The 3rd co-presenter happened to be Doctor Deborah Borne, who is the Medical Examiner for the Tom Waddell Health Center in San Francisco, CA., and I have to say that her level of energy and excitement for providing services to under-served and ignored populations is something that not only impressed me, it frankly amazed me. She and her Outreach Director both flew into town on the red-eye, arriving in Nashville around 9am, and rather than hang at their hotel long enough to at least catch up on the time difference, they piled into my truck and visited Ken and Carols, where Reverend Pat and Mz Toi provided them with some reality checks on the status of folks languishing on our streets and alleyways around our otherwise fine and dandy city.
From there we bopped over to the Mission, then rolled down into the old Tent City. The gate was open on the north side behind ICM, so we drove on through and went into what used to be the "heart" of the camp. From there, we did some wandering while i filled her in as best I could on the camp's demise and where things are at presently.
We then tried to connect w some good "hole in the wall" bbq joint but the one I knew of over near Eastland, Carol -Anns (not sure I have the name right), was so busy that they only had fish left by the time we got there.
I dropped Deborah and Jason off at Jacks down on Broadway - yeah, yeah, it'll do in a pinch - with a promise to hook up w them both about an hour prior to our presentation.
The National Health Care for the Homeless Conference was held at the Legislative Plaza and went off without a hitch. It was interesting to watch Dr. Borne move from her role as sightseer to trainer; I was so impressed w her that I'd go to work for her in a San Fran second if I didn't already have an outstanding job w its own fine folks who nurture my professionalism and help me grow grow grow as a pro! Loads of fun for sure, but the biggest deal of all, at least to me, was when Jason shared w me the most amazing, collaborative and downright cool software program I think I've ever seen for folks who work with peeps stuck on the streets.

Jason would probably be mad at me for lumping this incredible program into the same bucket as a standard Homeless Management Information System, but if anything fits that description, this program does and honestly it's about the only thing I really have to make an example with, since I've not seen anything else like it.
The program is designed to both disseminate and coordinate information among a host of agencies and services. I only saw "test case" examples, thanks to a rigorous and strict credentialing access system, but even so I was able to watch as the software revealed how many shelter visits the person had over the past year, how many ER visits, how many EMS calls responded to him/her, what meds the person was on, where they were receiving medical, mental health and general services at, nurses and treatment notes and what medications that person was on! When queried, the program sends a probe into the databases of local hospitals, shelters and agencies participating in the program and just about any information you might need is right at your fingertips!
Now, I can almost guarantee you that civil libertarians, and I would consider myself one, are going to be highly suspicious of this program and it's definitely understandable. There are a lot of ways the data could be used nefariously. Already there has been at least one instance that I have heard of (trying t find the actual article on it now but am working on a very slow network that is causing me much frustration, not to mention boredom as I wait for pages to load) where police in some city were able to access the HMIS database, and in Asheville, North Carolina, I believe, there is an officer on the force who is trained in HMIS and has access.
I still have a hard time supporting any "information collection systems" and this one is no exception, but I've got to say that the benefits, when used appropriately, are definitely significant. One of he other cool things about this system - and one that brings me at least some peace of mind that it's not being used incorrectly - is that there are designated "snoopers" who log in and review the other "log-ins" on the system. They are responsible for reviewing who is accessing what and whether the person doing the accessing, even if they have the appropriate credential level, has a direct need to view that particular case file. As I understand it from Jason, the penalties for improper viewing are severe and include being barred from access, so it keeps folks from "browsing" through folks they aren't directly engaged with. Now that feature is one I happen to really like a lot!