12.31.2007

"...Project 50 should be watched, rather than dismissed as a ridiculously puny response."

It appears that Project 50 mimics the Housing First model by targeting those who are chronically homeless and have very little hope of ever turning that around on their own. These are the folks who are either so mentally or physically ill, or have such insurmountable societal problems as to relegate them to the streets and alleys forever without intervention. And if you think that being so far down as to never be able to get back up again is impossible in America, you'd better think again - for thousands of people it is a daily reality. These are the folks who, by the way, place tremendous drains on our social "safety nets;" police, ambulance, healthcare, because they have no "regular" way of addressing problems or receiving care. The hidden costs to society as a direct result of these folks are astronomical as well and I hope soon to be able to cite a Vanderbilt study that is currently underway to provide some real evidence supporting my claim here. Suffice it to say, opting to foot the bill for housing with no strings attached is still going to end up being cheaper overall than allowing them to live out their lives on the street. It all boils down to cost benefit and what's best for the greater good, baby. As I mentioned in a post yesterday, I'd like to see my tax dollars pay for something I'm in favor of for a change. The second article here has some ideas and statements that I'd like to address when I have a little more time, so look for some additional comments to be added on this subject soon.
OPINION DAILY

A homeless breakthrough?

Project 50’s early success could make the city and county see the light on agreeing to a single plan.
By Robert Greene December 31, 2007
The most vulnerable person living on the streets of skid row is a 65-year-old veteran who has been homeless for 37 years. He has kidney and liver disease, has been to hospital emergency rooms four times in the last three months and has been arrested four times in the last six months. Los Angeles County officials know this because 25 county workers canvassed downtown streets in December, waking and interviewing people in the early morning hours. They ended up with a list of 50 in a sort of catalog of doom and hope. Doom, because the 50 are those most likely to die on the streets if not rescued (see, for example, the Dec. 21 report (PDF) from the Los Angeles Coalition to End Hunger & Homelessness, which calculates homeless deaths in the county at one every day). And hope, because the county and city have promised to put them in permanent homes with the medical, mental, drug and other care that they need. It's part of Project 50, imported from New York City by Common Ground, the organization that has achieved some notable success in getting chronically homeless people off Manhattan's streets and into housing and care. At a briefing last month, county workers and leaders were cautiously upbeat about the project, and there's no reason they shouldn't be. They bit off a piece of the homelessness problem that is relatively easy to digest. There are more than 70,000 people living in the parks, under the freeway offramps and on the streets of Los Angeles County. As Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky put it, "The problem is just too daunting, so we go on and do other things." Housing 50 people, though, ought to be something that City Hall, with its housing funds and programs, and Los Angeles County, with its service programs, can manage. The region has the wealth and expertise to end chronic homelessness and, in fact, may also have the service providers already on hand to do what Common Ground is doing. But importing this team from New York cut through the starts-and-stops of homeless fixes that have been tried here before.
City and county government have sometimes appeared to be in the doldrums on homelessness, like sailors who used to get stuck in the tropics when the winds disappeared. Some ships were stranded forever, and their passengers died of hunger, thirst and boredom. Others appeared stalled but actually were making great progress as the currents, rather than the winds, moved them forward. It can be hard to tell whether the city and county are drifting or moving toward a common destination. A county plan for five service centers was scrapped, in part because of neighborhood resistance. The city was sued over its law to ban sidewalk sleeping and criticized over its initiative to step up skid row arrests. Still, there is evidence that both governments are making some progress. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has reinvented housing strategies while designating $100 million for housing the homeless. The county, while abandoning its five-centers plan, is putting up an equal amount for supportive services in those new homes. County Supervisor Gloria Molina is leading efforts to get children off the streets, instituting a zero-tolerance policy for kids on skid row. Last year, Molina's efforts pulled 696 children into shelters and, of them, 160 into permanent housing. So Project 50 should be watched, rather than dismissed as a ridiculously puny response. Phase 1 — gathering data — was a success. Now, this month, begins Phase 2: putting the 50 in homes. Then comes Phase 3 and the real challenge: keeping them there. For the effort ever to go beyond 50, much more is required. New York City spends more than $1.7 billion a year on housing and caring for the homeless, so L.A.'s financial commitment still falls far short. The county must agree to join the city's process for funding supportive housing. The county and city must join on a 10-year plan for getting the homeless housed. And perhaps the biggest challenge: Communities must make room for supportive housing. But Project 50, if it works, can help start moving the players in the same direction.

L.A. County might get new homeless program

Supervisors expected to approve Project 50, which aims to get skid row's most vulnerable people into supportive housing.
By Susannah Rosenblatt, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer November 19, 2007
Los Angeles County supervisors are poised to approve a program that will identify the 50 most vulnerable homeless people on downtown's skid row and move them within 100 days into apartments with readily accessible support services. The program, patterned after projects underway in New York City and elsewhere, is not only aimed at saving the lives of those most likely to die on the streets, but also is expected to save taxpayers the millions of dollars typically spent on people who cycle in and out of shelters, jails and emergency rooms.
FOR THE RECORD: Homeless: An article in Monday's California section about a Los Angeles County proposal for helping 50 of the most vulnerable homeless people on downtown's skid row misquoted Philip Mangano of the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness. He was quoted as saying the chronically homeless are "fragile in terms of both fiscal and psychological health." He actually said "physical," not "fiscal." —

FOR THE RECORD: Homeless program: An article in the Nov. 19 California section stated incorrectly that the homeless advocacy organization Common Ground provides traditional shelter-type housing for homeless people. The organization provides mainly permanent housing with social services, as well as long-term transitional housing. —
"A lot of these folks fall through the cracks when they go through the shelters," said Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, a major proponent of the project. "If we can't make this work, then we've got a problem." On Tuesday, the board will probably approve two contracts with homeless advocacy groups to provide training and housing for the program. Four of the five supervisors have indicated they support the program. The county has struggled to address the vast homelessness problem. A year ago, supervisors approved an unprecedented $100-million homeless initiative, anchored by five regional assistance centers. But the program faltered after communities balked at the prospect of homeless people coming to their neighborhoods. The county quietly switched gears, deciding instead to fund private organizations and smaller efforts, such as a housing program for families on skid row. The county's slow progress has fueled skepticism from some. Many of the details of Project 50 -- including cost, staffing and location -- have yet to be worked out. The board is expected to ask Tuesday for a more detailed plan within 30 days. About one-third of the county's roughly 70,000 homeless people are classified as chronically homeless -- meaning they have lived on the streets for a year or more and have disabilities such as AIDS or mental illness. Many experts say placing the chronically homeless in permanent housing with social services nearby is more effective than providing them with temporary shelter and more effective than requiring them to get sober before finding them housing. The numbers back up that position: 85% of homeless people living in supportive housing stay off the streets, said Gary Blasi, a UCLA law professor who has studied homelessness. Chronically homeless people are "fragile in terms of both fiscal and psychological health," said Philip Mangano, executive director of the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, which has endorsed such "housing first" programs. "Delivering the treatment and other services that they need is more effectively done when a person is in a stable location," Mangano said. New York City-based Common Ground, which is slated to get one of the two county contracts, housed many of the homeless people living in Times Square and helped launch similar efforts elsewhere. The agency's staff will train local teams to survey skid row residents. Outreach workers will take a visual inventory of the area over a two-week period to observe who sleeps there regularly. Officials will follow up in person, talking to as many people as possible to learn about their health, time spent on the streets and other factors to determine how vulnerable they are. The so-called vulnerability index will determine those most at risk of dying on skid row, and outreach workers will talk with them about moving voluntarily into supportive housing provided by the Skid Row Housing Trust, which is expected to be awarded the second contract Tuesday. The organization helps refurbish and provide housing to the homeless and other needy people. The 50 people identified will have caseworkers to help them and nearby support services, such as mental health and substance abuse counselors. The Department of Veterans Affairs of Greater Los Angeles will work with the street teams to identify veterans, who represent 12% of the county's homeless population. Common Ground has long worked to develop traditional shelter-type housing for homeless people in New York and elsewhere. The agency claims its Times Square project, similar to the program proposed in Los Angeles, helped house about 90% of the people living on the streets in that part of Manhattan. It also is bringing its "street to home" approach to areas of Brooklyn and Queens. The costs of shelter, emergency room care and incarceration can range from $40,000 to $150,000 per homeless person per year, said Blasi, the UCLA professor. Supportive housing for one individual costs between $14,000 and $25,000, he added. County officials acknowledge criticism that the program targets a small group in a large population of needy people, but they hope to eventually expand it across skid row and elsewhere. Some advocates agree with the county and say starting slow is the way to go. Rebecca Isaacs, executive director of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, said "the idea is to pick something . . . that is manageable" and can become a model for a larger effort. But some question the county's ability to pull off this new project and wonder whether it eventually will include enough people to make a difference in what is widely acknowledged to be the nation's largest homeless population. "It's a step in the right direction, but, in my opinion, it's too small of a step," said Orlando Ward, public affairs director for skid row's Midnight Mission. "Let's get this elephant moving." Ward said local officials tend to "just build permanent supportive housing and hope somebody lands in it. "L.A. has never been that sophisticated in their approach," he said. Former software developer Brian Tierney should know. When Tierney, 48, lost his job, he said he drifted from the sidewalks of Long Beach to L.A.'s skid row, living outside "like an animal" for several years before chance and some kind strangers helped guide him to a small, clean, subsidized apartment at the St. George Hotel downtown. But he thinks Project 50 could be a hard sell to the people who need it most. After a recent police crackdown cleared some of skid row's streets, "the people that are left out there are really hard-core street people," Tierney said. "Those people have been out there so long, they would be really uncomfortable inside." Reaching that population requires a gentle, skillful approach, said Tierney, who lives in an 86-unit building with support services similar to those envisioned in Project 50. The St. George offers a medical examination room in the basement, as well as caseworkers, a psychiatrist, a doctor and a nurse. The program is funded largely by federal and other grants. L.A. City Councilwoman Jan Perry, whose district includes parts of skid row, said she hopes Project 50 can build on existing programs run by local agencies. And she'd prefer to see people already in emergency shelter beds given the first chance at more permanent supportive housing. "They've already made a proactive choice to come in off the street into a bed," said Perry. "Their chances of recovery are already enhanced." Los Angeles has long lagged behind other cities in offering modern homeless services, traditionally emphasizing shelter beds clustered on skid row rather than stable housing with support services, according to advocates elsewhere. County officials are hoping Project 50 can help change that.

12.30.2007

"The hope is that the stability of a home will help street people clean up their lives. This is nuts."

No. What's nuts is that we continue placing band aids on problems that won't go away. I'll be the first to admit that there are some serious concerns with the Housing First model but the concerns usually arise around the issues of "behavior control and modification" and the "why do they get for free what the rest of us pay for" complaints. To be perfectly honest, there is something that rubs me the wrong way about "rewarding" a person with a free house because they have managed to stay stoned and incompetent for their entire adult life. Why them and not me, too? However, the real reason here is cost effectiveness. Mr. Kelly complains that this might be a "huge pile of money is wasted." Surely Mr. Kelly is not so naive or blind to government spending debacles on a much larger scale that occur daily here in our country and benefit no one in need? Maybe Mr. Kelly would ask is why it is that we don't have the necessary drug and alcohol treatment slots available for the millions of Americans - thousands of whom are currently homeless - and who are currently on waiting lists to get assistance for their addictions? It's been proven over and over again that treatment is on average seven times more effective than incarceration and much cheaper in the long-run, to boot. Maybe Mr. Kelly would like to address the fact that for so many of these people, there is absolutely no hope of ever getting off of those streets because of the way we've set our society up to continue punishing those who have made mistakes in their past? Another area to examine for Mr. Kelly would be why it is that we can't afford to provide full wrap around services for the folks we get into "transitional housing," thereby nullifying any beneficial effects of transitional housing in the first place? Or perhaps Mr. Kelly would do better addressing why it is that in many areas, our public schools don't even have the money for textbooks to provide the fundamental backbone to a person's long term success in this country, a good education? Maybe too Mr. Kelly would like to address why it is that states are woefully underfunded and ill prepared to care for the millions of Americans who have mental illnesses but can't get treatment or the money to afford prescriptions when they do get treatment? While we're at it, why doesn't Mr. Kelly examine why it is that a person can't exist on a minimum wage job, much less pay for the costs of living "inside?" To be sure, many of the chronically homeless are "messed up" but there's no doubt at all that our society has played at least some role in keeping them down - way down -after that first "mess up." Not sure if Mr. Kelly has any idea about Maslov and his Hierarchy of needs, but If a person doesn't have a roof over their head, it's pretty hard to worry about cleaning up one's act in other areas. Frankly if I was still out there on the street, I'd be stoned every day because the misery of living like that would soon have me contemplating hurling myself off a bridge somewhere - I was about as close to suicide as one could get without actually pulling the trigger at the time I met the woman who gave me a second lease on life. So what that we give this tiny percentage of our population a chance to regroup, get off the street, begin thinking about things on a little longer term basis than where we'll be bedding down tonite? Is this money coming out of Mr. Kelly's pocket directly? I have to put up with all kinds of what I feel are wasteful government spending plans; I'm happy to divert my tax dollars to assisting my "street" brothers and sisters for a change. Beats the hell out of sending it to Alaska on the Ferry to Nowhere. No telling what that might do for some of these folks. Might even help some of them consider attending some NA or AA meetings or seek some work, since they would now be able to get some real, safe rest, take a hot shower, maybe have a bite to eat and head off to work like the rest of us do. Mr. Kelly has obviously never experienced homelessness, nor does he know what it takes to live on the street. It would appear that he's simply concerned that someone might get something for nothing, and even that logic is flawed since if he was really concerned about that, he'd be screaming bloody murder at the amount of foreign aid traveling out of our country and into oblivion on a daily basis. While it does bother me too that some of these people will get what the rest of us work for, no one said life was fair and until I know the whole story for most of these folks, I'll need to suspend judging them in this area. Furthermore, I'd prefer we spend some of our hard earned tax money on taking care of our own for a change. So while Mr. Kelly's argument has some validity, it's easily overshadowed by arguments about why it is so many of our American citizens are suffering in a country that could eliminate poverty and provide ample, real treatment for drug addiction, mental illness, and alcoholism within a couple of months, if it were so inclined to do so.... Homeless apartment plan is a short-sighted idea Sunday, December 30, 2007

IN THE delicate world of social engineering, Passaic County is now at a crossroads. It may become a place where an ambitious program improves the lives of hundreds of homeless people. Or it could be the spot where a huge pile of money is wasted.

Sadly, waste is the more likely scenario.

Not to cast too dismal a shadow over the much-touted "Housing First" initiative that is about to begin in Passaic County, but this pilot program contains such a massive common sense flaw at its center that even experienced homeless advocates question whether it can work. With $1.4 million in federal housing funds earmarked in Passaic County for "Housing First," this is no small matter.

"Housing First" is one of those programs that looks good on paper.

The goal is to target the most difficult of homeless people – the so-called "street people" who make up about 20 percent of the overall homeless population. Most are men. And many are drug addicts, alcoholics and those suffering from a variety of mental problems.

In plain language, they are messed up. Many often spent years drifting from shelters, to jails, to hospital emergency rooms and any place they can lay their head in the great outdoors. In northern New Jersey, we have found them living under highway bridges, in dugouts of Little League baseball fields and in trash bins.

The idea at the heart of the "Housing First" program is to give free apartments to these otherwise helpless street people without requiring them to get sober or enter counseling that might help them get their lives back on track. The hope is that the stability of a home will help street people clean up their lives.

This is nuts.

"Housing First" is not really about lending a hand to people in need. This is another example of a politically correct government program that avoids hard decisions for fear of being criticized as too moralistic.

Of all America's social problems, finding stable homes for "street people" is one of the most difficult to solve. The dilemma is not so much the lack of places to live, but other problems that include drug addiction, mental illness and alcoholism, which render many chronically homeless people incapable of making even the most basic decisions.

Anyone who has spent time with street people knows that many of these poor souls can't even wash their clothes, find a job or cook a nutritious meal. Some are so burdened with mental problems that they need constant supervision, perhaps even a room in a mental hospital.

Even when given a bed in a homeless shelter, many end up back on the street within days. Hence, the cruel nickname of "street people."

But a chief reason for the quick return to the street is that many of these chronically homeless can't – or won't – abide by a basic rule of shelters that they stop drinking booze or taking drugs.

Rather than facing up to the issue of drugs and booze as a root cause of chronic homelessness, the "Housing First" program simply avoids it. Chronically homeless people, accepted by "Housing First," are simply given money to rent an apartment. After that, there are no rules on their behavior.

Yes, counselors are supposed to visit the apartments on a regular basis. But there is no requirement that a formerly homeless person enter counseling or stop drinking booze and taking drugs. And while crack and heroin are obviously illegal, having a private apartment is an open invitation for an addict to continue taking drugs. After all, it's private and hidden from the cops.

So why have this program anyway?

The answer reveals a sad truth about our government – namely, that money rules.

Studies show that "Housing First" is cheaper than giving street people vouchers for motels – a common practice on cold nights in Passaic County. "Housing First" also costs about the same as providing a bed in a homeless shelter. But with "Housing First," there is no need for additional buildings for shelters or a large staff to run them.

At any time, Passaic County has roughly 350 "street people." Suppose all of them are given money for apartments. And suppose they all remain in those apartments for a year or two.

What about their addictions that caused their homelessness in the first place? How do those problems get solved?

Housing First is nothing more than a program that allows us to turn our backs on the serious causes of chronic homelessness.

That's not social engineering.

That's social cluelessness.

Mike Kelly is a Record columnist. Contact him at kellym@northjersey.com. Send comments about this column to The Record at letterstotheeditor@northjersey.com.

12.29.2007

Sometimes "they give up, leaving their children with grandparents or more stable aunts and uncles, or allowing them to go into foster care."

I know firsthand what it's like to be a single father raising two children while mired in poverty, and it is a real bitch, let me tell you. I have nothing but respect for the women who must take on this task because "no-show" dads chump out, but women have traditionally gotten better treatment than the men who try to take on that role alone. I realize this isn't true across the board, but generally speaking, I think its accurate. Anecdotal case in point: when my ex-wife went off the deep end on a cocaine induced psychosis back in 1987, I had just moved to California and was working as an EMT II for a little mom and pop ambulance service in the Northeastern Sierra Nevada mountains. I received a call from the her parents and was told that the ex was in no condition to care for the children so I'd need to take them full time. I did so without hesitation, flying them out to Reno, NV immediately. I cared for those children for two years without any financial support from my ex-wife, which in my mind wasn't really a big deal, but there is a reason I mention it that I'll get to shortly. At the end of two years, the ex was sufficiently "rehabbed" enough to retake physical custody of the kids. I wrestled with allowing them to go but in the end, decided that children needed their mother more so than their father on a full time basis. That she hadn't seen them in two years also weighed heavily upon my mind and I knew how terribly bad I would have missed them had the shoes been on the other feet. I also knew that her parents would ensure their grandchildren received quite probably a far better lifestyle than I was able to provide for them at the time, and rationalizing away, I put the kids on a plane and sent them back to Michigan to be with their mother. A couple of weeks after they'd gone, I realized that I would never be able to send money to my ex the way we used to do it, since I was barely scraping by on what I was earning at the moment, so I approached my payroll office at my place of employment and asked if they would be able to send some money out of each of my checks back to my ex for child support. They stated that they could only do so with a court order, so I stupidly went down to our local courthouse and inquired how I could go about getting a support order initiated so that I could pay child support. When we'd originally split up, we'd also split the kids' time between us, since neither was in school yet. I'd take them for two weeks, then she'd take them for two weeks, and it worked fairly well for both of us. We'd never had a support order, nor did we ever hassle over money for the kids since we were essentially splitting everything down the middle. That of course changed when I left for California, but I didn't know how much until about a month after I'd gone into our local support office to request that support order. It turns out that my ex had started a welfare claim about two months prior to going off the deep on on the crack pipe. Now, I suspect many of you know that If someone uses public assistance, the state goes after the absent parent to collect child support. Having grown up without my own father and watching my mother struggle mightily to care for me and my sister has forever burned the responsibility of caring for ones' own children into my brain, but for a great many other "men," this is not the case. So having a legal way to collect money from the absent parent is, in theory, a great thing since deadbeat dads give us men a horrible name, and there are thousands of deadbeat dads out there. What's not a good thing is having the support office run by bureaucrats who can't think themselves out of a paper bag. About a month after I innocently and naively filed the request to initiate child support, I received a letter from our local support office stating that I was some $11,000 in arrears and if I didn't pay this money in full I would be arrested for failure to pay child support. According to the letter, I hadn't paid a dime of support in the past two years (no shit?) and I was in serious trouble. Thank the Gods they weren't suspending driver's licenses for this back then, or I'd have been driving my kids all over the countryside without a license. If I'd had an accident during that time all that money I'd paid into insurance wouldn't have covered me or them for squat, since I would have technically been driving illegally. The nasty letter I received had a court date scheduled on it, which I attended. The judge said he "empathized" with me because it didn't seem fair that I could be charged support when I'd had full possession of the kids, but he couldn't do shit for me, since the order originated out of another state. They slammed my paltry check with a huge deduction. The child support staff suggested I contact the county where the support order originated from. I left that courthouse so pissed off I could hardly function. It was easy for me to see how someone could snap after dealing with these incompetent fools. I contacted the support office in the county where the order had originated. They treated me like a piece of fecal material but I managed to get them to set up a phone court hearing with a judge who could actually do something. I shouldn't have gotten my hopes up. Prior to the hearing, I was asked by the support staff to send proof that I'd had the kids with me for those two years, which I did. I figured once I gave them this info, they'd not only squash my arrears but would initiate an arrears order on the mother. Boy, was I stupid. The judge wanted money and he didn't give a rats ass who it came from. He wasn't about to "let me off the hook" (his words) for this money. His rationale? That the mother needed a place for the kids to return to when she did get them back! Then he shifted the burden onto my back further; according to him, I was supposed to have contacted the court to tell them I had the children so that they could have placed a hold on my support payments! When I told him that I had never even been notified of a support order being put in place, he stated simply that my ignorance didn't absolve me of my responsibility. Unbelievably, someone in the hearing from the child support staff stated to the judge that it really didn't seem right that I was being charged the full amount of arrears. The judge relented and in a "magnanimous" gesture, he provided me an "abatement" and cut my arrears in half. So, I got stuck paying twice for my children; once while I had them here with me, then again when I sent them back, because apparently, some judges believe that when someone is in drug rehab, that counts as a "residence" for the kids to return to. I battled with these ignorant fools for the rest of my kids' childhood. In fact, I was being billed and charged support payments for them long after they'd turned 18 and the order had long sincecome to and end. I've got more horror stories about dealing with lost files, incorrect audits, missing payments (keep your receipts!) incompetent, bumbling clerks and responding to incorrect "automated" threat letter mailings than I have space on this blog to list it all. I even got my kids back a second time when their mother relapsed and disappeared, leaving them to fend for themselves in Detroit, Michigan without a dime to their names. I was smart that time though, I immediately contacted the support office and changed custody. Hell, they even placed a support order on my ex for a change! I had hoped that amount owed to me would then just be collected to finish off my arrears payments, but no such luck. If they couldn't collect from her, then I still had to pay. Didn't matter that I now also had the added expenses of caring for my two kids full time again. They did reduce my monthly arrears amount a bit - you know, the arrears that accumulated from the last time I'd had the kids with me... How kind of them. By the way, to this date, the ex has never paid me a dime, either. I've reported her address at least three times to the support office, too. Wonder why the double standard here? My nightmare with child support ended some four years ago, when they sent me a letter stating that if I paid off half of my arrears, they'd dismiss my case. I ended up sending the bastards another $2,000 to get them out of my life forever. For at least another ten months after that, I had to contact them almost every month to ensure that the letters I was receiving stating I hadn't made a payment and was about to lose my driver's license would be squashed before it actually happened. I can't tell you how much money I gave to those rotten sunsabitches but I know one thing, they screwed me every which way but loose and they broke it off in me deep, folks. And I was one who actually wanted to pay for my kids. I can't imagine how things could get much worse for those who don't want to pay. It's no wonder people snap and go ballistic in the courthouses. The insanity, incompetence and unfairness of it all is enough to drive a man mad. Couple that with a nasty divorce and the baggage one might be carrying as a result of what led up to the divorce or separation and the situation has the ability to make a normally sane and rational person dangerously unstable. Imagine what could happen if the person has underlying emotional and/or mental health issues, too.....
St. Petersburg Times (Florida)
December 28, 2007 Friday
SINGLE FATHERS FACE DEARTH OF SYMPATHY, HOUSING BYLINE: ELISABETH DYER, Times Staff Writer SULPHUR SPRINGS

The August day he brought his infant home from the hospital, Todd McKelvey called his boss and quit.

Todd II would need his shots before he could go to day care, and there was no one else to keep him. His mother delivered him while in jail, charged with drug possession.

McKelvey took the baby home with Dylan, 18 months, Emily, 4, and Savannah, 11.

Four kids, no job.

So, that first week, McKelvey, 41, and the baby got in line with dozens of people seeking help from the government. All the others were women.

"They looked at me like 'Why are you here?'" he said. "I had to suck it up. I told myself, 'You're doing this for the kids.'"

Single moms are most often the beneficiaries of government and community aid. But as more men are granted custody of children, they are seeking the same help, said Jack Garrett, program manager at the Homeless Coalition of Hillsborough County.

Society, however, says men should be protectors and providers.

"The sympathy factor isn't there for single dads. There's this double standard," said Garrett, who completed his master's thesis on single fathers with kids living on the streets in Long Beach, Calif. Their common hurdle was overcoming pride.

"Men feel ashamed they can't meet society's perception," Garrett said.

Sometimes, he said, they give up, leaving their children with grandparents or more stable aunts and uncles, or allowing them to go into foster care.

State- and federally funded agencies can't discriminate when giving aid, but biases still exist, Garrett said. Government program titles such as Women, Infants and Children can be confusing for men who need the services. (Fathers are, indeed, eligible for the supplemental food program.)

For single dads who become homeless, the differences are more stark. In Tampa, the Salvation Army has 42 beds for single moms with children, but none for single men with children, said Steve Vick, general manager.

Mary & Martha House in Ruskin and Amen Outreach Ministry in Tampa offer shelter for women and children. But Metropolitan Ministries of Tampa is the only local agency that takes single fathers, said Tim Marks, chief development officer. "At one time this year, we had three single dads," he said.

Garrett said people don't realize that single dads face the same problems that single moms face. "They wonder, 'Why doesn't he just get a job?' "

Emily slides from the top of the recliner and drapes herself around her father's shoulders.

"Daddy-Daddy-Daddy-Daddy-Daddy," the 4-year-old chants, until he looks at her. "When is Dilly Pickle's birthday?"

"Dilly Pickle," also known as Dylan, is perched on the back of the couch. He will be 2 in May. Emily wants her little brother to have a Spider-Man birthday cake. He grins widely. After Dylan's mother went to jail, he quit saying the few words he knew.

When the baby wakes him at 4 a.m. for a bottle, scores of roaches scurry from the kitchen light. The two-bedroom cottage has no heat.

McKelvey holds weekly yard sales, juggles bills and stands in line to ask for government assistance to cover his $850 rent. He crosses off agencies that have no more money to give him.

"I just never thought in a million years my life would be like this," he said. "It's not only embarrassing and degrading, it's confusing."

Like many who find themselves unable to provide for their children, McKelvey made poor decisions that led to his situation.

Growing up in Hawaii, he dreamed of a career in marine science. At 16, after his father lost his job as an air traffic controller, McKelvey moved to his grandparents' in Virginia and dropped out of high school. He worked as a mechanic for 25 years but quit his latest job of 11 years when his youngest child was born in August.

He says he knows he has made bad choices, including an arrest in 1996 for possession of marijuana. That's all in his past, he said.

He met his children's mother six years ago. She danced and served drinks at a bar; he worked the door on weekends. They've been on and off since then, planning to marry, someday, never planning for children. They lived paycheck to paycheck.

At one time, she filed kidnapping charges, saying he took Emily, then 2. He said she was out every night doing drugs and unable to watch the kids. The charges were dropped. She could not be reached for comment.

McKelvey's mother, Judy, has helped out when money was tight. She paid his electric bill after the baby was born. But she has no more help to give, she says. She wants him to get a vasectomy. She distrusts his girlfriend and wonders whether the three younger children - the oldest is from a prior relationship - are even his.

"Doesn't matter," he said. "I'm Dad."

A state child welfare worker checks in on the children regularly, ever since their mother was turned in by a neighbor, McKelvey says. The worker tells McKelvey if he loses the house or the electricity gets shut off, the kids will go in foster care.

"That's the thing that scares me to death right now," he said.

Single dads, desperate, call McKelvey, asking where to get help, how to navigate the system. They hear about him from local providers. He tells them where to go, what to take with them.

Before Thanksgiving, he picked up Philip Miranda and drove to Metropolitan Ministries. Miranda, 45, has no car, no job and custody of his four children, ages 8 to 17. He signed up for holiday meals and Christmas presents.

"I go through it, tearing up in the shower, anxiety attacks," Miranda said. "It took a lot for me to go down and ask for food stamps. But if you don't, it's selfish. It's for the kids."

While at Metropolitan Ministries, Miranda applied for a job.

McKelvey wants a job. He says he's always applying, but the window of time he can work is limited by day care hours. (The baby is in day care, paid for with government vouchers.)

He needs to make at least $15 an hour. He needs flexibility for appointments and illnesses. He wants to get his high school diploma, maybe learn to repair computers. He wants to help other single dads navigate the network of resources.

This month he planned to attend classes on job searching. If he doesn't, the government food and $360 each month will stop.

In a few weeks, he expects to get another electricity cutoff date and eviction notice.

Sometimes McKelvey envies his girlfriend, who he says is in drug treatment until at least February.

"It doesn't seem fair. She's getting her teeth fixed and her GED," he said. "But what about us?"

Elisabeth Dyer can be reached at edyer@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3321.

To help Todd McKelvey, call Tracey or Cory Crocker at Covenant Chapel Ministries at 500-4286.

"...the body is most likely that of an indigent homeless man who had frozen to death."

Frozen body believed to be that of homeless man

Posted by Dave Gershman, David Jesse | The Ann Arbor News December 28, 2007 11:02AM

Michigan State Trooper Duane Zook searches through a wooded area where a body, believed to be that of a homeless man, was found Friday morning.

State police are investigating the death of a man whose body was found at a makeshift shelter near the park and ride on the Ann Arbor-Saline Road overpass above I-94.

State Police Sgt. Tony Cuevas said investigators believe the body is most likely that of an indigent homeless man who had frozen to death.

A road cleaning crew from the Washtenaw Sheriff's Department discovered the body while picking up trash at the park and ride, and called the state police at about 9:30 a.m.

Police found the makeshift shelter about 100 feet north of the park and ride.

Plastic tarps, blankets, lawn chairs, shoes and several tents could be seen at the site this morning.

Temperatures have ranged from a low of 23 degrees to the mid-30s in the last several days.

This would be at least the second death of a homeless man due to exposure in recent years. In February, 2006 a 49-year-old man was found frozen to death in his sleeping bag at a different encampment site off Maple Road near I-94. END
Homeless man found dead in Beaver County
Saturday, December 29, 2007

A homeless man's decomposed body was found in a small shed on a Beaver County hillside where he apparently bedded down for the winter.

Nick Mellovich, who was at least 60 years old, was discovered Thursday around 5 p.m. face down in the brick structure off Colonial Road in Bridgewater with his hat and clothes on, said Renea Esoldo, county chief deputy coroner.

Garbage bags filled with plastic bottles, clothing and blankets meant to ward off the cold were inside the shed.

A man whose mother lives in the area found the body when he went to check on Mr. Mellovich because he hadn't seen him for a while.

Ms. Esoldo said the body was so decomposed that it was difficult to determine exactly what killed Mr. Mellovich. She estimated he had been dead for "well over" six weeks. Ms. Esoldo ruled that Mr. Mellovich appeared to have died from natural causes.

Ms. Esoldo said Mr. Mellovich had stayed in shelters for decades and was known to people familiar with the area's homeless population.

Bridgewater police could not be reached for comment.

12.28.2007

"...the focus on chronic homelessness may have the unintended consequence of shifting services away from families and rural communities,”

This is becoming a very real problem in the outlying suburbs and smaller towns around Nashville as well, since the recent crackdown and generally homeless-unfriendly climate of the downtown area has sent the homeless in search of better living conditions outside of the normal haunts and hangouts. Unfortunately, these places are woefully underequipped and ill prepared to deal with large influxes of homeless and you can bet that it won't take long before the kindness turns to tough love in many of these places. Its a matter of scarce resources and prioritizing economic demands. And lets face it folks, the homeless aren't very high up on the priority lists of many towns and cities. Hell, Nashville rated concerns about the Homeless scarcely above concerns about garbage in our last mayor's race. Sigh....

Far From Big City, Hidden Toll of Homelessness

Monica Almeida/The New York Times

John Lobato sometimes sleeps in an abandoned bus on the edge of the small town of Trinidad near the New Mexico border.

Published: October 11, 2006

TRINIDAD, Colo. — As the Bush administration promotes a widely praised multibillion-dollar effort to end chronic homelessness in cities like Washington and San Francisco, a growing outcry is rising from rural areas that worsening problems far away from urban centers are being overlooked.

Monica Almeida/The New York Times

Sandi Espinoza, who runs the Open Door Soup Kitchen, left, with Brenda Holguin, who is living in a domestic violence shelter.

Monica Almeida/The New York Times

Pastor Cary T. Nelson with his mother, Louise, a co-pastor of First Christian Church, in Trinidad, Colo., in a house donated for use by a homeless family.

Rural homelessness has always taken a back seat to the more glaring problems in cities. Most studies estimate homeless people in small towns account for about 9 percent of the 600,000 or so homeless nationwide. But local officials and advocates for the homeless in small towns say that economic distress in recent years, including closing plants, failing farms, rising housing costs and other troubles, has left more people without homes and in greater need of help.

Real numbers are hard to come by because most rural areas, where homeless services often means ad-hoc help from church groups or volunteers, are far behind a parade of cities taking head counts.

“We are concerned that the focus on chronic homelessness may have the unintended consequence of shifting services away from families and rural communities,” said John Parvensky, executive director of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, one of several groups pushing the federal government to turn more attention to rural areas.

Among the homeless here is John Lobato, who offered a tour of his surroundings — the abandoned shuttle bus where he sometimes sleeps, the makeshift assortment of pallets, mattresses and blankets where he and other men pass time, often drinking, and the Purgatoire River, where he bathes.

Sometimes he takes his medicine for schizophrenia, Mr. Lobato said, sometimes not. Sometimes he sobers up for a while, but then the bottle calls.

“I know I need help,” he said, before embarking on a search for a liquor fix at midday in this isolated town 180 miles south of Denver. “But I don’t know where to get it.”

Until recently, many small towns like Trinidad coped with those who panhandled or set up makeshift encampments in the woods with what Lance Cheslock, director of La Puente, a shelter in Alamosa, near here, calls “Greyhound therapy.” They handed out bus tickets.

“They just send them up to the cities and let them deal with the problem there,” said Mr. Cheslock, among the advocates pushing for a new way to finance rural homeless programs.

The growing visibility of the problem has made some towns reconsider that attitude and push for local solutions, although they can be expensive and difficult.

Rural homelessness “doesn’t get enough attention,” said Philip Mangano, the executive director of the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness and the Bush administration’s chief coordinator of homeless services. But Mr. Mangano said the problem had been difficult to assess because rural communities by and large had not chronicled their problems with the data-heavy planning documents the Housing and Urban Development Department and other federal agencies increasingly demand.

“Like any profile of the homeless, there is a lot of anecdote and hearsay, but you need data and research to create policy,” Mr. Mangano said.

To confront the problem, he cited the examples of Washington and Michigan, where every county, many of them rural, has committed to writing a plan to end homelessness.

Here in Trinidad, a former old West coal town of 9,000 near the eastern slopes of the Sangre de Cristo mountains, people have long struggled through hard times. The downtown is pockmarked with shuttered storefronts, but new cafes and galleries have opened as the town tries to refashion itself as an artists’ colony.

Interstate 25, dotted with motels of various quality and shopping centers, slices through Trinidad, leaving tidy Victorian homes rising on a hill on one side and modest ranches, several in disrepair, on the other.

Sandi Espinoza, who directs the Open Door Soup Kitchen, in space borrowed from a church, said the organization was serving more meals than ever — families, veterans, men just released from prison and a wide assortment of people smelling of liquor before noon. Some 85 people come daily for lunch, double the number from a few years ago, Ms. Espinoza said.

“We need shelter here,” said one wobbly man, who when asked where he sleeps, replied, “down under the bridges.”

There is no homeless shelter, only a few drug, alcohol or mental illness treatment programs for the indigent, and a loose group of church pastors, volunteers and other concerned citizens striving to look after people who have no home.

“Pastor helps me out,” Mr. Lobato said. “The soup kitchen helps me out and these guys” — he motioned to his disheveled companions — “help me, too.”

A couple of weeks ago, officials here cheered the establishment of a “transitional housing unit,” a single-family home leased from the government for $1 a year where a displaced family can live for a year or so until they get back on their feet, the first such project started here. The organizers say several families, doubled up with relatives or friends, need a place like that.

There is nothing for the men living in the tents and shacks that have popped up behind the Wal-Mart, near the river.

To seek more stable solutions, a small group was recently formed. With guidance from Becky Vanderslice, an organizer with Housing Justice, a group based in Denver, they gathered around a church conference table and discussed problems that included the need for rehabilitation programs and families unable to make ends meet.

Finally, said Cary T. Nelson, pastor at First Christian Church, the group decided to start with the single-family home. Churches and volunteers will subsidize the costs of running the house, a foreclosed property held by the local office of the federal Agriculture Department.

They called the house Haven of Hope and have begun searching for a family to occupy it. One applicant, Brenda Holguin, said she hoped to move in with at least two of her four children, who are living with her estranged husband. A domestic dispute has left her homeless, living in a nearby domestic violence shelter, and such a house would help set her on a steady path, Ms. Holguin said. “Having a house, my family in one place, would give me more self-esteem,” she said.

Ms. Espinoza, who runs the soup kitchen, said she was hoping that local businesses or churches would step forward with donated space for an emergency shelter.

The National Coalition on Homelessness, an advocacy group, is considering mounting an effort to make the Agriculture Department, with its many field offices and staff members in rural areas, the lead agency for financing homeless programs outside urban areas. The task currently falls to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

“It should be the department of housing and urban-only development,” said Michael Stoops, the executive director of the coalition. “We should not give up on HUD, but we need to get other federal agencies involved.”

Last year, he said, HUD provided $120 million for 700 projects in rural areas, an amount that has remained constant for several years, federal officials said.

This year, the federal government has increased direct spending on homeless programs to about $4 billion, up from $2.9 billion and double the spending of five years ago. About 10 percent of that has gone toward a new focus on ending chronic homelessness, Mr. Mangano said.

The approach has fired up hope in Denver, San Francisco, Washington and other cities that headway is being made, but it has dismayed advocates in rural areas, where grant-writing expertise and the Talmudic knowledge of federal regulations are lacking.

Small towns also lack the network of nonprofit organizations and corporations that often underwrite efforts.

“The government wants matching funds and the big city funders only fund the big cities,” said Donna Haddow, a member of the Trinidad-Las Animas County Economic Development Board. “There’s nothing left by the time we come knocking.”

Ms. Vanderslice of Housing Justice said a prominent foundation would not finance the new housing program in Trinidad because it had decided to focus most of its resources on Denver.

“There is a lot of money to end homelessness in the state,” she said. “But a lot is going to the Denver metro area because the mayor there has a 10-year plan.”

Here, she added, “they are going on open faith.”

"The inmates have produced about two blankets a day."

While it seems a truly magnanimous effort, there's something that doesn't sit quite right with me about using prisoners to craft blankets for the Homeless. I can't put my finger on it but using the labor of those who might not be able to refuse without ramifications is discomforting. And something about providing services to the poor on the backs of the poorer is unsettling in a way I can't quite describe. Maybe I'm making a mountain out of a wonderfully compassionate molehill; I hope that is the case.....

Kansas prison recycles old inmates’ clothes into blankets for the homeless

HUTCHINSON, Kan. | A handful of Hutchinson prison inmates are helping warm the homeless with old prison blues.

The inmates are recycling used prison clothing to make blankets and have teamed with the Salvation Army in Hutchinson to distribute the thick twin-bed-sized blankets to those in need.

The shirts, pants and blanket-lined jean jackets worn by inmates already are made within the state’s prisons. Now, when the clothes wear out, they’ll get a second life, said Hutchinson Correctional Facility Warden Sam Cline.

“The idea came up after Governor Kathleen Sebelius encouraged all state agencies to recycle whatever they could,” Cline said. “We threw away a lot of fabric.”

The blankets project began earlier this month and has been a learning process, said Chris Merritt, the prison’s business manager and engineer of the project, who also quilts as a hobby.

The first blanket weighed about 40 pounds, Merritt said. Its top and bottom were made of pieced jean material, with two blankets in between.

Now each blanket includes a top made of recycled shirts, a bottom of material from inmate pants and coats — as well as some khaki material from correctional officers’ retired pants — and an old sheet and a recycled blanket in the middle.

The process starts by ripping apart and sorting the old clothing. Some inmates then square up the pieces, while others lay them out in a pattern on the concrete floor of the prison’s receiving warehouse.

The inmates piece together a top and bottom, add decorations, and then sew the blanket together.

The inmates have produced about two blankets a day.

“We have a steady flow of fabric, with 1,800 men here,” Cline said.

12.27.2007

Homeless Advocates Will Be Watching This One Closely....

This is very similar to Nashville's situation and you can bet that everyone will be watching the proceedings closely... Groups sue over West Palm Beach ban on feeding homeless in parks

Associated Press - December 27, 2007 6:54 AM ET

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) - Two groups are suing West Palm Beach over the city's ban on feeding the homeless in downtown parks.

The lawsuit claims the city ordinance violates their First Amendment rights to assemble and worship freely.

City commissioners who passed the ban in September say they were responding to complaints from downtown business owners about panhandlers and drug use. The measure prohibits anyone from giving away food.

The lawsuit argues the city is targeting the homeless. The two groups suing the city are the secular group Food Not Bombs and a ministry group, Art and Compassion, that views feeding the poor as part of its religious obligations.

" There are poems about fictitious fatal car accidents, sketches of mug shots, talk of sex and drug addiction and abuse and suicide."

Thank the Gods for Nashville's Oasis Center and the great outreach team that works with Homeless youth, Ben and Jen. They are out on the street damned near every day, trying to help Nashville's homeless kids get some positive things going in their lives, and trust me, it is not an easy job, but it certainly has "reward potential" that blows the lid off of most of my own work. Most of the folks I deal with have done quite a number on their lives. They often face hurdles, barriers and obstacles so complex and large that they appear overwhelming. Many have forever damaged their ability to live life "normally" and are forced to survive on the very bottom rung of society's socioeconomic ladder. Not so with most of the homeless kids. While they may have serious issues facing them, the chance that they've made mistakes that will ruin their chance at a happy future are slim. Intervening before that happens can make huge differences in the lives of these kids and Ben and Jen know this. It's why they take their job so seriously and they are so passionately involved in the effort. I can't thank them enough for their work and am proud to say I work with them.
Walsh: Homeless youth tell bleak tales
Reading the essays of homeless teenagers is a bit like sitting down with a Dickens novel. Bleak. There are poems about fictitious fatal car accidents, sketches of mug shots, talk of sex and drug addiction and abuse and suicide. Misspellings and garbled grammar are common - there are more important things to worry about. The nihilism and depression of surviving on the streets hangs over every word. But self-reflection and hope also worm their way in. I got a glimpse of harsh reality this month as a judge of Volunteers of America Utah's homeless youth essay contest. "They often are pretty invisible," says Zach Bale, manager of VOA's teen drop-in center at 655 S. State St. "We wanted to give homeless youth a voice." One boy writes of learning to panhandle: "I couldn't understand why absolute strangers would get so mad at me for asking for help," he said. "I was able to make enough to get by for a day. But the next day would be the same thing." Another explained the Catch-22 for a young homeless man - no birth certificate and no driver license equals no job, which leads to homelessness. "Why is it that a 14-year-old girl feels safer out on the streets instead of at home in bed?" asked Tayeah, a 20-year-old homeless woman and one of the contest winners. "Why is it that she has started using drugs or having sex and stealing instead of being in school with kids who could have a positive influence on her?" Volunteers of America figure they see 20 to 40 homeless teens a day, about 500 different teens a year, at the drop-in center. An informal poll last year found most have been abused physically or sexually - at home or on the streets. Most have come out of the foster care system - "aging out" at 18 or running away. Some are the older children of homeless parents who can't take care of them anymore. "Most have a fractured support network from day one," says Bale. "It's a survival skill to be invisible. But it can be a bad thing, too. Because as a community, we see homeless youth who we don't recognize as homeless." At the drop-in center, the kids, young adults - and in some cases, their toddlers - can do laundry, take a shower, sleep after being up all night and meet with case workers. VOA serves lunch and dinner and three snacks. But at 7 p.m., the center closes and the kids go back out on to the street, to shelters or to friends' couches. Limited funding keeps the center closed on weekends. Most of the young writers want out of the cycle. "People who run away are not always bad," one girl wrote. "People run away mainly because they're sad. Some people run away because they want to get out. But sooner or later, they find out it's not always the best thing." Drop-in center social workers will help track down identification and line up jobs and subsidized housing when a kid is ready. "The best advice I can give to a runaway is to try to talk to a teacher or an adult you trust to try to find a better way to solve a problem," wrote Tayeah, "instead of running away and causing what could be a permanent problem for a temporary situation." The winning essays will be published in "Zine," a magazine printed by the Salt Lake City Library for VOA. Tayeah and another winner will receive $10 or $15 gift certificates to Smith's stores. "Maybe their story in a few years will sound much different," says Michelle Templin, VOA communications manager. The butterflies and leaves sketched on two of the essays make me want to believe her. walsh@sltrib.com

12.26.2007

"Detectives are looking for clues at one South Nashville home, hoping it could crack their case. "

Are the cops on to something substantial here...??? Police Investigate Connection In 3 Recent Killings

Posted: Dec 24, 2007 06:56 PM

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Metro police are investigating a possible connection in three similar recent homicides.

Detectives are looking for clues at one South Nashville home, hoping it could crack their case.

Police have been taking evidence out of a home off Wedgewood Avenue.

They spent the weekend collecting evidence and information, they said, is related to the three homicides men last week. Two victims were homeless men.

Police said they have not arrested anyone related to the case, but they believe the home on Wedgewood Avenue and the area near it may lead them to their suspect.

Police did not disclose what they were looking for or any other details except to say that they are looking for connections between the killings.

Brandon Coons was found shot to death on Sixth Avenue North. Two days later, Jose Coronado was found dead near the railroad tracks just south of Fogg Street.

On Wednesday, George Ingle, who was also homeless, was found shot to death. Police discovered his body at the corner of Benton Avenue.

A Metro police spokeswoman said that detectives are interviewing residents in the area for leads.

Police did not say what they found in the home or if they are on the trail of a serial killer. Police said that the cases may be related.

During the search on Wedgewood Avenue, police arrested a man, now held on a parole violation.

Police said they have not made an arrests directly related to the case.

If anyone has information that could help police, they should call Crime Stoppers at 74-CRIME.

12.25.2007

HAPPY HOLIDAY!

Churches, Charities Give Homeless Special Christmas

Posted: Dec 24, 2007 04:26 PM

Barbara Raper
Barbara Raper
Jim Coode
Jim Coode
Steve Ritter
Steve Ritter

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Across Nashville, charity organizations and churches combined forces to help make this Christmas more special for the homeless.

On Monday morning, more than 300 people gathered for a warm meal and fellowship at Holy Name Church, a Catholic Church in East Nashville.

Through support from different the United Way and churches, homeless people in East Nashville have been able to receive this gift for the past 19 years.

"There are people who are hungry in this town and there's no reason for them to be hungry here," said Steve Ritter, an advocate for the homeless.

Children of all ages got to spend time with Santa Claus.

"To me, it's enjoyable because I don't have nobody," said Barbara Raper, who is homeless. "That way I've got friends that I know and it makes me feel better."

"The people that come here for the most part are grateful for what we do," said Jim Coode, projects manager.

The Loaves and Fishes program, which is made up of volunteers, provides meals to Nashville's homeless and low-income families.

"We have breaded beef patties, turnip greens, buttered noodles with gravy," Ritter said, adding that there were cookies for dessert.

Coode said the holidays can be hard for some people, especially the homeless because "everybody's with family this time of year and they're not."

More than 3,000 homeless people will be served this Christmas, but there are few places to help them.

"There's no place downtown serving today and so maybe all they can do is ask someone for a couple of bucks to go to McDonalds to get a hamburger," Ritter said. "They shouldn't have to, but that's the reality of the situation."

That's why on a night like Monday, the kindness of others gives the less fortunate a little more faith.

"God provides, that's what it's about," said Al Simms of Nashville. "It's about God and the church. Without the church, there ain't nothing."

Programs such as this are funded by donations from the United Way of Metropolitan Nashville and other area churches.

The church expects a larger crowd Tuesday when another holiday meal is served from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

About 25 percent of the recipients will be children from low-income households.

Holy Name Church is located at 508 Main Street in East Nashville.

12.24.2007

"Housing should be a right. Health care should be a right. No one person should die for lack of shelter."

There's something very wrong with a nation that asks her people to serve their country by fighting in wars, then upon their return home allows them to become destitute and broken, haunted by war demonry while begging, sleeping and crying in the streets.... Ceremony honors 2007's homeless victims By edit@ctpost.com (LINDA CONNER LAMBECK lclambeck@ctpost.com) The Connecticut Post updated 8:00 p.m. CT, Sat., Dec. 22, 2007 BRIDGEPORT — Braving Friday's cold weather, the way the homeless do every day, about 100 people huddled in front of Homes for the Brave to remember homeless people who died in the city during 2007. They remembered Daniel, Jeffrey, John and Joseph. Also Tom, Mack, John P. and Bill. As the names were called, red, white and blue carnations were placed in a wreath. A military honor guard, flags snapping in the wind, stood at attention in front of the shelter for homeless veterans at 655 Park Ave. Taps was played. The noon ceremony drew about 100 dignitaries, military and the public. Hosted by Homes for the Brave and the Southwest Community Health Center, the program also was an opportunity to distribute free coats and to educate. Of the nation's estimated 3.5 million homeless, as many as one in four are veterans, said Rich DeNisco, coordinator of health care for homeless at the health center. It's believed there are 33,000 people in Connecticut with no place to live. The last time a homeless census was done in Bridgeport, the number reached 1,400. DeNisco thinks that count was low. This is the third year that National Homeless Persons' Memorial Day was observed locally, a date traditionally observed on or close to the first day of winter, which this year is today. "It strikes me what a shame that we have to deal with an issue called homelessness," said Katherine Yacavone, president and chief executive officer of Southwest. "Housing should be a right. Health care should be a right. No one person should die for lack of shelter." State Sen. John McKinney, R-Fairfield, who a few days ago proposed a $17 million plan to build supportive housing, affordable housing and tax credits aimed at eradicating homelessness in the state, also spoke. "I'm not charting a course, you are," he told the audience. "Enough is enough. We can end homelessness. We should be ashamed to let this continue to happen." McKinney said the state should not wait for the federal government to act. He said federal efforts to attack the homeless problem — made 20 years ago after his father, the late U.S. Rep. Stuart McKinney, died — were envisioned as a first step. "It turned out to be the only step," he said. Joy Kiss, executive director of Homes for the Brave, said her 33-bed facility has served 452 homeless men in the past five years, 405 of who once wore a military uniform. "We owe it to soldiers who put lives on lines to take care of them," she said. One is Michael Hasselbacher, who read the proclamation sent by U.S. Rep. Christopher Shays, R-4, at the ceremony. A Navy veteran who now lives in Milford, Hasselbacher, 57, spent 15 months at Homes for the Brave between January 2005 and May 2006. A recovering alcoholic, Hasselbacher said he was referred to the facility after becoming unemployed, broke and homeless. Homes for the Brave gave him vocational counseling, shelter, food and health care. "Life happens. Because of my circumstances, I was on a downward spiral. Homes for the Brave put me back on my feet and restored me to independent living," he said.

12.23.2007

"The applications were very competitive..."

Absolute horsehockie. Since when do we have to "compete" to save the lives of our fellow citizens? This is the major problem of legislation like McKinney Vento. It forces agencies to compete for very scarce resource dollars. When agencies must compete for minimal resources there is a strong incentive to overinflate their own accomplishments while minimizing the positive impact of competing agencies. Why would anyone lend support or provide kudos to another agency when it could mean that agency might end up receiving the money next year that went to you this year? There is little doubt in my mind that competition like this leads to a decrease in cooperation, fosters secrecy and alienation between agencies and generally inhibits cross-agency collaboration. The current mentality of many federal officials, who can spend $20 million dollars on a Ferry to nowhere yet force our social service agencies to compete for dollar-crumbs, is simply inexcusable. Competition has been shown to be useful up to a certain point and no further, but cooperation, which is the thing we must strive for today, begins where competition leaves off. Franklin D. Roosevelt

Chattanooga gets no extra federal funds to help homeless

TimesFreePress Audio
Roy A.Bernardi - Download MP3-

PDF: Homeless grants

By Pam Sohn Staff Writer

Federal housing officials Friday announced a record $1.5 billion for homeless assistance, including just over $1 million to Chattanooga for existing local programs, but the city won no additional money for new initiatives, according to Washington officials.

"The applications were very competitive," said Brian Sullivan, spokesman for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Chattanooga could have scored well, but other cities scored better."

Chattanooga, a pilot city for HUD homeless initiatives in recent years, received $1,061,656 to fund existing programs operated by the Chattanooga Homeless Coalition; the Partnership for Families, Children and Adults; Chattanooga Church Ministries; Fortwood Center; CADAS; and the city of Chattanooga.

Karen McReynolds Blevins, director of the Homeless Coalition, which collected and compiled the grant applications, could not be reached for comment.

Richard Beeland, spokesman for Mayor Ron Littlefield and the city's homeless efforts, declined comment.

"We haven't seen it yet," he said of HUD's Friday announcement.

Janna Jahn, with the Chattanooga Housing Authority, had sought new money for the agency to pay for additional housing vouchers to expand the number of apartments available for homeless people.

"We don't know why we didn't get it," she said Friday afternoon. "We won't know until we have a chance to get with HUD (officials) and ask about it."

Altogether, 10 cities and regions in Tennessee received $16.4 million for programs to help the homeless.

Memphis received more than $4.8 million, including nearly $841,000 for three new supportive housing programs.

Nashville received $3.3 million, including nearly $1 million for three new supportive housing programs.

Knoxville received almost $1.2 million for existing programs.

HUD Deputy Secretary Roy A. Bernardi said the funding nationally will offer transitional and permanent supportive housing to more than 168,000 homeless individuals and families.

"We know this will literally save lives," Mr. Bernardi said in a teleconference.

Mr. Bernardi said half of the people served are families with children. Another segment of homeless people receiving attention are the chronically homeless, those people who are homeless over and over, or for a long time.

According to HUD research, about 20 percent of all homeless people experience long-term or chronic homelessness, and the chronically homeless use more than half of all emergency shelter resources designed to assist all homeless individuals and families.

"Just a few weeks ago we announced an 11.5 percent reduction in the chronic homelessness nationally between 2005 and 2006," Mr. Bernardi said. "That's the first time in this country we've ever been able to see a reduction of homelessness of any kind. It's significant, but we still have an awful lot of work to do."

E-mail Pam Sohn at psohn@timesfreepress.com

12.22.2007

"The chronically homeless make up 10 percent of the homeless population but consume 50 percent of the resources,"

We're staying put over the holidays. Park Center puts on a big Christmas Feed for our members so Dorothy and I will be volunteering our time on Christmas day helping prepare food and then serving it to our members. I'm also considering taking some food down to Tent City again; we were there yesterday and passed out 15 Quiznos sandwiches, courtesy of my huge-hearted brother in law, Ray. Ray's been quietly helping the Homeless in and around Nashville since he learned that homelessness was such a huge problem in Davidson county and he's gone out of his way to bring food, supplies and help to the many who desperately need it. When I mentioned I was heading to Brentwood yesterday afternoon to pick up some coats given to me by Southeast Financial Credit Union's generous employees and patrons, he took the coat off his own back and threw it into my van; "make sure someone gets this, wouldya?" he exclaimed as he walked away. That's just the way Ray is and I can't thank him enough for his generosity and assistance. Too bad we didn't have an entire world filled with Rays....

Johnson: No home or place for the holidays

The pull of hearth and home will have Americans on the move this weekend. AAA estimates that 53 million of us will drive more than 50 miles, and almost 9 million will wing our way over the river and through the woods this Christmas to binge and splurge with family and friends.

The National Retail Federation projects holiday sales of $475 billion, almost half a trillion bucks spent on bathrobes, bad ties, iPods, iPhones and I don't know what else. And there will be an estimated 750,000 homeless in America on the night Christians remember Christ in the creche.

The United States Conference of Mayors released its 2007 Hunger and Homelessness Survey this week. The conference surveyed 23 cities to document the magnitude of hunger and homelessness. The survey examined cities as large as Boston and as small as Santa Monica, Calif. Nashville was the only Tennessee city surveyed.

Tennessee's capital city saw an increase in the number of people in need of food over the past year. While the number of homeless individuals in Nashville declined, the number of homeless households with children rose. As was the case in many cities, mental illness and lack of affordable housing were the leading causes of homelessness. Substance abuse also caused individuals to be homeless, and unemployment was a leading reason families didn't have a roof over their heads.

Here in Knoxville, Tom von Berg, vice president of communications at Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee, said unemployment often leads to hunger in the 18-county region his agency serves. "Rural unemployment is especially difficult," von Berg said. "When industry leaves a small town, the workers are out of work, and the town loses tax revenue and doesn't have the resources to retrain workers." About 80 percent of the folks Second Harvest and its partner agencies serve are working poor. Another 15 percent are unemployed poor.

Knox Area Rescue Ministries (KARM) has fed over 30,000 meals per month every month since July, with some months up over 20 percent. "We are seeing more women with children in our cafeteria lines," said Burt Rosen, President of KARM. "With the high price of groceries and gas, KARM is serving more people who are living on the fringe but are not homeless." Meanwhile, overnight stays in KARM's emergency shelter are up over 15 percent from last year.

Rebecca Sass, director of community relations at the Salvation Army in Knoxville, said her agency has served 27 percent more people this year than last. "Our Bootstraps (transitional housing) program has a waiting list for the first time in 13 years," Sass said.

John Lawler, director of Knoxville's Ten-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness, said Knoxville will soon know better the magnitude of its homeless problem. Dr. Roger Nooe will conduct a survey at the end of January to try to identify the number of homeless in Knoxville, including the chronically homeless.

"The chronically homeless make up 10 percent of the homeless population but consume 50 percent of the resources," Lawler said. Lawler said the chronically homeless spin through a revolving door from emergency rooms to jail to psychiatric hospitals. "We're seeing more momentum than ever to house the chronically homeless," Lawler said.

Volunteer Ministry Center (VMC) fills the permanent housing slot on Knoxville's continuum of care. "We help people get out of homelessness and into a place and then work on their problems," said Ginny Weatherstone, chief executive officer at VMC. So far this year, VMC has placed 76 people in permanent housing.

Weatherstone told of a mentally ill man who had been in and out of shelters for 12 years. VMC provided a place, and a local church paid part of his rent while he worked on his issues. Now, the man is working and paying his own rent while the church helps another formerly homeless neighbor.

As our going and getting reach a crescendo, there are those with no place to go, no way to get. Sort of like that young couple 2,000 years ago who were far from home with no place to stay. Until an innkeeper opened his stable. And his heart.

Greg Johnson is an East Tennessee native and resident and writes this column for the News Sentinel. E-mail him at jgregjohnson@hotmail.com.

Smiling does a body good

Democracy Now Livestream