The leaders from Arizona, Nevada, Utah, California and Hawaii suggest focusing on providing more affordable and permanent housing as opposed to managing homelessness. “What we're really trying to do is move the system from focusing on emergency response to permanent housing,” said Fred Karnas, director of the Arizona Department of Housing and co-chair of the state's Interagency & Community Council on Homelessness.
Karnas and others gathered at the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness Western Regional Meeting for States to share ideas.
Philip Mangano, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Interagency Council, said the goal was to discuss what's working and what's not.
The most recent figures show there are more than 14,500 homeless people in Arizona, with 60 percent of them in Maricopa County, said Jacki Taylor, executive director of the Arizona Coalition to End Homelessness.
Chronic homelessness refers to people who are often homeless because of mental illness or other issues requiring intense support.
Arizona has received more than $100 million in federal money over the past five years to help decrease that number, according to Mangano.
Putting most of the state's resources in emergency housing costs more than attempting to create a more permanent situation for the homeless, expert say.
It's cheaper to sustain them in permanent, affordable housing than it is to sustain them on the streets, Taylor said.
The cost to provide permanent housing for one chronically homeless person ranges between $13,000 and $25,000 annually, according to the national Interagency Council. The cost of not providing permanent affordable housing ranges from $35,000 to $150,000 per year.
As more state and nonprofit leaders discuss issues at a national Interagency Council meeting next month in Washington, leaders hope to move even closer to coming up with more specific solutions.
Comments:
There are some who CHOSE to homeless, and there are others that really belong in an institution. Giving out permanent homes to the chronically homeless is not the solution. Getting them commited or motivated to help themselves IS the answer. There are some people who will always follow the path of least resistance (that's how rivers and streams become crooked). I question that statistic. The biggest cost of homeless is medical costs. So, how does permanent shelter help that? And now that you've provided permanent shelter for them, how are you going to police the drug use and social problems stemming from mental illness. If you are going to cram a bunch of homeless pepole into one housing arena, call it what it is: an institution. And then go about funding for it based on it being an institution. Simple solution...every time we give an illegal immigrant free health care, we send them a homeless american. Lots of one-way greyhound tickets would be cheaper than the current status quo and we could probably get a bulk purchase discount.