RAZ, host:
From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Guy Raz.
If you look at the year in economic statistics, you could tell two different stories of two different Americas. The Dow Jones Industrial Average reached a two-year high this week: retail sales, industrial production, factory orders, all are up. And the biggest corporations are posting healthy profits. And yet, hidden among all these trends is one that was released this past week by the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
In 2010, cities across America saw a 9 percent increase in the number of families seeking emergency shelter. One out of 200 people in America slept in a homeless shelter this past year. The homeless crisis now affects more families, people who just a year or two ago had jobs, apartments, relatively stable lives that affects more families in that any other time in recent history.
And so on this Christmas Day, we bring you the stories of three of those families: the Gibsons from Washington, D.C.; the Stewarts from Salt Lake City, Utah; and the Browns, also from Utah.
We start with the story of Jamie Stewart(ph).
Ms. JAMIE STEWART: I have to be here with my daughter and grandson. I mean, not being able to have our own house and - because I know I'm better - well, not better than that, but I mean, I know I can do it. It's just - the work is just hard after hard. You know, you go to an (unintelligible), there's 15 people there. And (unintelligible) always is to having my own place and being able to provide for my family, which I can't right now.
RAZ: Jamie Stewart lives in the shelter for homeless families with her 18-year-old daughter Emilia(ph) and Emilia's 3-month-old son in Salt Lake City. You just heard Emilia patting his back in that clip.
Jamie left Arizona earlier this year with Emilia and the baby to tend to her dying father in Utah. They lived with her sister for a few weeks; eventually in a car for another week. Jamie thought she'd find a job pretty quickly. She's a nurse, and maybe getting apartment. But she hasn't, except for some seasonal work with UPS.
Ms. STEWART: It's sad. In the first place, I don't have, you know, we don't have our own place. We don't have it free. I just haven't really even thought about the holidays. I haven't. I'm not shopping. I'm not buying for anybody. I'm not - because, of course, I'm saving my money to get a place and to...
Ms. EMILIA STEWART: It's definitely hard just because it's my son's first Christmas and we can't really celebrate out. We can't really buy him the things that we need for him. And so definitely makes it a lot harder knowing and having to look at my mom and not watch her open Christmas presents, Christmas morning and (unintelligible) people say that they know how it is. They - but they don't.
So I tend to ask them, have you ever looked down at your 3-month-year-old son not knowing where you're going to be next, or if you're going to have a roof over your head, or diapers to put on him, or a bottle to feed him? It's hard.
RAZ: That's Jamie and Emilia Stewart in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Mr. DAVID BROWN: My name is David Brown. I'm 31. I'm living currently out here in Magna, Utah.
RAZ: Exactly a year ago, David Brown lost his job at Wal-Mart. And for most of this year, David and his wife Nicole and their four kids, 11-year-old Chloe, 9-year-old Seth, 5-year-old Cameron, and J.J.(ph) who's 2, have been homeless.
Mr. BROWN: You know, we were avoiding the actual shelter itself at all cost. You know, staying with family member here or family member there, ending up staying in the pop-up trailer in your friend's driveway. You know, we were doing pretty much everything we had to to avoid the shelter.
RAZ: At one point, the whole family slept in their van.
Mr. BROWN: You know, when you're in that type of situation, it's not easy to sleep because, you know, kids are scared, of course, and, you know, that's who you're there for, is you're there to let the children know that everything is going to be okay and you're not going to let anything happen.
So, you know, constant cars driving by, you never know what's about to happen. If, you know, someone's looking the brake into a car and they'd stop in the pit the wrong one, you know? So I'd remember there was like very little to no sleep at all. I think I slept maybe a total of 45 minutes.
RAZ: The family did end up in the shelter for sometime. Luckily, David Brown found a job a few months ago, and the family now lives in an apartment in Magna, Utah.
Mr. BROWN: You know, there's a lot of things you look at in life and there's a lot of times in life where you would look at a situation, and that's the first thing that comes in your head, and that happened to me, you know? And I can honestly say that as far as being homeless, I was one of those skeptics that believed it will never happen to me.
You just never know where life's going to take you. And you may think that everything is fine and great one day and wake up the next and have everything passed down around you. And it's possible to (unintelligible).
Mr. ANTONIO GIBSON: My name is Antonio Gibson. I'm 28 years old. And I reside in Washington, D.C.
RAZ: Statistically, Antonio Gibson doesn't even exist. It's not often academic studies or towering speeches are devoted to single black fathers. Antonio raises his two kids, 9-year-old Navia(ph) and 3-year-old Antonio Jr., by himself.
Last year, the mother of his two kids left after she lost her job at Bank of America. At the time, Antonio was a part-time janitor. He cleaned floors at NASA headquarters at night.
Mr. GIBSON: I tried to, with my part-time job, maintain the bills and the household and all the other necessities. But after a while, I guess it became a little bit too much, and we've gotten debt with the rent and with other bills and everything and we received our very first eviction threat.
RAZ: That was last November. And for most of the past 13 months, Antonio, Navia and Antonio Jr. lived in a car. He would tell Navia that they were camping or that the house was being renovated. He tried to find temporary housing, but all of them were full. And each time, he was turned away.
So at night, Antonio would park the car in the garage of an abandoned house. He'd crack the windows for ventilation and say goodnight to his kids.
Mr. GIBSON: Looking in the backseat while they were sleeping in the car, it was just breaking me down, emotionally and mentally, you know? And I can also see a change in my daughter, you know, like she didn't talk no more. She was afraid to go to school, you know? And she always loves school since she was like 5 years old. So I just saw their big change, and then I knew that that's where it was coming from.
I would wake up at 7 a.m. in the morning and (unintelligible) tap water to (unintelligible), wash our face, brush our teeth or try to change their clothes. And I'll first drop my daughter off to her school at 8 o'clock. And drop my son off the daycare around 8, 8:30.
You know, I used to read them a story in the car, little books. They have this thing at my son's school called lending library, where you can get a book every day, bring it back every day. So, and we get a different book every day, and it was cool because they would go to sleep real easy with that, you know? So that was my daily routine.
RAZ: After 11 months in the car, the Gibsons finally managed to get a place through the city's Housing Authority. He's on food stamps now and paying rent with help from a local church.
Now, a moment ago, I mentioned new figures that show a 9 percent increase in homeless families in cities across America this year.
Maria Foscarinis with the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty says as dramatic as that number sounds, it's probably even higher.
Ms. MARIA FOSCARINIS (Founder/Executive Director, National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty): Because what they are measuring is numbers of families who are seeking emergency shelter.
RAZ: Showing up at shelters.
Ms. FOSCARINIS: Yes. And so by definition, that number is limited by existing shelter capacity, which we know is grossly insufficient to meet a need. The national estimate is that only about half of all homeless people are actually sheltered, and that's due to lack of shelter capacity.
RAZ: How do budget cuts in states and municipalities begin to make the problem worse? Because, of course, we haven't really seen the full impact of this budget cuts yet.
Ms. FOSCARINIS: Exactly. Just this week, the D.C. City Council, since we're here in Washington, the local government passed a law that limits services here in Washington to people who can prove that they're D.C. residents. And this is supremely ironic and misconceived in our view because a big problem when you're homeless is you don't have ID, or it becomes very difficult to prove residency. But it's an indicator of the city trying to conserve its own resources.
RAZ: You're hearing reports of homeless shelters having to turn people away very, very frequently.
Ms. FOSCARINIS: Absolutely. And the U.S. Conference of Mayors report that was just released earlier this week show - said that 27 percent of requests for emergency shelter on average were turned away.
RAZ: Twenty-seven percent.
Ms. FOSCARINIS: On average. And again, this is likely understating the problem, because at a certain point, people just give up.
RAZ: I mean, realistically, what could be done over the next two years? I mean, you're well aware that Congress is on a budget-cutting kick, the American public is demanding this. What can be done to begin to tackle this issue?
Ms. FOSCARINIS: Budget is obviously critical and it's really a matter of where our priorities are as a nation. So I think we know that if something is considered important, money can be found and money can be spent.
Banks were considered too big to fail. Well, I think we have to start thinking that in a country, such as the United States, that allowing people to be homeless, allowing children to go without a place to lay their heads at night is not something we will tolerate, and we have to be able to find the money to stop that, to ensure that everybody has a place to live.
RAZ: That's Maria Foscarinis. She is the executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty here in Washington, D.C.
Maria, thank you for being here.
Ms. FOSCARINIS: Thank you, Guy.
RAZ: If you're interested in finding out more about the groups that have helped the families we heard from earlier in the segment, here are a few websites: The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless helped Antonio Gibson find public housing. They're at legalclinic.org. Family Promise helped the Browns and Stewarts. They're at fpsl.org. And thanks to Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., for helping us this week with the story. You can find their website at catholiccharitiesdc.org.
You're listening to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News.
Copyright © 2010 National Public Radio. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to National Public Radio. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Related NPR Stories

Advice From A Homeless Man: Holiday Givers Need To Coordinate Nov. 23,


Mills: The new face of homelessness

quot;These days poverty is less and less a
Photo credit: Donna Grethen / Tribune Media Services | "These days poverty is less and less a remote phenomenon," writes Nicolaus Mills. 

She has picked the perfect spot to be noticed -- right between a subway stop and an upscale deli on New York's Upper West Side. But she seems to crave privacy. Never does she initiate eye contact. Never does she start a conversation. Her preference is to sit quietly on a foot stool reading a book.
Yet more often than not, the aluminum beverage cup that sits in front of her stool has dollar bills in it.
I have given her some of those dollars. "God bless you," she said once. Another time, it was simply "Thank you."

MORE: Analysis and discussion from Viewsday | Newsday columnists | More opinion
CARTOONS: Walt Handelsman's Cartoons | National Cartoon Roundup

The homeless men who in the past asked for handouts on the same block did not do so well. They rarely got more quarters than nickels. Even holding the door open for the customers of a nearby bagel shop rarely worked for them.
The woman to whom I and others walking along this Upper West Side sidewalk having been giving dollar bills looks different from the homeless men she has replaced. She is tastefully dressed. Her gray hair is clean. She doesn't talk to herself. She is white.
She is the new face of homelessness, and from what I can tell, her presence frightens passersby. They see themselves in her, and they are right to do so. "Homeless, Scared, and Hungry" she wrote one day on a cardboard sign she put next to her stool. It was easy to believe her.
These days poverty is less and less a remote phenomenon. In the last decade, those living under the poverty line in the suburbs grew by 66 percent while the overall suburban population barely changed. Even having a job is no guarantee of staying out of poverty any longer; 7.2 percent of those the government says are employed are living below the poverty line, and 150 million Americans are no more than two paychecks away from falling into poverty. In our high cost-of-living region, the stakes can be even higher.
In the case of the woman on the stool, it is hard to imagine that she became homeless through her own fault. Her neat appearance and visible shyness make it seem more likely that terrible luck, rather than a personal failing or mental illness, is the source of her trouble. She resembles a kindly aunt who has, for the moment, sat down to rest on a hot summer day.
I hope she keeps getting dollars rather than loose change. But I worry that the dollar donations I am talking about say something terrible about the way we have in the past stereotyped homelessness. It should not take a middle-class-appearing woman asking for money to jar us into giving.
During the Great Depression John Steinbeck in "The Grapes of Wrath" and James Agee and Walker Evans in "Let Us Now Praise Famous Men" took us inside the heads of the poor, making sure we didn't just see them as anonymous Okies or faceless sharecroppers. We have lost that egalitarian sensibility, and we need to get it back. If it takes a woman who looks as if she has always had a roof over her head to help accelerate that change, so be it.
Anything is better than the quiet racism that let so many passersby pay scant attention to the African-American homeless people who, in the past, dominated this small New York block.

8.29.2012

Dispelling the Myth: "it often seems that placing homeless people in shelters is the most inexpensive way to meet the basic needs of people experiencing homelessness; some may even believe that shelters are an ideal solution." WRONG

I've been butting up against a familiar situation for anyone who works with people experiencing homelessness; a low or fixed income person or family who was once homeless received some sort of income or assistance through SSDI or SSI, obtained housing because they were homeless and  as such received "priority" status for that housing, and now needs to find new housing for some reason (in my most recent case, the owner is selling the property for commercial development).

But the game rules have changed for them because the person(s) who need to find a place to go aren't considered "homeless" so have no priority attached to their status.  Because waiting lists are beyond ridiculously long, they won't see an option to move into an affordable unit until somewhere around 2015, and I'm not kidding, here.  I can also tell you that readers of this post in some cities will be wishing they lived here in order to take advantage of the short (relatively speaking, of course) wait times we're "enjoying" in the Nashville area.  I kid you not about this, either.  You can rest assured that even the most compassionate and understanding landlord will be unable to accommodate a request to wait years for the current resident to find another place.

Many of the folks who find themselves trapped in this conundrum will wind up homeless - again. And many in our communities will complain that they're tired of supporting those who are homeless.  And many charged with ending homelessness in those communities are now conditioned to ignore the fact that a human being is living without the most basic and necessary need a human can have, shelter, and quote the federal regs related to who qualifies - and who doesn't - as "homeless," using that rationale to deny the person from access to an affordable housing unit.

This is the "status quo" of homelessness and the housing situation as we know it today for a very large number of people and cities. My point in bringing this all to your attention is to also call attention to a couple of things related to this, the very first being a response (articulately crafted by the National Alliance to End Homelessness, [NAEH] - thank you so much guys!) to those who are "tired of supporting" those on trying to exist on the streets - please read the short but important piece below by the good folks at NAEH.

My second response is to my fellow direct service providers and the administrative team that leads the organization they are a part of.  I know that money is an issue for all of us. I know too that often our hands are tied and we are required to follow federal (as well as any state and local) regulations when we're working to provide options to those requesting our services.  But something else I know is that after we do this kind of work day in, day out, for years, we become immune, hardened, often cynical to the stories we hear from those who are desperate for housing.

Because we've had to deliver bad news so many times to those who had their hopes up when they first walked through the door, we've had to learn to turn off our emotional connection to the fact that we're dealing with human beings or risk our own health and sanity in the process. This slide down the callousness slope  is easier than one might think, unfortunately, and it's not that unusual, either.  It's a protective mechanism that kicks in when those charged with ending the misery of homelessness find out that more often than not they really can't do much for the person sitting across from them.  It's a terrible position to put otherwise compassionate humans into, because I can almost guarantee that when they first sat down at their desk and began their jobs, they came to the job committed and convinced that they would be able to make a difference. Very few people I know are working in this field "for the money" because frankly, most of us who're working are not much better off than the clientele we serve if we're solely reliant on the income we earn from our jobs.

My two points collide here, into a neat little piece of enlightenment.  Those complaining about the costs associated with getting folks off the street should join forces with those who are charged with finding affordable housing - as well as those who make the rules related to who gets affordable housing - and work together to put the money we're spending on homelessness in general to better use.   We've definitely got solutions and approaches that are far superior to the current style of "managing homelessness" so many cities and towns currently employ.

By combining forces and focusing our efforts, we all get what we need.  The truth is, it doesn't really matter to the folks who're eking out their existence on the streets what the motives are behind those who're trying to remove them from the bricks, it only matters where they are going when they are forced to "move along."  By collaborating and refocusing the priorities to the best use of our increasingly limited tax dollars, everyone - and especially those who are currently homeless - goes home happy at the end of the day. 

What more could we all ask for?

Cost of Homelessness

Homelessness can be surprisingly costly for taxpayers. Fortunately, socially-responsible, cost-effective solutions exist.
For many city officials, community leaders, and even direct service providers, it often seems that placing homeless people in shelters is the most inexpensive way to meet the basic needs of people experiencing homelessness; some may even believe that shelters are an ideal solution.
Research, however, has shown something surprisingly different.
The cost of homelessness can be quite high. Hospitalization, medical treatment, incarceration, police intervention, and emergency shelter expenses can add up quickly, making homelessness surprisingly expensive for municipalities and taxpayers.
Hospitalization and Medical Treatment
People experiencing homelessness are more likely to access the most costly health care services.
  • According to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine, homeless people spent an average of four days longer per hospital visit than comparable non-homeless people. This extra cost, approximately $2,414 per hospitalization, is attributable to homelessness.
  • A study of hospital admissions of homeless people in Hawaii revealed that 1,751 adults were responsible for 564 hospitalizations and $4 million in admission costs. Their rate of psychiatric hospitalization was over 100 times higher than their non-homeless cohort. The researchers conducting the study estimate that the excess cost for treating these homeless individuals was $3.5 million or about $2,000 per person.
Homelessness both causes and results from serious health care issues, including addiction, psychological disorders, HIV/AIDS, and a host of order ailments that require long-term, consistent care. Homelessness inhibits this care, as housing instability often detracts from regular medical attention, access to treatment, and recuperation. This inability to treat medical problems can aggravate these problems, making them both more dangerous and more costly.
As an example, physician and health care expert Michael Siegel found that the average cost to cure an alcohol-related illness is approximately $10,660. Another study found that the average cost to California hospitals of treating a substance abuser is about $8,360 for those in treatment, and $14,740 for those who are not.
Prisons and Jails
People who are homeless spend more time in jail or prison, which is tremendously costly to the state and locality. Often, time served is a result of laws specifically targeting the homeless population, including regulations against loitering, sleeping in cars, and begging.
  • According to a University of Texas two-year survey of homeless individuals, each person cost the taxpayers $14,480 per year, primarily for overnight jail.
  • A typical cost of a prison bed in a state or federal prison is $20,000 per year.
Emergency Shelter
Emergency shelter is a costly alternative to permanent housing. While it is sometimes necessary for short-term crises, too often it serves as long-term housing. The cost of an emergency shelter bed funded by HUD's Emergency Shelter Grants program is approximately $8,067 more than the average annual cost of a federal housing subsidy (Section 8 Housing Certificate). A recent HUD study found that the cost of providing emergency shelter to families is generally as much or more than the cost of placing them in transitional or permanent housing.
Cost Studies
Studies have shown that – in practice, and not just in theory – providing people experiencing chronic homelessness with permanent supportive housing saves taxpayers money.
Permanent supportive housing refers to permanent housing coupled with supportive services.
  • A study recent study followed the progress of the Downtown Emergency Service Center (DESC) in Seattle, WA. All the residents at this Housing First-styled residence had severe alcohol problems and varying medical and mental health conditions. When taking into account all costs – including housing costs – the participants in the 1811 Eastlake program cost $2,449 less per person per month than those who were in conventional city shelters, as described in the article from the Journal of American Medical Association.
  • A cost study of rural homelessness from Portland, ME found significant cost reductions when providing permanent supportive housing as opposed to serving the people while they remain homeless. The study specifically noted a 57 percent reduction in the cost of mental health services over a six-month period, partly due to a 79 percent drop in the cost of psychiatric hospitalization.
  • A study from Los Angeles, CA – home to ten percent of the entire homeless population – found that placing four chronically homeless people into permanent supportive housing saved the city more than $80,000 per year.
For more information on the cost savings of permanent supportive housing, view our policy brief on chronic homelessness or visit our interactive tool on the subject.
While seemingly counterintuitive, these examples clearly demonstrate that a housing-based approach to homelessness is not only more cost-effective than a shelter-based approach, but more effective in the long term. By focusing our resources on ending homelessness, we can make real progress toward eradicating the social problem while helping the country's most vulnerable residents.
References
  • Salit S.A., Kuhn E.M., Hartz A.J., Vu J.M., Mosso A.L. Hospitalization costs associated with homelessness in New York City. New England Journal of Medicine 1998; 338: 1734-1740.
  • Martell J.V., Seitz R.S., Harada J.K., Kobayashi J., Sasaki V.K., Wong C. Hospitalization in an urban homeless population: the Honolulu Urban Homeless Project. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992; 116:299-303.
  • Rosenheck, R., Bassuk, E., Salomon, A., Special Populations of Homeless Americans, Practical Lessons: The 1998 National Symposium on Homelessness Research, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, US Department of Health and Human Services, August, 1999.
  • From the website of the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, May 8, 2000.
  • Diamond, Pamela and Steven B. Schneed, Lives in the Shadows: Some of the Costs and Consequences of a "Non-System" of Care. Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 1991. 6Slevin, Peter, Life After Prison: Lack of Services Has High Price. The Washington Post, April 24, 2000.
  • Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Evaluation of the Emergency Shelter Grants Program, Volume 1: Findings September 1994. p 91.
  • Abt Assocaites, et al, Costs Associated With First-Time Homelessness For Families and Individuals, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, March 23, 2010.

8.28.2012

"Social media like Twitter and Facebook tear down economic and geographic barriers to help homeless people connect to their families and support networks"

This information comes as no surprise to people like Mark Horvath or Carey Fuller, since they've been using social media for years now to connect people experiencing homelessness to each other, support services, and family members who'd like to find out what's happening with a loved one.

Even the Federal government, typically far behind the curve of everyone else on most things related to the public, is beginning to realize the enormous potential of social media in helping raise awareness, put access to services at the fingertips of those who need them, and provide information and resources that help improve the odds that a person will be able to extricate themselves from the street and the poverty -however that may be induced - that keeps them there.

One point I'd like to make in order to help dispel some ignorance around this issue that I see crop up with frightening regularity is the idea that those on the street are somehow either too dumb or too poor to be able to have a phone, and especially a smartphone.  Typically these kinds of comments arise when there is a photo somewhere - in a newspaper, for example - that shows someone experiencing homelessness talking on or holding a phone.  Generally, the comments are something along the lines of "if they've got a phone, then they should have a job and home," or "if they've got a phone then they can't be too poor."

So here's the deal.  First, there are several programs available in certain areas and regions of the US that provide free phones to people in poverty, homeless or not.  These phones, while generally low-end devices, come with a set level of minutes (between 70 and 300, typically)and those minutes renewed each month.   Contrary to the grossly ignorant complaints about these phones  being a "luxury, not a necessity," phones are hugely important for folks in dire, sometimes critical need for survival and help them connect with available services; locate employment; provide a callback number to potential employers that isn't immediately suspect (local mission and shelter numbers are usually quickly recognized and when used to on applications, which are then roundfiled); connect them with family and friends who may be able to help, offer hope, or offer assistance; and connect with emergency services when situations become dangerous or untenable due to inclement weather.

Two quick examples that help dispel the myth and smash the ignorance: 1. "JoJo" earns about $670 a month on SSDI, far too little for him to remain housed for any length of time, so he lives in the woods near Nashville.  He's well known in the areas he treks, and does odd jobs at various shops and stores to earn a little extra cash and some favors (one gas station gives him a pack of cigarettes if he sweeps off the area around the pumps, another opens a storage room when the weather is bad so he has a place to ride it out).  Folks often find JoJo hanging at the local McDonalds or Waffle House charging his smartphone and sipping coffee, and If ever there was a person who "looks" homeless, JoJo fits the stereotypical image, as he hasn't shaved in probably two decades, doesn't care much about the condition of his clothes and replaces them by purchasing new stuff at Goodwill or the Salvation Army Thrift when his current clothes are either so dirty or in such tatters that he can't stand them any longer. I can almost guarantee you that when the ignorant and uninformed see him sitting in a booth at MickyD's, sipping his coffee and surfing away on his T-Mobile powered smartphone, they immediately jump to the wrong conclusions, since most of the time, JoJo is either dealing with his numerous health issues, finding places to work part-time, or chatting with friends and family around the region, from Tennessee to Florida. He pays his own bill, buys the phone he wants, and if you know anything at all about SSDI, you know he's using the money he earned himself.

"Jimmy" is a Gulf War veteran who has been struggling with a number of combat-related health conditions for years. He has been fighting with an increase in his benefits with the VA - not an uncommon situation for many veterans - and has been surviving on a pittance while living in a cubbyhole near some railroad tracks in South Nashville.  He works day labor 2-3 days a week and gets most of his supplies from a veteran service center that provides clothing and basic necessities/toiletries. Jimmy also looks like the stereotypical person many of the uninformed think of when they think of someone homeless, yet Jimmy is fiercely independent, a Godfearing and honest man to a fault, and lives in shame every day that he is unable to take care of himself due to his multiple injuries and illnesses suffered while defending his country. I helped Jimmy get a free phone after he missed an opportunity for an early appointment at the VA, and he missed it because although the VA caseworker had a cancellation that created an early opening for him, we all were unable to notify him in time to make the appointment. 

So the next time you see someone you think is homeless standing on a corner using their phone, rather than become righteously indignant, be thankful, because the fact is, the more we connect our folks on the street with the community, the more likely it is we'll be able to get them back into the community, and the less likely it is we'll have to continue paying for the costs incurred from a life on the streets.

Homeless find support on Facebook, Twitter

7:57 PM, Aug 26, 2012
SOCIAL SERVICES
Getty Images
Here’s something everyone can “like”: Social media fosters community, even for those who don’t have a home.
A new study finds social media like Twitter and Facebook tear down economic and geographic barriers to help homeless people connect to their families and support networks.
The study was conducted by Art Jipson, a sociologist and criminologist at the University of Dayton, a Catholic school. Jipson says the findings present a new potential for Catholic social teaching.
“Catholic social teaching expresses a concern about’a communal, social nature’ where’we are called to reach out and build relationships of love and justice,’” Jipson said.
He cites “Rerum Novarum,” Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical on the duties of government and citizens in creating a just society, as the context and foundation of his work.
Jipson’s study, “Shall I Paint You a Protest: Marxist Analysis of Social Media,” was presented August 17 at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in Denver.
He found that homeless people leverage free services like Facebook and Twitter to find food, shelter and job services, and to keep up with family and friends. All they need is a smart phone or public library with Internet access.
“People think of Facebook as this billion-dollar entity with stock offerings that sells gobs of advertising,” Jipson said. “But, on Facebook, the’least of our brothers,’ as it says in the Bible, have equal access to all of Facebook’s offerings and establish a sense of belonging that is based on more than possessions.”
Jipson created his study after a homeless man won a prize on Jipson’s weekly radio show. When Jipson hand-delivered the prize, a CD, he discovered the man used his smart phone to stream radio and connect with people on Facebook.
For the study, Jipson spoke with 14 homeless people about their social media usage.
“Why can’t I be on Facebook?” asked one subject in the study. “I have as much right to that as anyone else. Just because I am homeless does not mean that I don’t care about this stuff, you know? My family is on Facebook. My friends are on Facebook. People who care about me are on Facebook.”Another interviewee said social media offered a judgment-free place to connect: “No one on the’net cares if I didn’t get a shower yesterday or smell some. They don’t judge me, you know? … I feel accepted. I am accepted.”
Sister Mary Ann Walsh, director of media relations for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, noted that advances in communications technology have created a more equitable sharing of the world’s resources, from the invention of the printing press to radio and television to the Internet.
Along the way, religion has made its mark on each platform, she said. The first book off Johannes Guttenberg’s press was the Bible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen hosted “The Catholic Hour” radio show and went on to host television programs.
New generations of Catholics can watch Sheen’s sermons on YouTube or download his radio addresses as podcasts. Or they can hear them over the USCCB website.
All these experiences, Jipson said, foster community.
“We assume that we have nothing in common with people who are different from us — by whatever means we might measure that difference,” Jipson said. “But a study like this demonstrates that we have more in common than we do in difference.”

8.24.2012

Philadelphia Perpetuates the Myth To Clamp Down On Public Feedings of the City's Most Vulnerable and Poor

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter has yanked a page straight out of the old "Quality of Life" crimes playbook to inflict some shiny new misery on people who are already challenged to survive on a daily basis.

Waaaayyy back in November 2007, the National Coalition for the Homeless (NCH) and the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty (the Law Center) worked collaboratively to publish Feeding Intolerance: Prohibitions on Sharing Food with People Experiencing Homelessness. Back then, they provided a spreadsheet that listed the US cities that had some sort of ordinance or ban on street feeding:
 Almost 6 years later, not much has changed and in fact, this spreadsheet is woefully outdated today because a number of new cities need to be added, including Nashville and now, Philly (and Nashville initiated theirs so long ago that it's barely worth mentioning and is only listed here because I happen to live here). 

Why, you might ask, are Mayors like Nutter still justifying their actions years later based on debunked excuses for implementing punitive measures on peeps who are hungry?

Well, Mayors across the country participate each year via via The U.S. Conference of Mayors’ Task Force on Hunger and Homelessness, and they strategize on how best to eradicate homelessness.  The U.S. Conference of Mayors is the official nonpartisan (supposedly, anyway) organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. There are 1,139 such cities in the country today, each represented in the Conference by its chief elected official, the Mayor.



Now I would really like to think that all these participating Mayors were honestly interested in ending homelessness by providing real options for their city and the people who're experiencing perhaps one of the most traumatic and challenging times of their lives. This real policy change is accomplished by promoting housing-first strategies and approaches for the city's most vulnerable, ensuring a well-trained staff of direct service providers, and facilitating a collaborative and coordinated cross-agency effort that utilizes evidence-based and promising practices empirically proven to end - not manage - homelessness. 

But I also know that these approaches are not always fully embraced by communities - at first, anyway.  And money is tight in every city, as we're all painfully aware.  I also know that trying to navigate through the political land mines saturating the field of social policy choices bring with it high risk for those who're considering pushing upstream against the currents of the mighty river of Status Quo. 

I've got more than a sneaking suspicion that because these risks, should they go bad, have very high consequences to the good Mayors; and because those experiencing homelessness don't contribute to campaigns; nor are they typically a block of courted voters, since they don't usually vote (with any regularity, anyway); our Mayors tend to take a path of least resistance in terms of potential political ramifications and execute the "end" of homelessness through illusion, rather than through good, solid systemic policy change. 

And that path of least resistance seems to usually culminate in the Mayor of a given city, in this most recent case, Philadelphia, the "City of Brotherly Love," trotting out these lame justifications for the enactment of quality of life criminalization measures rather than to tackle the real issues related to the systemic problems that often lie at the root of an individual's homelessness, hunger, and poverty....    

Posted at 02:37 PM ET, 08/23/2012

In Philadelphia parks, churches fight to feed the homeless

Church ministries have been feeding homeless people in Philadelphia’s public parks for decades – not as a charitable gesture, but as an act of faith.
But earlier this year, city officials passed an ordinance banning public feeding of groups of more than three people in any city park – taking care, of course, to exempt city-sanctioned special events, family picnics and other gatherings the city finds more palatable.
The law targets church groups and charities that give meals to the homeless on land along the Benjamin Franklin Parkway, home to major museums such as the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the newly opened Barnes Foundation art collection.
Why make it so hard to feed the homeless in the City of Brotherly Love?
Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter’s official explanation for the ban is that he wants to move feeding the homeless inside (though the city is vague about how or when this will happen). Moreover, the city argues, church feeding programs are health hazards that create a mess in the park. The mayor offered part of the plaza surrounding City Hall as a temporary alternative location.
Religious leaders dismiss the city’s objections to meal distribution in public parks as bogus, pointing out that no one has gotten sick from the food distributed and volunteers clean up the space used. Moreover, many of the homeless who live in the park are reluctant to travel elsewhere (leaving their few possessions) – and some are too disabled to do so.
According to critics of the law, the real reason for the ban is the proximity of the feeding programs to tourist attractions, especially the new $150 million building housing the Barnes Foundation collection that opened in May.
To stop the law from taking effect, religious groups (with support from the American Civil Liberties Union) filed suit in federal court charging that prohibiting churches from feeding the homeless in city parks violates religious freedom ( Chosen 300 Ministries, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia).
The city responded by claiming that because the law “imposes no restrictions upon praying or preaching or reading the Gospel or engaging with the homeless,” the ban on feeding doesn’t interfere with the churches’ right to practice their faith.
In July, U.S. District Judge William H. Yohn, Jr., rejected the city’s argument and granted a temporary injunction barring implementation of the law. In a written opinion issued two weeks ago explaining his order, the judge wrote that government has no business ascribing some of the churches’ religious activities more religious significance than others.
To support his conclusion that the park feeding ban violated the religious freedom of the ministries, Yohn relied not on the First Amendment, as might be expected, but on the Pennsylvania Religious Freedom Protection Act.
That’s because the U.S. Supreme Court weakened the protections of the First Amendment’s free exercise clause in 1990, declaring that government no longer had to show a compelling state interest before denying religious exemptions to generally applicable government laws that substantially burden the free exercise of religion ( Employment Division v. Smith ).
In response to the court’s 1990 ruling, some states – including Pennsylvania – have passed legislation restoring the “compelling interest” test.
According to Yohn, Philadelphia’s public feeding ban would likely fail that test because the city has not shown that governmental interests are strong enough to override religious freedom in this case. Moreover, the city has not provided a truly viable alternative for relocating the feeding programs.
Philadelphia is not the only city trying to move homeless people and those who serve them out of public parks. According to the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, more than 50 other cities have passed anti-camping and anti-feeding ordinances.
Nutter is appealing the court injunction. But whatever happens in the courts, church leaders in Philadelphia promise to keep the meals coming – even if it means defying the law.
After all, when it comes to helping “the least of these,” they believe in obeying a higher law.
By  |  02:37 PM ET, 08/23/2012

8.22.2012

"6,000 students in the Clark County School District will be classified as homeless," "One in every 45 children" experiences homelessness

Why does this not shock the consciences of everyone in our communities?  Are we not outraged that, as the National Center on Family Homelessness (NCFH) points out, that "One in 45 children experience homelessness in America each year.  That's over 1.6 million children."

And the news doesn't get any better, either. The NCHF tells us that:
 While homeless, they experience high rates of acute and chronic health problems.  The constant barrage of stressful and traumatic experience also has profound effects on their development and ability to learn. 

Health

Children experiencing homelessness:
  • Are sick four times more often than other children.[1]  They have:
    • Four times as many respiratory infections.
    • Twice as many ear infections.
    • Five times more gastrointestinal problems.
    • Four times more likely to have asthma.
  • Go hungry at twice the rate of other children.1
  • Have high rates of obesity due to nutritional deficiencies.2
  • Have three times the rate of emotional and behavioral problems compared to non-homeless children.3

Experiences of Violence

Violence plays a major role in the lives of homeless children.4
  • By age 12, 83% had been exposed to at least one serious violent event.
  • Almost 25% have witnessed acts of violence within their families.

Developmental Milestones and Academic Performance

Children experiencing homelessness are:
  • Four times more likely to show delayed development.
  • Twice as likely to have learning disabilities as non-homeless children.
Our lack of interest and concern outside of a small circle of champions who keep this issue alive and in the forefront of social issues as much as possible - think Dr. Ellen Bassuk (Dr. Bassuk is also the President and Founder of the NCHF), Pat LaMarche, and Diane Nilan - is beyond inexcusable, and I think there is something about the word "homeless" in front of "children" that instantly changes how people view the issue. Even though we're not talking here about society's stereotypical -and grossly inaccurate - image of the average homeless person, the word homeless has such negative mental imagery associated with it that I wonder if folks immediately tune out after hearing it.

I think more frustrating than the ignorance and apathy of our fellow citizens is the lack of action by those who are supposed to be "representing" us, and both political parties are guilty of this gross insouciance.  It doesn't take a genius to understand why; poor folk and homeless children aren't typically big spenders on politicians, since they're usually too busy trying to figure out how to buy enough food to eat for the day rather than wondering which talking head they should give their hard to come by pennies to.

We think nothing at all of giving away " $51.6 billion" to other countries to help them, and justifying it by arguing that it "supports our allies and partners, prevents conflict, promotes democracy, and reflects our core values."  By the way, this astronomical number makes up "just 1 percent of the U.S. Government’s overall budget."

Those of us charged with ending homelessness in our country can only dream of having access to the resources and direct services $51.6 billion dollars would provide us.   For all the rhetoric spouted on both sides of the political aisle we hear about "protecting our children" and ensuring America's future, my request is a simple one to our politicians; put your money where your mouths are.

If you'd like to help, please consider donating $20 dollars to the Campaign to End Child Homelessness, follow Diane Nilan and Pat LaMarche on Twitter and Facebook, and the next time you hear the words "homeless children" please, for just a a minute, pay a little closer attention. The future of our country really does depend on it. 

8 News NOW

Outreach Program Prepares Homeless Kids for School

Posted: Aug 21, 2012 5:32 PM CDT Updated: Aug 21, 2012 6:10 PM CDT
LAS VEGAS -- When school starts on Monday, more than 6,000 students in the Clark County School District will be classified as homeless. That number is double what it was five years ago.
The kids live in shelters, motels, and sometimes cars. The outreach program, TITLE 1 Hope, is once again giving out backpacks to homeless kids who range in age from 5 to 18-years-old.
The backpacks are filled with everything from school supplies to toiletries. In fact, the group has already handed out some 2,000 backpacks and class doesn't even start until next week.
Organizers say papers, pencils, and books can go a long way to help at risk students succeed.
"If they aren't eating, they are not sleeping, they don't have proper educational tools, there's no way they are going to graduate," said Sue Goldman, TITLE 1 Hope.
Aside from school supplies and toiletries, homeless kids can also get clothes, bus passes and gift cards through the program.

8.21.2012

"Infections in homeless people can lead to community infections and are associated with malnutrition, long periods of homelessness and high use of medical services"

Journalist Kate Kelland is trying to raise some awareness here in order to motivate action - in this case I believe it is for increased access/funding for healthcare for those experiencing homelessness - and for that, I'm exceptionally grateful. I come to this conclusion, since it's not overtly stated, by a quote from Senior Research Fellow Seena Fazel that Kelland included in her piece:
 "Because ... numbers of homeless people are high in some countries, improvements in care could have pronounced effects on public health."

But here's the rub; I can just about guarantee you that, given a large segment of the general public's ignorance about homelessness, there will be some who will use this information to further stigmatize and justify additional ostracism and marginalization of those experiencing homelessness.  Worse, there may be at least some percentage of folks out there who hear this and in their stunted brain, justify violence against those who must endure homelessness, since in their warped thinking, ridding the community of disease harbingers has to  be a good thing, yes?


The last possibility here is particularly disturbing, since we know that violence against those experiencing homelessness has increased dramatically over the past decade. As someone who works regularly to increase awareness of the causes of homelessness on a national level, I know firsthand the level of ignorance that pervades our communities, and it is apparent even within some of the agencies charged with providing direct services to those experiencing homelessness.   

To be sure, efforts abound to ensure that training and knowledge are at the fingertips of those who request it, but stigmatization and erroneous assumptions continue to permeate all areas of our communities when it comes to homelessness.  One need only review the comments left by people around issues related to homelessness in just about any newspaper to understand what I'm talking about, and as a typical example, here is a very recent comment left by someone related to a newspaper article on a Commission charged with implementing the 10-year plan in Nashville, TN:
Jughead on 8/16/12 at 8:19

Let's call them by the correct name: BUMS.
The vast majority are bums by their own acts. Then, liberal do-gooders tell me I have a responsibility to fund their addictions?
Not a chance in hell. I'll fund their departure from Nashville...one way tickets to California.
Clearly, the commentator's "penname" is appropriate, and his gross ignorance, especially given today's new faces of homelessness, is almost unforgivable, but the truth is, there are a large number of "Jugheads" out there, and some of them are not afraid to cross the line and resort to violence.  

My fear with Kelland's piece is that this will provide the perfect incentive and justification to some of the more disturbed Jugheads out there, who will feel a sense of self-righteous indignation that cloaks their scapegoating, and will motivate them into a twisted form of vigilantism, for the good of the community, you understand. 

I do hope I'm wrong, and I like to think the best of human nature.  But it's hard to remain optimistic when year after year, violence against the less fortunate and the homeless seems to increase.  Unfortunately, what never does seem to increase, and in fact has decreased recently, is the funding that provides assistance - including healthcare - to those who need it most and who are most vulnerable in our communities. The Affordable Care Act is one bright spot in an otherwise dismal landscape, and I hope we're able to begin providing the care folks on the street need quickly.  For many, it'll be too little, too late, but for some, it will mean the difference between life and death, both from an illness, and an idiot.

Infections among homeless could fuel wider epidemics: study

August 19, 2012|By Kate Kelland | Reuters

(Eliseo Fernandez, Reuters)
LONDON (Reuters) - Homeless people across the world have dramatically higher rates of infection with tuberculosis (TB), HIV and hepatitis C and could fuel community epidemics that cost governments dear, a study showed on Monday.
With an estimated 650,000 homeless people in the United States and around 380,000 in Britain, experts said high levels of infection would not only cause yet more poverty and distress for those without homes, but could also become a wider problem.
"Infections in homeless people can lead to community infections and are associated with malnutrition, long periods of homelessness and high use of medical services," said Seena Fazel, a senior research fellow in clinical science at the University of Oxford who led the study.
Fazel and his team analyzed more than 40 research papers on levels of HIV, hepatitis C and TB among homeless people from 1984 to 2012.
They found that in the United States, for example, TB rates were at least 46 times greater in the homeless than in the general population, and the prevalence of hepatitis C viral infection was more than four times higher.
In Britain, TB rates were about 34 times higher in homeless people than in the general population, and the prevalence of hepatitis C viral infection was nearly 50 times higher.
For HIV, rates of infection were typically between 1 and 20 times higher in homeless people in the United States than the general population, but no studies were found for Britain.
Fazel said his findings suggested the best way to fight back against these and other infectious diseases was to focus on the homeless as one of the highest risk groups.
"Because ... numbers of homeless people are high in some countries, improvements in care could have pronounced effects on public health," he said.
Fazel, whose study was published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal, said similar patterns were found in most other countries where data were available. Other countries covered in the study included France, India, Sweden, Ireland and Brazil.
According to United Nations estimates, about 100 million people worldwide are homeless. It is well known that rates of illness and premature death are particularly high in this group.
TB kills an estimated 1.4 million people annually, and about 9 million people are newly infected each year around the world.
Because it is a bacterial infection that spreads through the air in droplets when infected people cough and sneeze, it can develop into community outbreaks.
Anyone with active TB can easily infect another 10 to 15 people a year, and because successful treatment for TB requires months of antibiotics, patient care can be expensive.
In the United States, nearly 60,000 new cases of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that causes AIDS are reported nationally every year.
The researchers said this research focused on HIV, Hepatitis C and TB because their initial work suggested these were the most heavily studied infections among homeless populations.
But they noted the homeless also have high rates of other infectious diseases, including hepatitis A and B, diphtheria, foot problems and skin infections.
(Editing by Andrew Heavens)

8.20.2012

Check Out "Street Paper" Documentary About The Contributor

Every time I head into the Nashville area, I am reminded by the prolific sight of vendors on street corners of the wonderful time when Tasha French, Tom Wills, Will Connelly and I got together and began creating, implementing, and writing for The Contributor, Nashville's "Street Newspaper."

Back  in 2007 at the start-up we faced a lot of challenges, in both the homeless and the larger "public" community, but we persevered. We couldn't have done it without the help of some very tenacious and persistent vendors, either, and eventually, The Contributor not only became recognized, it became accepted and even desired in the downtown area as property owners soon learned that where The Contributor Vendors stood, panhandlers disappeared. 

Folks who purchased The Contributor also quickly realized that the paper wasn't specifically written "by the homeless, for the homeless" but rather was meant to raise awareness about the issues causing homelessness while at the same time smashing the stereotypes about those who were actually experiencing homelessness. 

This is why you really can't subscribe to the paper unless you're a business, as we wanted to make sure folks who purchased the paper also had a moment to interact personally, face to face, with a vendor of the paper.  There is no better way for someone to realize "the homeless" are people just like you and me, and it pays to remember "but for the grace of God...."

Tasha French and Tom Wills are all that is left of the original founding members, but they''ve always been the backbone and the drive behind the mission, and they've dedicated their lives - at least at this point in them, anyway - to ensuring our original mission that any person experiencing homelessness on the streets of Nashville - or anywhere within distance that makes getting papers into one's hands a reality - has an opportunity to earn money legally, legitimately, and to do so without having to jump through the traditional employment hoops that keep so many folks on the street from working. 

If you haven't seen this trailer or don't know the story of The Contributor, check it out. It's a story about people helping people and overcoming every obstacle and challenge thrown at them in order to do so. 



Wikipedia currently describes The Contributor thusly:
Some of the more than 400 homeless and formerly homeless vendors of The Contributor.

Some of the more than 400 homeless and formerly homeless vendors of The Contributor.
The Contributor was established in 2007 by a core group of volunteers. The first issue was published in November of that year and had a circulation of about 800 copies. The paper publishes consistently on a monthly basis and has greatly expanded its circulation and vendor network to become the highest-circulating street newspaper of its kind in North America—circulating more than 100,000 papers per month.[3][4][5][6]
In 2010, The Contributor received 501(c)(3) status, becoming an independent non-profit organization. One of the founders of The Contributor received the Tennessee Titans Community Quarterback award for their volunteer efforts with the paper.[7] The award came with a $10,000 grant.
In July 2011, the newspaper sued Brentwood, Tennessee for banning the sale on its premises.[8]
The Contributor is one of many street newspapers in the United States, including Real Change in Seattle, Washington and Spare Change News in Boston, Massachusetts.


Info on the Street Paper Documentary and the trailer included below:
Street Paper takes the viewer inside the lives of Nashville's homeless population through street newspaper, The Contributor. This documentary offers a unique look into the lives of the founders, vendors and writers as the newspaper experiences exponential growth during September 2010. The Contributor is a member of The North American Street Newspaper Association (NASNA), which has 31 members. Addressing the issues of poverty and homelessness, a street newspaper is distributed by homeless and formerly homeless vendors. By sharing personal stories, street newspapers attach lives, faces and hearts to the idea of homelessness. These publications allow a bridge connecting the gap between the very poor and the rest of society by helping them understand the issues that concern homeless individuals. For many homeless people, this opportunity gives them a chance to get back on their feet and the real possibility of securing housing.

Category:

License:

Standard YouTube License


Smiling does a body good

Democracy Now Livestream