1.31.2008

Well, we're still looking for all the veterans sleeping under the bridges,...so if you find anybody, let us know."

Looks like Billy has grabbed the wrong tiger by the tail....

Homeless Vets Prepare To Block O'Reilly's Shot

January 31, 2008 01:59 AM


Wednesday afternoon, John Edwards suspended his candidacy for President, vowing to "never forget" the poverty-stricken Americans he so passionately stood up for, and beseeching the remaining candidates - indeed, all Americans - to continue the work that he termed "the cause of [his] life." This afternoon in New York City, some of that work will resolutely continue, as a group of homeless veterans - one of the segments of the population of forgotten Americans that Edwards spoke of so often on the stump - will swarm FOX News Channel's Studios to bring their fight to Bill O'Reilly, the millionaire celebrity host of The O'Reilly Factor.

O'Reilly, who regularly defamed Edwards as a phony, has a lot to answer for. In attacks on the former North Carolina Senator, O'Reilly has repeatedly belittled his compassion, issued inflammatory statements and mocking attacks, and denied both the "existence and significance" of homeless veterans. As recently as January 16, O'Reilly took to the airwaves to rain ridicule upon Edwards, saying, "Well, we're still looking for all the veterans sleeping under the bridges,...so if you find anybody, let us know." As we reported two days later, Robert Greenwald and his crew at Brave New Films did exactly that.

Now, a group from Fitzgerald House, an "organization representing homeless veterans," plans to bring their fight for recognition to Fox's doorstep. They plan on visiting the Fox News Channel Studios today at 3:00 pm, and will come carrying a petition signed by 17,000 people demanding an apology from O'Reilly for his ignorance and abuse. In a press release, Brave New Films and Fitzgerald House say thay "have found that it is very easy to locate homeless veterans and are willing to help O'Reilly find them if his desire to help homeless vets is sincere."

Of course, the last time we checked in on O'Reilly, he was in New Hampshire, bullying Obama aides, and snarling about how "nobody blocks a [camera] shot" on the "Factor." Well, we'll see about that.

Why People Are Homeless

I was perusing the Rescue Mission's homepage trying to find additional info on their Host program this morning when I came across this page with information from the National Coalition of the Homeless. They've been posted on the net many times previously but they are so important that they bear periodic repeating. Many of these things are touched on every day here in this blog, but it's always nice to see them presented so succinctly....

The Reasons People are Homeless in Nashville The Nashville Coalition for the Homeless cites these major reasons for homelessness in Middle Tennessee:

The lack of affordable housing has been identified as the major factor contributing to homelessness in every major study of the issue conducted since 1986. Physical Disability: Profound injuries, illness or birth defects. Socially debilitating physical traits such as disfigurement, dental deficiencies, or obesity. Developmental Difficulties: Low IQ or traumatic head injury that hinders intellectual functioning. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: A history of domestic violence, abuse, combat, catastrophic loss of family, among other causes. Educational Deficiencies: The inability to read and write, lack of basic education skills or no high school diploma. Learning Disabilities: Dyslexia, ADD and other disorders, which interfere with educational, and life functioning. Addictions: Drugs, alcohol, sex, gambling and other addictions. Severe Family Dysfunction: Abusive parents, broken homes, multiple residences/caregivers. No Family or Significant Support System: Total lack of family support due to death, alienation, or institutionalized childhood Criminal History: The existence of a criminal record that seriously limits opportunity. Limited Occupational Skill Set: The inability to do anything beyond the most basic manual labor. Life Skill Deficiency: The inability to manage the most basic life functions such as hygiene, housing, transportation, finances and relationships. Transportation Deficiencies: The inability to purchase, maintain, insure or legally drive a car or obtain transportation through public or private means. Prior Long Term Institutionalization: An extended stay in juvenile institutions, mental hospitals, prison or other institution. Generational Poverty: Two or more generations dependent on public assistance or charity for basic living needs that has fostered an attitude of helplessness.

Tennessee and Metro's 10-Year Plans
to Eliminate Chronic Homelessness:

Metro Nashville Mayor Bill Purcell recently appointed a Mayor's Taskforce to End Chronic Homelessness in 2004. The eleven-member taskforce includes representatives from city social service agencies, nonprofit agencies that serve homeless people, and formerly homeless people. The city's target is to eliminate chronic homelessness by 2015.

Nashville joins 170 other U.S. cities in the nationwide campaign. Mayor Purcell's plan calls for spending $74,000,000 to provide supportive housing from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Member organizations of the Nashville Coalition for the Homeless and the city government are coordinating services provided to the estimated 9,000 homeless people estimated annually in Nashville.

The city government has estimated that a comprehensive plan to eliminate chronic homelessness may cost $10,000 for a single homeless person. Based upon the 2004 homeless count tally, the price tag for homeless services could total $20 million annually. The city's plan involves increasing housing options, expanding health care services and implementing job training. Better coordination of existing programs offered by Metro and nonprofit service providers is also proposed.

The Nashville Rescue Mission is spending $7.3 million this year to help an estimated 6,500 men, women and children. Services at the Mission include overnight shelter and three meals daily, work therapy, life-recovery and education programs, and Christian education and daily worship. The Mission does not take government funding.

The state of Tennessee is also cooperating with a federal campaign to eliminate chronic homelessness. Governor Phil Bredesen signed an executive order in December 2004 that created the Governor's Interagency Council on Homelessness. President George W. Bush initiated the national strategy, which is coordinated by the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness.

Homelessness in Tennessee is estimated at 10,000 men, women and children on any given night. During the next 10 years, the state plans to improve the coordination of and access to housing, health, education and human service programs in cities and rural areas.

"...the count traditionally produces an informed but not precise tally of an area's homeless population, Colmie said. "

Boy, you'd think that the folks over at the Tennessean would at least spell the name of the woman in charge of the count correctly. Sigh. For the record, it's Suzie Tolmie.... We love ya, Suz! Thanks for the awesome coordination and a huge "thank you" to Maryanne at MDHA for the packets and directions that night. We couldn't have done it without you!!!

Annual homeless count taking place

By JANELL ROSS • Staff Writer • January 30, 2008

The Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency will release the results of its annual homeless tally sometime next week. During the early morning hours Tuesday, about 100 volunteers from about 15 different agencies combed the city's known areas that attract homeless people and made contact with those living under Davidson County's overpasses and bridges and on its streets, said Suzie Colmie, MDHA's homeless coordinator. For the rest of the week, MDHA will gather information about what are known as "sub-populations," such as homeless veterans and drug addicted, disabled or mentally ill individuals living in area shelters and transitional housing.

Last year, the Davidson County count produced a tally of 2,176. The count is used by MDHA and other agencies to solicit federal, state, local and private dollars for housing and other anti-homelessness programs. Right now, about 20 Nashville-area programs are operating with the help of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development homelessness project funds, Colmie said.

Each year, HUD recommends that communities attempt to count homeless men, women and children living in shelters, temporary housing and outdoors during the last week of January, said Colmie. The agency prefers that the count take place in the early morning hours about the same time each year in cities around the country to limit duplication. Despite efforts, the count traditionally produces an informed but not precise tally of an area's homeless population, Colmie said. In December, HUD announced more than $3.3 million in grant funds to MDHA. MDHA will, in turn, award funds to local programs. The funds will support approximately 460 units of housing and make services available to more than 1,000 homeless individuals, MDHA said in a statement. Agencies receiving funding include the Campus for Human Development, Matthew 25, the Oasis Center, Operation Stand Down, the Park Center, Renewal House and the Salvation Army. Contact Janell Ross 726-5982 at jross1@Tennessean.com

"Nashville’s bill is clearly too broad"

Many thanks to Jeff Woods for stating what I - and so many others -have been saying all along -the ordinance is overly broad and will almost certainly fail a constitutional challenge, so long as a competent attorney argues it. Whether the bill eventually becomes amended to rid itself of that "after dark" ban - something I believe at least two Council members would support, since I have spoken directly to them about it - remains to be seen (although I am still smarting from my previous gaffe with my statement about the after dark ban being removed prior to the third reading - its what I get for trusting but not verifying...). But expecting Dean to alienate a large bloc of potential supporters and future funders almost immediately upon taking public office by immediately vetoing a bill that received unanimous council support - Maynard's denial nothwithstanding - would be "politically unfeasible at this time," not to mention creating the potential for some tough negotiations for the remainder of his term. No one wants everyone ticked at them the first days on the job.... Something else Woods touched on that I've been saying among those I work with since I arrived in Nashville bears exploration; Karl Dean has repeatedly stated he's a proponent of local area businesses and he is intent upon improving public safety in Nashville. There's nothing wrong with any of these things - Nashville can use help in all the areas mentioned, you understand - but in fact, if one pays attention to his message, one realizes quite clearly where Dean will throw most of his weight and therefore can work, plan and act accordingly. Dean has to walk a fine line here and he's also had an inside view into the types of crime most prevalent in Nashville, since he served three terms as the Public Defender and operated on the "Commission of Twelve" crime prevention taskforce. He's well aware of the Constitutional problems with this bill, and he's also extremely familiar with the laws on the books that would work in place of this ordinance. While you would think he would immediately recognize a bad bill when he sees one, there may be other things he's working on that preclude him from acting on this one. Politics makes for some strange bedfellows and who knows what kinds of things are being discussed behind those doors. I happen to know that there are some rather large plans for Homeless assistance in the works currently and they include just about every facet of the city's population, although that's about all I can say at the present time. Rest assured however, when I'm allowed to speak, I will. He's also aware of who got him where he's at and the need to balance harmonies among a diverse constituency. At the end of the day however, those on the lower rungs of the ladder simply cannot muster the kind of support he'll need to move beyond Nashville, should the urge strike him at some point. I don't know the man's ultimate political ambitions, but I know enough about politics to know you don't bite the hand that feeds ya. This doesn't mean that Dean is an uncaring politician focused only on his personal rise to power, but it would be naive not to believe that there are hundreds of influences on the man, and personal advancement is one of them. Who knows, the upcoming "Stakeholder's meeting" may bring some good news to the area's Homeless. They could sure use some, let me tell you.....
Outlawing Poverty
Dean going along with crackdown on panhandling
You could call it Mayor Karl Dean’s English-Only Moment when, like his predecessor, he could prove his progressive credentials by bucking popular sentiment and vetoing a pointless and mean-spirited bill. Bill Purcell did it by killing last year’s much-ridiculed measure to make English the official language of Nashville. Dean could do it by vetoing a Metro Council bill aimed at cracking down on begging in our city.

But even though the Metro Law Department has determined the anti-panhandling bill may violate free speech rights and should be neutered, sources say Dean is preparing to let the proposal become law without his signature next week. The mayor could veto the bill and tell the council to pass one that’s acceptable to him—or not at all. But instead he’s ready to trust the bill’s sponsors to amend the ordinance after it becomes law to meet his objections.

“It’s about working together, meeting and making a decision together,” Dean press secretary Janel Lacy says. She adds that any final decision depends on a meeting this week between the bill’s sponsors and the mayor’s office. But Metro Law Director Sue Cain predicts, “I think this will go into effect without the mayor’s signature. It’ll become law and then we will help them draft an amendment. I believe in people’s good intentions and their good faith, and I think they will go ahead and pass” the amendment proposed by Dean.

To be fair to Dean, he’s in his first few months as mayor and needs to maintain cordial relations with the council, whereas Purcell was in his last year in office and feeling unusually brave because he wasn’t running for reelection.

Dean may keep the council happy, but if he lets the bill become law, then the council might decide later not to change it, in which case the city could wind up paying a small fortune defending the ordinance in court. And Dean would have failed the first test of whether he’s willing to spend a little political capital from time to time to save the city from the periodic stupidities and outrages of the council, which voters were counting on him to do.

To meet constitutional muster, according to Cain, the bill basically needs whittling from one that targets begging generally—there could be no solicitations of money period after dark, for instance—to one that bans only so-called aggressive panhandling. That’s defined as “approaching or speaking to another person in such a manner that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety, to persist in panhandling after a person has given a negative response, to block passage of a person being solicited for funds, to touch a solicited person, to render service to a motor vehicle without prior consent of the owner, or to engage in any other activity that would reasonably be construed as intended to intimidate or compel a person to give money.”

But all of that is already in violation of laws against assault, harassment and any number of other criminal statutes. Which means that what Dean wants is an ordinance that’s completely unnecessary. Which also means it might not satisfy the council’s appetite to punish beggars. The bill was recorded as passing unanimously by voice vote, although at least one council member, the at-large representative Jerry Maynard, says he voted no.

Nashville is not alone in passing ordinances against panhandling. By one count, 47 of the 50 biggest U.S. cities have something on the books. All these cities have come to the conclusion that begging is bad for business. Downtown businesses, backed by the city’s growing population of urban residents, are demanding Nashville’s crackdown. Police could give $50 tickets to beggars.

“This gives business owners a tool to get these people off their doorsteps when they’re harassing their customers,” says Ben Bahil, vice president of the Urban Residents Association.

But courts around the country have held that begging is speech protected by the First Amendment, and any ordinance must be narrowly tailored so as not to interfere with those rights. Nashville’s bill is clearly too broad. No one could ask for help after dark anywhere in the city. The proposal, sponsored by council member Walter Hunt, was patterned after an Indianapolis ordinance that was upheld by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But that case is not a true test, Metro’s legal analysts say, because the plaintiffs failed to make a key argument that could have led to a different ruling.

Advocates for the poor say that, regardless of whether the ordinance is constitutional, it tarnishes whatever reputation for kindness the city might have earned. “It’s unfair, and it’s sad,” says Charles Strobel, founder of the Room in the Inn shelter for the homeless. “We want to be known as a compassionate city, and I want to believe we are. But public policy indicates public attitude, and if we’ve got an aggressive attitude toward a particular population, then I don’t know if we can claim compassion.”

"Murfreesboro John" Enters the Nasville Rescue Mission Host Program!

530am: I just got off the phone with "John," the man I talked about some time ago who was living in a dumpster over on Murfreesboro rd for the past four years. He called me from the Nashville Rescue Mission's Host Program! He's now off the street, sober, going through a 90 day rehab and working on restoring his life to something better than living in a trash can. I'd like to thank John's new case manager Ashley for busting her ass with me to help John and I'd like to thank the Mission's Host program's staff for making something like this available for peeps like my boy John. The Mission takes a lot of heat for some of their problems and there is no doubt that they have some problems. But I sure hope folks realize the incredible difference the Mission makes in the lives of so many who are at the end of their rope and don't know where to turn next.

1.29.2008

"...Seattle's draft protocol for removing homeless encampments is unreasonable and inhumane and would violate federal and state law..."

And speaking of rights for the Homeless...

Last updated January 28, 2008 9:36 p.m. PT

City of Seattle's plan for clearing homeless encampments called inhumane

48-hour notice may not suffice, critics warn

By JOHN IWASAKI P-I REPORTER

The city of Seattle's draft protocol for removing homeless encampments is unreasonable and inhumane and would violate federal and state law, critics said Monday.

It also would not solve the underlying issues of homelessness and lack of long-term, low-income housing in Seattle, homeless advocates said in rejecting the city's self-described "consistent and compassionate approach" to the situation.

"We're all human beings," said John Bailey, a homeless man who says he suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder. "We deserve what we are here for: a roof over every head and a bed under every body."

The city's Human Services Department drafted the protocol following criticism starting last summer of unannounced sweeps of encampments, which are considered public safety and health problems because of drinking, drug use, garbage, rats, fires and lack of toilets.

The proposal says the city generally would give at least 48 hours notice before clearing a camp and would try to connect homeless people with services and shelters, though it could deny notice and referrals if it suspects "illegal activities" or a public health hazard.

The city would store certain personal items, such as prescription drugs or identification cards, for retrieval for up to 60 days.

The protocol would cover all city property and departments. The city would respond to complaints or upon finding an encampment, and could deputize noncity employees to carry out the rules.

Advocates for the homeless were not impressed at a public hearing Monday.

David Bloom, co-chairman of the Interfaith Coalition on Homelessness, said the protocol shows " a greater concern for the letter of the law than the realities of the street."

Bloom cited an annual count of homeless in Seattle and other parts of King County taken early Friday in which 2,631 people were found sleeping in cars, doorways, parks and beneath roadways. About 6,000 more were counted in shelters or in transitional housing.

Dan Wise, director of the Aloha Inn low-income apartments and a member of the steering committee for the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness, said the city's protocol "doesn't go far enough for a pathway out of homelessness. That's where Seattle needs to be."

The protocol violates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure, the Fifth Amendment's ban on taking private property for public use (in this case, the use of the land upon which a camp sits) without just compensation, and the 14th Amendment's due process requirement, said Casey Trupin, a lawyer representing the homelessness coalition.

In a letter sent Monday to the city, Trupin said the coalition finds it "counterproductive to cite individuals who are indigent for life-sustaining behavior, such as sleeping in public places or construction of temporary shelters, when there is a lack of long-term affordable housing."

The coalition also criticized a provision that would allow the city to dispose of abandoned property that is "reasonably valued at less than $25." That's an arbitrary amount because "all the belongings of people experiencing homelessness are valuable," Trupin said, "even those without set monetary value."

Instead of a 48-hour minimum notice, the coalition called for advance notice of 28 days, saying that more time is needed when "engaging an individual whose housing options are limited, who has a mental illness, or who may have had bad experiences with police or shelter(s) or other providers."

Most of the citizens who submitted written comments to the city before Monday's hearing found fault with the proposal.

Lisa Dekker said that "for the most part, this is a case of removing the symptom, not curing the problem."

The city's explanation "puts an emphasis on a compassion that does not exist in the proposed administrative rule," Linda Julien said.

But Matthew Hardesty attributed trash and safety problems to the homeless at Jose Rizal Park at the north end of Beacon Hill and "the Jungle," an adjacent greenbelt. "It would be great if the city could find an opportunity to clear those people out," he said.

City Councilman Tim Burgess said city staffers were "definitely headed in the right direction."

GET INVOLVED

"Beyond the One Night Count," a briefing and advocacy training session, will be offered from 1 to 3 p.m. Saturday at Keystone Church, 5019 Keystone Place N., Seattle.

The event is presented by the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness and Faithful Action in Transforming Homelessness, a program of the Archdiocesan Housing Authority. To register online, go to homelessinfo.org.

SPEAK OUT

You can comment on the city's draft protocol for removing homeless encampments until 5 p.m. Thursday. Comments can be made to David Takami, public information officer with the city's Human Services Department in four ways:

  • E-mail by sending comments to Takami at david.takami@seattle.gov.
  • Mail to David Takami, public information officer, Seattle Human Services Department, P.O. Box 34215, Seattle, WA, 98124-4215.
  • Hand-deliver by dropping your comments off at the 58th floor at 700 Fifth Ave. (Fifth Avenue and Columbia Street).
  • Fax by sending comments to Takami at 206-233-5119.
  • P-I reporter John Iwasaki can be reached at 206-448-8096 or johniwasaki@seattlepi.com.

    "...being homeless is about far more than lacking a roof over one's head; it is a profound form of social exclusion."

    Please excuse what may turn out to be a rambling, disjointed response; I was out long past the 2am cutoff for the Homeless count that occurred in Davidson County last night and I am about burnt to a crisp this morning. Unfortunately, I've long since lost the ability to "sleep in." Methadone pseudo-withdrawals begin shortly after I pass my usual dosing time (5am), even though they aren't supposed to, and adding insult to injury, my internal clock demands I awaken in the AM because I have "responsibilities" to myself and others. So, I never sleep in past seven and am usually up by 5am, whether I want to be or not. But once again, I digress, although this time you can't say I didn't warn you. The count went about as well for me as it could have and I was able to boost last year's count number considerably just for the camps alone - one of the benefits of knowing folks in them and tromping through the underbrush to get to them. I also roamed the Donelson/Hermitage area and found approximately 22 people in that area, so overall I think my humble team performed incredibly well. Much thanks to Ashley and Judith for their dedication and commitment, as well as their company. Judith and I talked briefly about the Nashville City Paper's decision to run the info on the count prior to the count occurring, a traditional "no-no" in the world of Homeless counting. Judith is a well-respected journalist here in Nashville and an unbelievably perceptive and compassionate individual. To say she was shocked to see that the paper had run the info pre-count is an understatement. However, I explained to her that one of the problems with the count is the failure to include the Homeless in the procedural aspects of it. They are not children (families are obviously excluded here) and they are definitely not stupid. While they recognize that there is some risk in exposing their sleeping spots to local officials, the vast majority are smart enough to understand the negative economic impact upon them as a result of low count numbers, so long as someone takes the time to explain it to them. I think a large part of the reason I was able to count as many folks as I did last night was because I not only let them know I was coming, but also that I explained in detail to them why it is that having accurate count numbers is so important. People listen to me because not only have I been where they are now at, they know I also have the resources they need and I'm pretty liberal in passing out those resources. They also know that my resources are severely limited. It ain't rocket science to understand that if I can show there are more people than resources, I might be able to get an increase in those resources, which just might mean a "trickle-down" increase in resources to them. Whaddya know, finally a valid reason for Reaganomics.... There will undoubtedly be many who will disagree with me here and that's okay. I think that there is a valid concern in informing people of the count prior to its occurrence when there are not enough folks available to provide the informational awareness effort to go along with it. And if you're not going to include the Homeless in the process, then I guess you're going to have to go about it sneakily. But be forewarned with this approach; it magnifies and enhances the perception among the Homeless that we "mainstreamers" are not to be trusted. It also scares the shit out of them as they have no idea whatsoever why we're intruding into their "homes" and demanding to know how many are there. When it's viewed in this context, who can blame them for not wanting to be counted? Fits well with the idea of rights of the homeless, and it looks like Australia is about to shoot right on past the U.S. in the progressive treatment of those inhabiting their streets....

    Rights of the homeless

    Philip Lynch January 30, 2008

    Humanity should direct the investigation launched by the Prime Minister into the plight of the homeless.

    'EVEN though I am homeless, I am still a useful member of society and not some no-hoper; I have many skills to offer." This appeal to government comes from Barbara, a homeless woman living in Melbourne.

    Two years ago, I consulted more than 100 homeless or formerly homeless people across Melbourne about the legislative and policy changes needed to make Victoria a more inclusive and rights-respecting community for this disadvantaged group.

    Having worked with the homeless for the previous five years, I was familiar with the statistics. Every night, almost 100,000 people experience homelessness across Australia. Only one in seven of these people find a bed in crisis accommodation. More than 350 people a day are turned away from homelessness services across Australia because of a lack of capacity and resources, with women and children the most likely to be rejected. Homeless people experiencing mental disorders are also especially susceptible to lack of access or exclusion.

    But what emerged from the consultations was a more complex understanding of the fact that being homeless is about far more than lacking a roof over one's head; it is a profound form of social exclusion.

    Tracey, a single homeless mother, told us about the fear and stigmatisation she experienced sleeping in a park for more than a week with her three young children, all aged under 10. Leo, a homeless man, told us, "The lower your socio-economic position, the less rights you have."

    What also emerged was a deeper understanding of the multidimensional nature of homelessness. There are critical correlations between lack of access to adequate housing, poor health, low educational attainment, unemployment and social exclusion. The homeless people we consulted knew this through experience and intuition.

    When asked to identify the fundamental human rights that they considered should inform and be prioritised in public policy-making, they nominated the right to adequate health care, the right to decent work, the right to education and the right to adequate housing. Above all, however, they nominated the right to participation and to be treated with dignity and respect.

    As James, a 29-year-old homeless man, said: "There is nothing worse than not being able to understand or control what is happening to you. We should have the main say, because it's for us, and we know what's really going on."

    On Sunday, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd announced the establishment of a committee to prepare a white paper on homelessness. He said, "we have a situation where as the country gets wealthier, homelessness gets worse — something needs to be done". The committee, which will report in August, has been asked to investigate the causes of homelessness and develop a total policy response. The Prime Minister's announcement comes just months after the appointment of Julia Gillard as Australia's first Minister for Social Inclusion, and the pre-election and post-election commitments to national consultation about a federal charter of rights.

    This signals an important new chapter in public and social policy in Australia in which human rights — those core minimum standards that are necessary for people to live with dignity in an inclusive and participatory community — are writ large.

    There is a strong relationship between denial of human rights, poverty and social exclusion. As the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has written: "Lack of rights and freedoms is both a cause and a consequence of poverty. Socially and politically excluded people are more likely to become poor, and the poor are more vulnerable to social exclusion and political marginalisation." There is also a correlation between respect for human rights and a government's success in dealing with homelessness and poverty, as is clear from the work of Nobel prize winning economist Amartya Sen.

    What would a human rights response to homelessness look like? First, such a response would directly and meaningfully involve the participation of homeless people themselves in developing solutions to homelessness. Internationally, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has recognised that a policy or program formulated without the active and informed participation of those affected "is most unlikely to be effective".

    Second, a human rights response would involve all levels of government committing to, and taking concrete and targeted legislative and budgetary steps towards, the full and expeditious realisation of the right to adequate housing and connected human rights, including the rights to health, social security, non-discrimination, education, participation, human dignity and respect.

    It would involve the development of benchmarks and performance measures. Such steps are not only required by our obligations towards human rights and common decency, but also by principles of sound economic management.

    In Britain, a body of evidence demonstrates that the provision of adequate, supported accommodation can contribute to the reduction of criminal offending by more than 20%, saving costs in law enforcement and adjudication. Similarly, recent studies in the United States and Canada demonstrate that long-term solutions to homelessness reduce the use of other government services and substantially reduce the total cost to government.

    Rudd said on Sunday that he does not want to live in a country where "we accept people begging on the streets" or "sleeping rough every night". He commendably committed his government to "make a difference".

    Homeless people in Victoria have said respect for and the entrenchment of human rights would be a good place to start.

    Philip Lynch is director of the Human Rights Law Resource Centre and was the founding co-ordinator of Australia's first Homeless Persons' Legal Clinic.

    This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/01/29/1201369130956.html

    1.28.2008

    "The homeless population is aging, like the general population."

    And it is going to become increasingly expensive to care for these folks, since they will place an even heavier burden on services as they become less capable of caring for themselves while on the streets....

    Dallas-area shelters struggle to serve aging homeless population

    Agencies start special programs to offer care, housing to the aging
    11:01 PM CST on Sunday, January 27, 2008
    By KIM HORNER / The Dallas Morning News khorner@dallasnews.com

    A growing number of people showing up at North Texas shelters don't look anything like the stereotype of a homeless person.

    JIM MAHONEY/DMN
    At the Dallas Life Foundation, (from left) Brenda Beasley, 50, Abou Jalloh, 59, and William Furlong, 53, play bingo. A third of Dallas County's homeless are at least 50 years old. The foundation offers older residents their own lounge, separate dorms and group activities.

    They are gray-haired grandmothers and grandfathers who use wheelchairs, walkers and canes. Some are dropped off by their children. Some die in shelters or on the streets as the days turn into years.

    The homeless population is aging, like the general population. And shelters report seeing larger numbers of older residents – in their 50s and up – who have nowhere else to go.

    Marilyn Horton, 55, said she lived under a bridge before recently moving into the Dallas Life Foundation, which has a special program for older residents.

    "I'm trying to save my life and pull my family back together," Ms. Horton, a recovering addict, said during a weekly bingo game at the shelter.

    People age 50 and above make up a third of Dallas County's homeless population, which is 5,163, according to a 2007 count by the Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance. That is up from 25 percent in 2004.

    The aging homeless population poses challenges for shelters, which struggle to find housing for seniors earning as little as $600 a month in federal benefits. Many shelters also are not equipped to care for older residents with cancer, heart trouble and Alzheimer's disease.

    Homeless people tend to age faster than the general population and have significantly shorter life spans because of the lack of routine medical care, hard living conditions, poor nutrition and lack of routine sleep, said Cindy Honey, executive director of the Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance.

    "Someone who's 50 on the street is more like in their 60s or 70s," Ms. Honey said. "It's a hard life, and it hits you physically."

    Some shelters, such as the Dallas Life Foundation, have adapted with special programs. The 24 seniors currently living at the shelter – who pay $10 a night if they have an income – have their own lounge, men's and women's dorms separate from the rest of the shelter population, regular group activities and first place in the line for meals.

    "They're sweet, sweet people, and I don't know what situations brought them here," said Lisa Hicks, the shelter's volunteer coordinator. "We try to keep them here and keep them safe."

    The rising number of older homeless people in Dallas-Fort Worth follows a national trend.

    "Like the general population, which is aging and getting grayer, there seems to be more homeless people living out their final days on the streets or in a shelter," said Michael Stoops, acting executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless in Washington, D.C. There are few shelters specifically for seniors nationwide, and little research has been done on the problem, he added.

    Shelter officials say the toughest challenge is finding housing for their older residents, who tend to stay for years as a result. The Dallas Life Foundation had one man who lived at the shelter 18 years until he got an apartment two years ago.

    The residents who have an income cannot afford an apartment along with other necessities. The wait for federally subsidized housing can be several years.

    "It's getting harder for them to find places to live because of the limited income they can make," said the Rev. Bubba Dailey, executive director of the Austin Street Centre shelter in Dallas. "There's not enough low-income housing where they can afford medication, clothing, food and everything they need and still maintain an apartment.

    "They're just at the mercy of places like this," Ms. Dailey said.

    Abou Jalloh, a 59-year-old Dallas Life Foundation resident, said he wants to get his own apartment. But first, the former warehouse worker is applying for disability benefits because of a bad back. Until then, Mr. Jalloh plans to stay at the shelter, where he watched Jeopardy! in the TV lounge on a recent cold day.

    Mr. Jalloh said the days can be boring, but he's grateful for the shelter. "So far, it's been good," he said.

    The Dallas Life Foundation and the Austin Street Centre are among 21 nonprofits that receive funding through The Dallas Morning News Charities.

    Since 1986, The Charities program has raised more than $17.25 million for area nonprofit agencies that serve the homeless and hungry. The 2007-08 fundraising campaign runs through Thursday, though donations are accepted anytime. The News pays all administrative costs, so 100 percent of donations goes to the agencies.

    "....homeless advocates and volunteers take to the streets to count homeless people."

    I'm part of Nashville's annual effort to count their homeless population this month. The count occurs tonight (1-28) from 11pm until around 2am and includes every area of Davidson county. Some 21 teams with a total of around 80 volunteers are joining together at the Nashville Rescue Mission at 10pm and will head out in teams into the "underbelly" of the city to try and find those who are sleeping on her streets, alleys, dumpsters and other "suitable" spots. I've been out doing an "informational awareness" effort over the last week, spending 10-12 hours daily both visiting and verifying sites that I'll be counting in the wee hours of the night. I'll be doing all the camps in the area; I suspect they did this because so many folks will probably recognize me. I'm almost sure to know at least one or two peeps from each site. It's a huge undertaking and I'm not sure I can get them all done in the time alloted, but I'll get to most of them, even if it takes me all night. I've been greasing the skids so to speak, by visiting ahead of time as many as I can and letting folks know I'll be coming through on Monday night. I've also been trying to help alleviate some fears that surround the count and the perception that the police follow us around, busting sites after we count them. That is not true, at least for the previous couple of years here in Nashville. What occurred prior to that was, at least in the mind of most folks minds who are "in the know" about this, an unfortunate timing debacle where a camp was dismantled prior to the count but word on the street was that it actually happened after - and as a result of - the count. Old fears die hard... It should be noted that many of the larger campsites we have are given to us by the police and park service, so if they wanted them gone, they'd have already been in to do the nasty on em. Anyway, there is no doubt whatsoever that we're missing huge numbers of folks during the count, but it's the best we can muster with the forces we have. Part of the problem is that the count occurs nationwide in January. While choosing this particular day in this particular month may force many into shelters which are included in the count, it makes it difficult for folks to find those who are sleeping outside as they are often bundled and hidden very well. Also, people often try to "gang up" in motel rooms and bum couch space from friends and/or family with houses during these cold nights, further decreasing the actual number of people on the streets. Doesn't mean these folks aren't homeless, they just don't get counted because we can't locate them. Another part of the problem is the time in which the count is set; 11pm to 2am. The timing is done this way to prevent duplication of those who might still be moving about during the daylight hours. By counting late in the evening, officials feel confident that people are where they will be for the entire night, thereby eliminating any double-counting of individuals. In previous years, the count was staged even later in the evening, but there is little reason to tromp through alleys, camps and streets when many folks are bedded down long before 2am. But it's still dark, which makes seeing folks next to impossible, and if you don't know where to look, you might step right over folks without ever knowing they are there. Add to this mix the fact that many of the volunteers rarely step foot into the city for the purpose of locating homeless folks sleeping and you are sure to miss folks simply because of the difficulty in seeing, knowing what to look for and the lack of specific knowledge about where to search. Finally, many tramps have hiding spots so well disguised and hidden that we wouldn't be able to find them even during the day, let alone wandering about in the darkness. And this doesn't include folks who are sleeping in abandoned houses and buildings, or in the backs of unlocked semi trailers, etc., etc., etc., as we don't usually go into these places because of the potential for danger. (about 7 minutes into this video, you'll see a site that I seriously doubt anyone would find if they didn't know it was there already....) So the numbers will definitely come in on the low side. Given the amount of people I serve and know that are homeless here in Nashville, I'd venture to say that for every one person counted, we miss at least five others, and I'm including all the numbers we pull from places like the Mission and transitional housing units. So, if we count 2,000 tonight, in reality that number is more likely to be 10,000 folks who actually are homeless. Remember here that we're talking about all of Davidson County; there are folks who never set foot in the downtown area, preferring instead to hang in the outlying areas where hearts haven't yet been hardened by some of the more obnoxious folks who sometimes wander the streets homeless. Last year no homeless were found over in the Doneleson area; this year I know of at least 10 people who hang by I 40 and Donelson alone. There are at least 5 people who live out on the shores of Percy Priest Lake that I'm aware of, and I often see tramps walking up and down Stewart's Ferry or flying signs at the Stewart Ferry and Hermitage exits. Just because we didn't count them last year doesn't mean they are not here......

    Davidson homeless count starts tonight

    BY AMANDA N. MAYNORD amaynord@nashvillecitypaper.com

    A hot-button issue in Nashville, the topic of homelessness will again be front and center tonight as homeless advocates and volunteers take to the streets to count homeless people. With the Metro Development and Housing Agency leading the charge, many nonprofit organizations and volunteers, almost 100, will canvas the city counting homeless people and urging them to take advantage of resources in the area. Anyone counted will receive a voucher that’s redeemable at one of two nonprofit assistance agencies, as well as personal items, according to one volunteer. “[The count] will provide sort of a joining of forces amongst all [Metro] Council members and all segments of Nashvillians to… join together and recognize that homelessness isn’t just a downtown problem… but it’s a problem that affects the entire county,” said Steve Samra, homeless coordinator for Park Center, a local nonprofit. Samra said the larger the count, the more power agencies will have to request money for everything from additional social services to housing resources. Volunteers will hit the streets around 11 p.m. and hopefully conclude around 2 a.m. tomorrow morning. The group should have a solid number by next Monday. The teams will not only tally the total number of homeless in the county, but will also show totals by council district so Metro Council members will have a general idea of the homeless population in their area. Douglas Perkins, director of Vanderbilt University’s Center for Community Studies, is counting on data from the homeless census to complete a study he and his students have been working on for the Metro Homelessness Commission. Perkins said he has been working on the study for the past year trying to determine the hidden costs of homelessness and will present the results to the Homelessness Commission as soon as estimates can be calculated using the homeless census data. Representatives from the Metro Development and Housing Agency did not return phone calls last week. CP

    1.27.2008

    "...the disproportionate share of affected individuals serves as an example of how the politics of criminal justice is always local."

    We all know that crack busts unfairly sent large numbers of African Americans to prison for long periods of time while their white brothers and sisters busted with powder cocaine of the same weight often walked away with a minor slap on the wrist. While America has one helluva long way to go before the scales of justice are truly colorblind and level, eliminating a racist double-standard like this is at least a small step in the right direction.

    Releasing Crack Convicts Early

    The first batch of convicted crack

    cocaine dealers will getting out this

    year, and Virginia will feel the brunt.

    Posted January 25, 2008

    The first batch of convicted crack cocaine dealers will getting out this year, and Virginia will feel the brunt.

    In the coming months the first trickle of convicted crack cocaine dealers is expected to head home from prison months, if not years, earlier than expected—a result of recent changes in the sentencing guidelines that will retroactively lower the punishment for most defendants convicted of peddling the addictive drug.

    The move is a historic shift from a controversial policy that for 20 years has punished crack dealers far more harshly than those selling the drug's powder form. But no place in the country will feel the impact of the changes more than the Eastern District of Virginia, which has 7 percent—1,404 cases—of the nation's 19,500 individuals impacted by the new guidelines. That is nearly double the amount in the next highest areas, the middle district of Florida and the district of South Carolina.

    How this stretch of Virginia, which runs from the border of Washington, D.C., through Richmond and Norfolk, came to host more most federal crack cocaine cases than any other district has little to do with the prevalence of drug trafficking. Rather, the disproportionate share of affected individuals serves as an example of how the politics of criminal justice is always local.

    Virginia has always been a law-and-order state. But the high level of prosecutions goes back to the crack epidemic in the late 1980s and early 1990s when the state capital, Richmond, became one of the nation's murder capitals as well. "Everyone agreed that something had to be done," says Andrew McBride, a former federal prosecutor in the Eastern District.

    Frustrated that local prosecutors treated crack cases as only misdemeanors, the U.S. Attorney's office began working with local law enforcement to prosecute them on the federal level, where mandatory minimum sentences make jail time much longer. The federal law enacted in 1986 kicked in the mandatory five- and 10-year minimum sentences at a rate 100 times greater for crack cocaine than for the powder variety. And unlike most large federal jurisdictions which tacitly, if not formally, limit their caseload to those involving higher quantities of drugs, the Eastern District of Virginia had no such barrier.

    The choice to prosecute under federal law angered some federal judges and defense attorneys who felt smaller dealers overburdened the federal system. "The federal government filled a void that was existing in state prosecutions," says Howard Vick Jr., a federal drug prosecutor in Richmond from 1990-94 and a local commonwealth's attorney in Henrico County, until 2000.

    The result was soon clear. By 1993, the Eastern District of Virginia had the fourth-highest number of crack cocaine cases in the nation, then 114.

    Then, in 1997, the U.S. Attorney's office decided to crack down on illegal guns. Through a program known as Project Exile, local law enforcement agreed to transfer cases involving illegal gun possession—particularly by felons—from state court to the federal level, where the individuals face a stiffer a five-year mandatory minimum jail time. The effects bled into drug cases because many of the people caught with guns were also charged with crack cocaine dealing. Said Richard Cullen, former U.S. attorney for the Eastern District and later attorney general for Virginia: "We were very aggressive for 10 years and that paid off."

    There was another factor too. The Eastern District of Virginia is known as the "rocket docket" because judges make sure cases move to trial in just a few months, making it possible to move more cases through the system.

    It's a pattern hardly unchanged to this day. In 2006, the Eastern District of Virginia topped the nation in crack cocaine prosecutions with 253—a sign that crack dealers will continue to face heavy enforcement in the region. And Chuck Rosenberg, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia has no regrets. "It's a federal crime, so I don't apologize for prosecuting it."

    1.26.2008

    "...the man allegedly "punched one of our police women in the face, knocking her glasses off,"

    I guess folks have to realize that if there are public officials around, even the smallest of potentially aggressive actions takes on added significance and arouse the interest of those charged with protecting said officials. The cops will come, and when they get there, if someone is "feeling froggy" and jumps, that someone is probably going to end up in a whole lotta pain, if not dead outright. Frankly, I'm surprised that the guy was only tasered after "punching" a police woman in the face.

    Homeless man Tasered during Gov. Gen.'s Vancouver visit

    Staff Reporter, The Province

    Published: Friday, January 25, 2008

    Police Tasered a man in the Downtown Eastside during Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean's tour Thursday night after a scuffle that led to his arrest.

    VPD Const. Tim Fanning said that at about 8:10 a.m. a 35-year-old man of no fixed address was causing a disturbance and blocking the road at Carrall and Hastings streets.

    When two police officers moved in to intervene, there was a scuffle and the man allegedly "punched one of our police women in the face, knocking her glasses off," Fanning said.

    Greater Vancouver Transit Authority Police Service officers in the area came to their assistance and subdued the man with a Taser.

    He was arrested and taken into custody. He was examined by emergency medical crews and cleared. Charges of assaulting a police officer are pending.

    Fanning said that although the man was along the route of the protest, he did not appear to be one of the protesters.

    Police would not release the man's name.

    1.25.2008

    “Snitch and Die”

    A "new" street code? Hardly. Snitches and rats have always been looked upon by street peeps with about the same disdain and disgust as a child molester. In fact, I witnessed a murdered man who ended up that way as a result of his snitch status right after I began serving my sentence back in the 90s for growing the evil weed. This took place at High Desert prison in Northeastern California as I began my reception. I was transferred after a few days to San Quentin because someone I knew well worked at High Desert and apparently the correctional facility was concerned that she might be used to force me to work for someone inside. Stuff like that happens all the time in prison, so in a way, I guess they figured they were doing me a favor, although I hardly think going to San Quentin's Carson Unit for reception was much of a "favor." But I digress. When I was told to "roll up" and prepare for transport to SQ, I had to walk through the main yard and into what I think was an administration area in order to get to an area where a guard would load me for the transport. It ain't like everything is well marked in there, ya know? So anyway, I'm doing the "tough guy" walk and as I entered the facility there was a gurney with a dead dude on it. His throat had been slit something fierce; looked like a huge, ugly neck-smile. A guard I was walking with related how the dude ended up dead. Whether the story is true or not I cannot verify, but someone definitely received a serious neck-notch, there was no doubt about that. It seems a prison rat was given the opportunity to earn some much needed juice by a couple of lifers. If the rat would kill a babyraper, the rat would get a free pass out of much of the harassment and threats he was receiving from fellow inmates. What the rat either didn't know or didn't care about was the shooting policy of guards who witness inmates fighting; something the oldtimers not only know, but use to their advantage. One of the first things you learn when you enter reception is that if a guard yells "GET DOWN" you hit the floor. Right now. You don't look for a place to sit, you don't set your stuff down on a table and leisurely lay yourself down, you hurl yourself to the floor immediately or you risk taking a slug from some sort of firearm. They will shoot you. So the rat, he likes the idea of alleviating some of the hassles he's been enduring, so he agrees to the plan, gets himself a sardine can lid, walks up to babyraper in the yard and slits his throat. According to the guard, Mr. Rat was instantly shot and killed by guards, this providing the lifer plan-architects a "twofer;' they were rid of both a rat and a babyraper, which is a major coup in prison and there are definitely benefits to that. Even many guards hate babyrapers and snitches, so someone who takes one out usually enjoys a large boost of juice (power and prestige, not to mention goodies and benefits). Rappers aren't bringing anything "new" to the game, they are just bringing traditional attention to a very longstanding street code. Frankly, I think most folks recognize that ratting off your neighbor or your friend is a bad thing; we've been taught since we were children that no one likes "a tattletale." Added to this is the increasingly polarizing and adversarial appearance of the police as "us against them" in much of society's poorer sections. Whites are no longer immune to brutality and abusive, disgusting behavior "under the color of authority" and cops have increased their own animosity and "hardnosedness" in response to an ever-growing attitude of "cop-hating." Pile on some wicked social injustices and oppressive governmental tactics designed to keep people fighting amongst themselves instead of addressing the bigger issues, an ever-widening gap between haves and have-nots, political leaders that are apathetic and rubber-stamp policies inherently unfair and/or biased, a lack of upward advancement opportunities and by golly, you seem to be fomenting all the pieces necessary to alienate very large segment of the population from the mainstream. Now that population is so large it is becoming a mainstream..... It's no wonder that there's a code on the street. It's no wonder that code is taking on increasing significance, either, what with the ridiculous number of Americans being tossed into the pokey every day..... ‘Start snitching,’ crime-hit communities urge
    Campaign against witness intimidation confronts pop culture message
    By Alex Johnson
    Reporter
    MSNBC
    updated 2:38 p.m. CT, Tues., Jan. 22, 2008

    Saying they are frightened that a “no snitching” code is taking root in American society, political and civic leaders across the country are pushing witnesses to find the courage to step forward and help police investigate violent crimes.

    The campaign has taken on added urgency with the pending release of a sequel to “Stop F***ing Snitching,” a notorious DVD blamed for glamorizing street violence in Baltimore and intimidating witnesses to keep them silent. The DVD circulated nationally — thanks in part to a performance by professional basketball star Carmelo Anthony — inspiring “Stop Snitching” caps and T-shirts and a rap music subgenre that has attracted superstar performers like Snoop Dogg, Ice Cube and The Game.

    Urly Media is promoting “Stop Snitching 2” as a “shockumentary” meant “to show the reality of hard times on hard streets.” In a trailer for the DVD on Urly Media’s Web site, a small child is shown waving a large revolver and smoking what appears to be a marijuana joint, a man is shown firing a gun into the air, and numerous people talk about the need to kill “rats” and “snitches.”

    “This snitching thing is an ongoing thing. You hear it everywhere — don’t snitch, don’t snitch,” said Gloria Fant, whose 18-year-old grandson was shot and killed last year in Bristol Township, Pa. In July, someone scrawled the message “Snitch and Die” in chalk on a street near the scene.

    Neighborhood residents said the graffito was left on the street for almost a month before it was finally removed, sending a chilling message to witnesses.

    “It’s a rule, code of the street,” said Kyle Gallishaw, who lives in Bristol Township. “If you’re not from the street, then you wouldn’t understand.”

    Silent witnesses cripple prosecutions Some commentators argue that mainstream culture doesn’t understand the phenomenon, maintaining that the “stop snitching” message is targeted at criminals who implicate others to save themselves.

    “In the black community it is commonly understood that a snitch is a crafty criminal who negotiates a deal for himself by telling on others,” Edrea Davis, author of the novel “SnitchCraft,” wrote in an essay on Baller Status, a Web site devoted to African-American issues.

    “Since the days of slavery, providing information to authorities to gain favor has been viewed negatively,” wrote Davis, who called the stop snitching movement a “hoax.” “Judas would be considered a snitch primarily because he was one of the disciples, one of the crew.”

    But police and families of crime victims say the intention is irrelevant — what is heard on the street is that any cooperation with the authorities is dangerous.

    “They’re afraid to get involved,” said Bernie de la Rionda, a state prosecutor in Jacksonville, Fla., for 24 years.

    “What I have seen is a dramatic increase in witnesses who have seen a murder occur — which is as violent a crime as you can get — and they don’t want to become involved because they don’t want to be labeled a snitch,” he said.

    Law enforcement officials in other communities large and small agreed that the “no snitching” ethic was making their jobs significantly more difficult and leaving violent criminals on the streets.

    For example, police in Nashville, Tenn., remain unable to identify credible witnesses to the shooting of Demarius Lacey, 17, who was killed as he talked with several people in broad daylight Sept. 5.

    “In certain neighborhoods, they won’t talk to us because they are afraid of retaliation,” said Nashville police Officer Anna Maria Williams. “They are afraid of what their friends might say.”

    Similarly, police in Rochester, N.Y., have made no arrests four months after Latasha Shaw, 36, was beaten and stabbed to death by what was described as a mob after she rushed to a street corner to help her daughter, who was being attacked. Police said that although a large number of people saw the killing, they have made little progress because of witness intimidation.

    “The things that go on in this community are not a police problem. It’s a community problem,” said City Council member Adam McFadden, who said he had applied for a pistol permit and would personally offer armed protection to witnesses who would come forward in the case.

    ‘If someone will kill once, they’ll kill again’ The “stop snitching” campaign has galvanized many in Rochester besides McFadden. The outcry grew early last month after Keon Anderson, 19, was charged with second-degree murder in the shooting death of a convenience store clerk. The shooting came just six weeks after Anderson was acquitted of murder in another shooting when two key prosecution witnesses bailed out at the last minute.

    One of the witnesses, a 13-year-old boy who showed up for court with a fat lip and other injuries, said he had been beaten up for cooperating with police. Subsequently, the other witness, a 14-year-old boy, was not called to testify.

    “I’ve often said if someone will kill once, they’ll kill again, and those that protect murderers and follow the dreaded ‘do not snitch’ focus ... end up adding to the problem,” Rochester Mayor Bob Duffy said.

    For witnesses, a violence-tinged dilemma When witnesses do muster up the courage to cooperate, the consequences can be stark:

  • In Mesa, Ariz., a 38-year-old woman who reported a couple to the authorities for child abuse was kidnapped and beaten last summer and had the word “snitch” burned onto her face with a branding iron.
  • In Silver Spring, Md., Parris Pratt, 23, was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole in August for killing a 16-year-old boy she suspected of having given information to the police. Pratt fired two shots at the boy’s head, then stood over him and fired a third shot into his head. She returned to her car and began to drive off, but when she saw the boy move, she got out and shot him again in the head.
  • And in Baltimore — home to the original “stop snitching” movement — Carl Lackl, 38, was shot to death in July before he could testify as the main prosecution witness in a 2006 homicide. The suspect in the 2006 slaying faces murder charges in Lackl’s killing.
  • Political leaders and law enforcement agencies say the scourge of witness intimidation threatens to cripple the legal system, and they have undertaken dramatic initiatives to reverse the tide.

    Confronted by an entrenched “don’t snitch” ethic in Philadelphia, where the murder rate surpasses that of larger cities like New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, Philadelphia’s new mayor, Michael Nutter, declared a crime emergency one hour into his term of office this month, strengthening the hand of the police.

    “Instead of this campaign of ‘stop snitching,’ maybe we need to start one of ‘start snitching,’ because you’ve got to tell us what’s going on out there in these neighborhoods so we can get the people responsible for these crimes off the street,” said Charles Ramsey, the city’s new police commissioner.

    Police plan to deploy 250 surveillance cameras across Philadelphia over the next 10 months to collect video evidence of crimes in which witnesses are mum.

    “We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: A camera is a witness that will not be intimidated,” Deputy Police Commissioner Jack Gaittens said.

    In Rochester — where McFadden, the City Council member, offered to protect witnesses himself — police and prosecutors are joining with Baber AME Church to blanket the city with billboards and bus placards encouraging cooperation with the authorities.

    “We really also need to create some kind of better measure of how we are going to protect those that will come forward and will help to solve these cases,” the church’s pastor, the Rev. Marlowe Washington, said of the “You bet I told!” campaign.

    Taking on thugs in the streets And residents of Jacksonville, Fla., will soon see thousands of placards calling for public cooperation with police on public spaces and private lawns, thanks to Men Against Destruction-Defending Against Drugs and Social-Disorder, or MAD DADS, an anti-crime group with chapters in 16 states.

    “We need to open up and start cooperating with police, even if it means turning in a friend, a family member, and even against the fear of retaliation,” said the Rev. Eddie Staton, the group’s national president.

    The Jacksonville initiative, which seeks the involvement of thousands of individual residents, reflects a growing belief that the best answer cannot be provided by government officials’ telling people not to be afraid. It is an argument that must be made witness by witness, home by home, neighborhood by neighborhood.

    After watching a television show that encouraged people to stop snitching, Marcus Hampton of Nashville came up with an idea of his own.

    “DoSnitch is a way to go online and anonymously report crime,” Hampton said of the Web site he founded in May 2006, DoSnitch.com. With a click, people who see crimes can report them without fear.

    “It’s aiding them in getting that dope dealer off the corner, reporting that guy who broke into your neighbor’s house,” Hampton said.

    DoSnitch advises law enforcement officials when asked, but it remains a private effort, unaffiliated with any police force or government agency. To Hampton, it’s about the community’s determination to “crack that no-snitch code.”

    The site, he said, lets people know “it’s all right to report a crime, it’s all right to save your family, save your neighborhood by taking those bad people off the streets.”

    URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22734240/

    "...the event is meant to be a "symbolic gesture'' and "by no means ... a realistic portrayal''

    While it doesn't quite make for a real experience, it raises money to help combat homelessness, which is exceptionally hard to come by for many right now, so these kids are providing an invaluable service to those who need it most...

    Home | Local + Metro | North Metro

    Student sleepout aims to help out homeless

    Last update: January 24, 2008 - 6:24 PM

    Sleeping bags? Check.

    Tarps? Check.

    Cardboard boxes? Check.

    That's the supply list for about 70 north metro high school students who will brave the cold tonight in a 12-hour sleepout to raise money and awareness about homelessness.

    The National Honor Society (NHS) students from St. Anthony Village High and Spring Lake Park High are holding the sleepout starting at 9 p.m. outside St. Anthony Village High.

    Jason Haugen, a teacher and the NHS adviser at St. Anthony Village High, said Thursday that the students had a "real desire to help when they saw how many homeless children there are.''

    Last year, students raised $7,000 for the cause. This year's goal is $8,000.

    He emphasized that the event is meant to be a "symbolic gesture'' and "by no means ... a realistic portrayal'' of the hardships that homeless people have to endure.

    Tonight was forecast to be relatively balmy for the frigid week -- with a projected low in the teens -- but the windchill should dip below zero.

    As well as plenty of sleeping bags and blankets, the students will have access to the school building to warm up when they need to. Adult chaperones will also check in on the group.

    The money raised will go to People Serving People, a Minneapolis nonprofit that provides shelter and a variety of services to more than 3,000 people a year.

    To donate, checks can be sent to People Serving People at 614 S. 3rd St., Minneapolis, MN 55415.

    ""It's not that bad," ..."But I'd hate to have to do this every day, especially in this weather."

    What's disturbing about this piece is that a judge uses the condition of homelessness as a punishment to mete out to someone. This odd choice carries with it an insidious perception builder among those who don't know better - and there are many out there that don't: homelessness is bad because it's used as a punishment, so those who are homeless must then be bad persons, otherwise, why would they be homeless?

    Man who stole from Salvation Army kettle serves 'homeless' sentence

    Friday, January 25, 2008
    Patrick O'Donnell
    Plain Dealer Reporter

    Painesville- Nathen Smith sagged in a chair in the Lake County Sheriff's Office lobby, his jacket zipped tight and hands jammed in pockets to fight off his shivering.

    Seven hours into a 24-hour stint as one of the homeless, Smith was already tired, cold and a little hungry. But he had braced himself for a night of making this chair his home.

    "It's not that bad," he said. "But I'd hate to have to do this every day, especially in this weather. It's too cold to do it in this." Smith, 28, of Painesville is the latest to receive a creative sentence that Painesville Municipal Court Judge Michael Cicconetti has made his trademark.

    As punishment for stealing one of the Salvation Army's iconic collection kettles shortly before Christmas, Smith was given the choice of the standard sentence of 90 days in jail or spending the next 24 hours as a homeless man.

    Starting immediately.

    When Smith chose the latter option, Cicconetti made him empty his pockets and turn over all his money and credit cards. Court officers strapped a Global Positioning System device to his ankle to monitor his whereabouts.

    And he was sent out onto the streets of Painesville with no advice or guidance.

    "He was like everyone else who finds themselves out on the street," Cicconetti said. "I didn't want him to have any money on him. I want him to learn. It's not going to hurt to be a little cold."

    Weather forecasts predicted 10-degree temperatures with wind chill as low as minus 5.

    He was banned from going home or staying with friends. The GPS system tracked his movements and a printout will be given to the judge when he returns at 11 a.m. to serve just three days in jail and learn what community service he must do.

    Smith, who lives with his mother and is unemployed, used a public phone at the nearby Department of Job and Family Services office to call his mother. She brought him a sweatshirt and ski pants, but no money or food. Smith said she is unhappy about the theft and neither of them wanted to test the judge's rules.

    The rest of the afternoon, he said, he walked around downtown Painesville looking for ways to keep busy and warm. Though Painesville has the county's only homeless shelter, Smith never tried to seek a bed there. "I didn't think I was allowed," he said, stressing he worried about misinterpreting Cicconetti's instructions. Though Cicconetti gave no instructions for finding the shelter, he would have allowed Smith to stay there if he contacted it.

    Knowing the sheriff's headquarters has a large lobby, he headed there about 4 p.m. It was either there, he said, or the emergency room waiting area at the county hospital. His plan, he said, was to stay in the lobby all night, at least out of the wind. Even as other homeless men gathered in that same lobby for the nightly bus to the shelter, he stayed put.

    But he had no backup plan if deputies told him to leave.

    "There's nowhere for me to find shelter," he said, trying to warm up after walking in the cold.

    But he said he was willing to pay the price for his crime, which he said was stupid.

    "If I had a chance to go back, I'd change things so that I never took it, period," he said.

    1.24.2008

    Nashvillian Power Brokers - Are You Listening?

    Another article that needs no further comment.....
    Errol Louis

    Man with a plan offers hope

    Thursday, January 24th 2008, 4:00 AM

    It's hard to be sure exactly what the candidates for President plan to do about America's homeless crisis if elected - nobody's talking about the issue very much - but a good place to start would be to give a raise, a promotion and some close attention to Philip Mangano, executive director of the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness.

    Mangano's official job sounds complex - coordinating the homelessness initiatives of 20 sprawling federal agencies, including the departments of Housing, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture and Justice - but his goal is simple.

    Calling himself a modern abolitionist, Mangano says he's leading a movement to make homelessness extinct, a relic of the past like slavery and racial segregation.

    Sounds like a plan to me.

    "If good intentions, well-meaning programs and humanitarian gestures would solve homelessness, it would have been history long ago," he recently told the Daily News Editorial Board. The fact that about 195,000 people sleep in shelters or on American streets every night, he said, is "a national disgrace."

    Mangano's solution is to work with cities and counties - including New York City - to create 10-year plans to shrink the population of chronically homeless. A key part of the plan involves doing solid research on the world of homelessness, including counting how much panhandlers make and how much money cities and counties spend on medical and legal services for the homeless.

    According to Mangano, 65 studies show that each homeless person costs local government between $35,000 and $150,000 every year in police, medical and detox services. "For what they were spending in San Diego, it would have been cheaper to put the homeless in seaside villas with concierge service," he said. "Compare that to $13,000 to $25,000 a year for a room with supportive services."

    In Denver, a study found that panhandlers were collectively begging $4 million a year in spare change from passersby, but with no long-term improvement to show for it. The Mile High City's now trying an innovative solution: attaching special coin receptacles to parking meters and encouraging residents to donate through the meters - the proceeds of which go to organized charities - rather than giving to panhandlers.

    "No data or research supports random giving as changing a person's life," says Mangano, who has been urging other cities to try Denver's approach. What does work, he says, is putting people in low-cost housing with support services like a nurse to make sure residents with mental problems take their medicine regularly.

    New York is trying an innovative approach: rapidly rehousing homeless people and then giving them medical and other services - a break from the past, when people would have to jump through bureaucratic hoops before getting a temporary apartment.

    Mangano says the policy, along with the ongoing work of nonprofits like Common Ground Community, which builds and maintains housing for the homeless, may end up being a model for other cities to follow.

    That beats the heck out of harassing the homeless by passing ordinances, as many frustrated cities are doing. Since the beginning of the year, according to USA Today, Nashville has outlawed panhandling near ATMs, bus stops and cafes; St. Petersburg has designated a "no begging" zone near downtown, and Fayetteville, N.C., has outlawed panhandling after dark.

    Such efforts inevitably lead to court, where civil libertarians argue that begging is free speech.

    Mangano has the more sensible and compassionate approach: change our thinking so that a simple act of compassion - making sure all of our neighbors have a place to lay their heads - is what we come to expect of our leaders and ourselves.

    Smiling does a body good

    Democracy Now Livestream