5.16.2012

Health Care for the Homeless Annual Conference in Kansas City, MO Kicks Off Today

This morning kicks off the 25th??? annual Healthcare for the Homeless conference in Kansas City, MO and the event is a first-class affair that folks attending this conference have come to expect from John Lozier and crew.  
This conference is one of two "must attend" events that folks in the world of homeless services try to make each year (the other being the fabulous National Alliance to End Homelessness conference) because not only are the networking opportunities damned near endless, the quality and selection of workshops and lecture sessions is both broad and comprehensive. 

That the conference is held this year in Kansas City plays especially well with me, given that rumblings from providers working in what the east and west coast folks sometimes sneeringly refer to as the "flyover" states indicate perceptions of increasingly isolated and out of touch policy formation that doesn't jibe with the realities of life and poverty that are affecting and negatively impacting both client and service agency.  

What is working in some of the bigger cities around the country on those coasts is either not working at all in the heartland, or is so challenging to implement that it might as well be asking providers to take people experiencing homelessness directly into their own homes as a way to end homelessness in their cities and towns.

Multiple reasons abound for this, including abject poverty within the provider community, ignorance about implementation and the systemic factors that contribute to homelessness, little or no training opportunities for direct service staff, siloed services with little or no agency collaboration and/or integration, frustration with community pushback that demoralizes the workforce, apathetic political involvement (if they're lucky enough to have political involvement), to name just a few.  And while these challenges are certainly not restricted to folks in the flyover states, the situation appears to be pervasive in them.  

Pockets of excellence appear, to be sure, but often the fight to reach excellence is so damned tough that it's hard to ask those examples to help lead others, although those individuals often jump at the chance.  And of course, what works in Gary, Indiana may not work at all in Odessa, MO., so it renders the collaboration moot and ineffective even if it could happen.

 We know homelessness is complex and as such, a cookie-cutter approach doesn't work so well.  But as we begin to dig down into the idea of scalability, we're beginning to see some patterns of successful program pieces emerge.  I think we're still a long way off from being able to promulgate generic approaches that bridge the challenges in a way that makes the chances of an agency's success in ending homelessness while treating mental illness and addiction higher, but that we're even looking for them as the precursor to an integrated approach is a giant step forward in the world of behavioral health.  

Conferences like the Healthcare for the Homeless, the National Alliance to End Homelessness, the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, and a host of other smaller but no less important events occurring each year bring us all together to talk about these challenges, barriers, and ways of overcoming them.  This is critically important because for the remainder of every year, we return to our communities and often  operate in isolation.   While efforts are being made in earnest to change this as well, the fact remains that for much of each year, many do operate almost in a vacuum.  

The cumulative trauma of providing services to those on the streets, coupled with the feeling of being alone and unsupported in the work we're doing, and constantly struggling for every penny in order to perform the most basic and rudimentary functions of the job wear heavily on the morale and chip away at one's initiative to do outstanding work.  Subsistence wages, community scorn, and the constant battle to find sustaining funding round out the globe of gloom for those working in this field, and it's hard to remain optimistic and hopeful for clients and colleagues when it's a constant battle for survival and enough gas to get to work each week. 

Add to this a perception that others seem to be enjoying substantial success, support and political will and you begin to understand the reasons for the rumblings of discontent within the flyover states. To those of you who continue the war against homelessness in these locales, know some of us hear you, loud and clear.  Take at least a little comfort in the fact that you have an increasingly louder voice that reminds those on the coasts and in the big cities that all is not well in the many places they've never heard of. 

To be continued....believe it.

5.01.2012

Housing Regulation Revamp Required Regardless of Resources & Remedies

I was Facebook-post chatting with my friend Diane Nilan, Founder and President of Hear Us, an advocacy and action/resources site for children and youths experiencing homelessness, after she'd posted a link to a story about families experiencing homelessness who were using storage sheds as an alternative to standard housing. 

As our  conversation progressed and a link to the petition supporting the proposed Homeless Children and Youth Act was posted (sign it here: Help Homeless Kids Now! | Tell Congress to Pass the Homeless Children and Youth Act) we began discussing the need to not only pressure HUD to increase its subsidies for housing vouchers, but also to begin exploring how best to remove the barriers from entering housing - especially public housing - that face folks after they've received HUD assistance.

This is an area of concern for every individual out there who has ever experienced any financial difficulties and/or an eviction in their life, as well as every single case manager and outreach specialist in the country, because a voucher is worthless if there are entry-restrictions in place that disqualify peeps before they ever get an opportunity to move in.  Additionally, if you're a program administrator who must provide data to HUD (and/or anyone else you may have grants or funding from), you know that the trend is towards getting people housed and keeping them there.  If you're operating a service funded by Federal grant funds and that discharges folks back onto the streets, chances are you've either seen your funding cut or the cut is coming soon because you're not reducing homelessness with your program.

Barriers to housing are in place both by HUD's regulations as well as state and local restrictions, which are often more stringent than HUD's and end up disqualifying large numbers of individuals for things that are often the result of spiraling into homelessness in the first place.  These barriers include (but are certainly not limited to):
  • Bad or non-existent credit
  • Outstanding utility bills (most public housing requires all utilities to be on and may cause an eviction if they lapse during the course of tenancy)
  • No income source
  • Criminal convictions
  • Prior evictions
  • Lack of references
  • Lack of recent rental history
  • Pet restrictions
  • Lack of complete identification documentation including a government issued ID, Social Security card, Birth Certificate, and recent TB test (for public housing)
These of course are some of the "official" reasons for refusal of a rental application.  You can rest assured that even though it's not supposed to, discrimination does occur around race, ethnicity, prior housing status (eg being "homeless"), general appearance, inappropriate social media posts (I know a landlord that ALWAYS looks up the applicant's name on Facebook and Twitter to get a more fuller profile of the individual) and word of mouth from other landlords and connections in the community.  Discrimination also happens as a result of fear around an applicant's perceived mental status, especially if the landlord believes the individual is "untreated" and/or has no local agency working in conjunction with them.  One landlord I heard talking stated that he "want's to be able to contact someone if Joe Doe lights his hair on fire at 3 in the morning.")

Diane and I began contemplating forming some type of national advocacy group that would work to promote "second chance" opportunities for folks who have these barriers, and are considering how best to initiate the effort.  At about the same time our discussion was occurring, I found a copy of the newly released Advocate's Guide to Housing and Community Development Policy, thanks to the National Low Income Housing Coalition. After reviewing the guide and then re-visiting their website, I threw some support behind the Coalition, since they're organized, powerful and recognized.  They're also well aware of the problems facing folks attempting to access housing, so this issue is definitely on their radar.

 I have learned over the years however that the more voices singing in unison, the louder the message is to those who hear it.  It may still be worthwhile to set up an advocacy group around the removal of barriers because this particular aspect often gets lost or diminished as we fight for funding crumbs to assist through vouchers and the building of affordable housing units.  I say again that it doesn't mean squat to have vouchers and units available if restrictions are so severe as to ban folks before they ever get near the door.

 I've set up a recurring donation to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, because not only do I fervently believe in their mission, priorities and agenda for 2012, I know Board member Mark Allison personally, having worked with him for the past year, and know him to be one of the most ardent advocates of the idea that housing is a basic human right.  If that man's voice is helping to steer policy at the board level, I know that the organization will always be committed to fair, affordable, accessible housing for everyone.

Check out the National Low Income Housing Coalition when you have a sec, and let them know you support their efforts with a donation.  The work they're doing is not just important, it's crucial to those who remain chained to the streets in homelessness and to those who struggle every single day just to have a roof over their heads.

Diane and I will be doing some additional talking around this issue, and I may reach out to Mark Allison to get his input as well, since I know of no one better to help us come to some decision on whether we're heading in the right direction.  The advocacy guide appears to have enough info in it to allow us to get off the ground, so if we decide to go forward, I think we're in good shape already to make some noise.

At the end of the day, the only thing we really have to remember and strive toward is this fact: housing ends homelessness.
Housing is a basic human right.
Everyone should be housed.
Period.

Smiling does a body good

Democracy Now Livestream